Business

Americans for Prosperity Rips FPL's $690 Million Rate Request

By: Kenric Ward | Posted: June 15, 2012 3:55 AM
Turkey Point

Turkey Point nuclear power plant on Biscayne Bay, left, St. Lucie nuclear plant on Hutchinson Island, right | Credit: FPL

Florida Power & Light Co.'s proposed $690 million-a-year rate increase, adding 16 percent to the current base rate, will be vigorously opposed by the Florida Office of Public Counsel and a conservative group.

With a series of nine public hearings set to conclude by month's end, J.R. Kelly sees "no way" FPL's full request is valid, and if past is prologue, the Public Service Commission will chop the utility's rate bid significantly.

For residential customers, the FPL plan would hike the base rate portion of a typical bill by $6.97 per 1,000 kilowatts per month, Kelly's office says.

FPL spokeswoman Elaine Hinsdale has a significantly lower calculation. She says customers would pay only a net increase of about 5 cents more per day.

The utility's filing this year is consistent with its notice to the PSC in January that an adjustment is needed because the existing rate agreement, which effectively froze base rates for three years, expires at the end of 2012.

FPL expects that, even with the proposed hike, its customer bills will still be the lowest in the state and well below the national average.

FPL is seeking to boost its rate of return on equity capital to 11.5 percent, but Kelly calls that "excessive and unreasonable."

Since the PSC granted a 10 percent ROE in 2010, Kelly's office says the cost of capital has decreased and has recommended a 9.25 percent in other utility cases.

Each 1 percent increment of ROE translates into an additional $130 million to $140 million from FPL's 8 million ratepayers.

Kelly says his office is still researching the FPL request and expects to issue a final recommendation July 2. His two key concerns center on the return on equity and on the capital structure of FPL's parent company, NextEra Energy Inc.

Specifically, Kelly's office is examining FPL's proposed salaries and benefits; the reasonableness of affiliate charges; the utility's projections of customers, revenues and expenses; and the prudence of the company's expenses related to plant modifications and upgrades.

In 2010, FPL requested a rate increase in excess of $800 million. The PSC eventually granted $75 million.

"They seemed to do fine with that, completing projects, with a good credit rating and access to credit markets," Kelly said.

A conservative political group, Americans for Prosperity, has jumped into the rate case on behalf of consumers.

"FPL has a monopoly on its services -- they have no competition and have a guaranteed return on investment currently of 10 percent," said Slade O'Brien, AFP's Florida state director.

Meantime, O'Brien points out, shareholders of FPL’s parent company NextEra received a 22 percent return in 2011, and NextEra's profits increased 72 percent in the first quarter of 2012.

"This certainly begs us to ask -- why is a rate increase needed?" said O'Brien.

FPL officials say their company has a history of tightening its belt. But O'Brien says the utility's 2011 CEO compensation of $14.8 million "doesn't seem like belt-tightening to us."

"At a time where the average consumer is lucky to receive 1 percent return on their savings, if they have any savings at all, it is outrageous that FPL can ask for such an unfounded and egregious rate increase," O'Brien said.

FPL notes that its typical residential customer bill is 13 percent lower today than it was in 2006, and that business customers' charges have decreased, on average, about 14 percent over the same period.

 

"Most small businesses, which comprise more than 80 percent of all commercial customers in FPL's territory, would see little change in their bills in 2013," the company said in a statement.

In a separate case, FPL's request for "advance cost recovery" for two additional nuclear reactors proposed at Turkey Point is scheduled to be heard by the PSC this fall.



Contact Kenric Ward at kward@sunshinestatenews.com or at (772) 801-5341.





Comments (4)

EstatesLady11
4:15PM JUN 16TH 2012
I'm trying to save money by conserving.
I keep the therm. high in summer and low in Winter.
I only use the dishwasher when I run out of dishes. I only run full loads of Laundry. I have a small counter top oven and hardly ever use my big oven. And I have wells.
If I didn't do these things my bill would be double what it is now, and its higher than it was in 2006.

This rate hike they want is to pay for the Smart Meters they're putting in, they should be called SNOOP Meters. In addittion to being a health hazard, they will now be snooping.
The cost of these meters is 800 million, the feds gave them 200 million, do the math.
Counties are opting out of the meter changeover, find out if you're in one of them. I'm fighting health issues because of the Radio Waves they produce all through your home 24/7.
Walker
11:47AM JUN 16TH 2012
My power bill is NOT lower than in 2006, it has increased about $100 a monthy . . . .and I own a small home. This is ridiculous. . . . .if they raise the rates, I will have to stop using my heat in the winter and go to small room heaters. For my very small house, the heat bill is $200 a month during the cold months.
Molly
6:56AM JUN 15TH 2012
Not sure whose bill FPL is looking at but mine is definitely NOT 13% lower today than it was in 2006.
RepublicanConscience
6:34AM JUN 15TH 2012
This is just a gambit. They ask for the moon, then give the government a chance to let them raise the rate only $100 million, giving the legislature cover. They can brag they saved the taxpayers $590 million, and FPL gets the increase they want. This is all theater.

Leave a Comment on This Story

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.