Adam Putnam Sees Hope For Water Truce With EPA

Ag commissioner wants to get battle over nutrient standards out of the courts
By: Kenric Ward | Posted: June 4, 2011 3:55 AM

Adam Putnam

Agriculture Commissioner Adam Putnam

Saying Florida needs "good science to make good decisions," state Agriculture Commissioner Adam Putnam suggested Friday that the battle with Washington over water-quality standards might be easing.

"There will be new regulations," Putnam told the Florida Water Forum in Orlando. "The only question is, will Florida make the right decisions for Florida, or will they come from a judge and the EPA while the rest of the states get off scot-free?"

But instead of fighting the federal Environmental Protection Agency's costly and controversial "numeric nutrient criteria," Putnam said the state should develop its own NNC standards.

Arguing that Florida has the most sophisticated and detailed water-quality data in the nation, the commissioner indicated that the EPA may be willing to at least listen.

"We have the data. The EPA just put its spin on it. We have our narrative approach that, I hope, the EPA will decide is acceptable," he said.

Calling protracted litigation and imposed federal mandates a losing proposition, Putnam said, "We have seen some indications that the EPA wants to find another way.

"We have to get out of the litigation business," he said.

Others weren't so optimistic or conciliatory.

In a videotape produced for Friday's forum, Putnam's successor in Congress, Rep. Dennis Ross, R-Lakeland, blistered "EPA bureaucrats who never set foot in Florida."

Florida's water utilities, agricultural and business groups have assailed the EPA's numeric nutrient standards as both ineffective and inappropriate. Last December, the state and other concerned parties sued over the EPA's proposed rules.

A brief from the Associated Industries of Florida declared that the "unprecedented federal standards" would require "extraordinary levels of pre-development purity."

"The extremely restrictive criteria that the EPA has adopted are, in many instances, technologically impossible to meet," AIF stated.

The Florida Department of Environmental Protection estimates that the EPA mandates would impose $21 billion in capital costs on municipal wastewater treatment and stormwater utilities.

Putnam's Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, along with the University of Florida, concluded that the mandates would cost the ag industry $1.148 billion annually and kill up to 14,500 full- and part-time jobs.

The EPA, by contrast, has pegged the costs at $135.5 million to $206 million per year.

But even the EPA's own science advisory board has criticized the agency's method for developing river and stream nutrient standards, giving the state ammunition to fight the mandates.

Putnam, who hails from a longtime agricultural family in Polk County, criticized the EPA for attempting to "hijack Florida's water policies." But he conceded that numeric nutrient criteria will ultimately supplant the state's current "total maximum daily load" measurement, in any event.

"The numeric nutrient standards must be a Florida-focused issue. We expose ourselves to greater federal intervention if there is a perceived withdrawal of interest by the state. We need good science to make good decisions," he said.

State Rep. Trudi Williams, R-Fort Myers, also speaking at the Orlando forum, said Florida must confront the EPA's numeric nutrient criteria because "the federal rules are not based on fact."

"They took pristine water in the Everglades and still wanted it [nutrient content] lower," said Williams, who chairs the Select Committee on Water Policy.

Legislation directing the DEP to develop Florida-based criteria passed the House but failed to get a hearing in the Senate.

Nonetheless, Williams told Sunshine State News that DEP is working to produce new standards, which would then be submitted to the EPA for review.


Contact Kenric Ward at or at (772) 802-5341.

Comments (6)

10:04AM OCT 23RD 2014
As usual, a Republican takes the side of industry! To hell with pollution standards set by the government. Lets allow Floridas polluting industries set the rules, how clean our water should be. I at least will make sure not to vote for this piece of work!
9:59PM DEC 29TH 2011
It's always a relief when someone with obvuios expertise answers. Thanks!
12:26PM DEC 27TH 2011
Please keep trhoiwng these posts up they help tons.
1:28PM JUN 4TH 2011
Maybe Putnam can use all those illegals he advocated for to clean the water?
7:07AM JUN 4TH 2011
Another thing to those who are fighting against better water quality standards, just because the water is clean and plentiful where you live, doesn't mean it's that way across the state.

A good source for news on our water is "Brown and Caldwell, Florida Water News":
7:00AM JUN 4TH 2011
"The only question is, will Florida make the right decisions for Florida, or will they come from a judge and the EPA while the rest of the states get off scot-free?"

The rest of the states getting off scot-free? Nah, they'll just pay a greater amount later to mitigate the damages to their water instead of paying ahead to prevent the damage. That way, they can socialize some of the costs of doing business by getting the taxpayers to clean it up rather than passing the cost to the customer where it belongs. (And the best part is that most Tea Party supporters won't even catch on.)

Otherwise, this: "The extremely restrictive criteria that the EPA has adopted are, in many instances, technologically impossible to meet," is a pretty big statement by AIF. I wonder what they have to back that statement up.

BTW, there are other states who are taking on better water standards. Oregon was set to become the state with the strictest water standards but it's being fought by their legislature.

As with most any negotiations I know those on one side will ask for the most they could hope to get because the other side will offer the least they can. In the case of water that has to be shared not just with all businesses and citizens today, but with every future generation to come, I just hope we let science prevail for the long haul over excess profits in the near term.

Leave a Comment on This Story

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.