Government

Bill Nelson Tone Deaf on Earmarks

Senator flips over pork-barrel spending; will he pay the price in 2012?
By: Kenric Ward | Posted: December 16, 2010 4:05 AM
Bill Nelson SpeakingSen. Bill Nelson
Apparently, Bill Nelson didn't get the memo. Or maybe he just forgot.

From President Barack Obama to the lowest ranking Republican on Capitol Hill, budget earmarks have become a Washington whipping boy.

But Florida's senior senator is sparing the rod and liberally piling on the pork as he and fellow Democrats in the state's House delegation shoved millions of dollars in special projects into the lame-duck Congress' omnibus budget bill this week.

"It seems Democrats learned nothing from the 2010 election," said Sandy Adams, R-Oviedo, who trounced one-term Democratic Rep. Suzanne Kosmas this fall. "A 2,000-page spending bill loaded with billions in earmarks? Ridiculous."

Kosmas, D-New Smyrna Beach, is hoping to go out with a bang as she sponsored several earmarks, including $1 million for a veterans medical city connector and $250,000 for park expansion in the city of Winter Park.

But Kosmas is a piker compared to the flip-flopping Nelson, who just weeks ago voted for an earmark ban. Now he leads Florida's pork-barrel parade. Among his largest parlays:

  • $2 million for Florida Keys water quality improvements;
  • $1.65 million for Kennedy Space Center's Launch Complex 36/46;
  • $1.5 million for St. John's Heritage Parkway interchanges;
  • $1.2 million for Jacksonville commuter rail alternative analysis;
  • $1 million for Cooperative Grouper-Snapper Fisheries Data Collection.

While individual earmark projects may be worthy endeavors, such special set-asides have come under fire because they skirt the usual committee-hearing process and, thus, lack transparency.

Outgoing Republican Sen. George LeMieux calls earmarks "the gateway drug to ever-growing spending." LeMieux, who is considering a challenge to Nelson in 2012, said he has not requested any earmarks during his nearly two years in the Senate.

LeMieux spokesman Ken Lundberg said that while earmarks comprise "maybe 1 percent of federal spending," they are an "enabler for more government spending."

President Obama professed to share those concerns, saying his biggest regret of his first year in office was signing a budget bill that contained thousands of earmarks. He had campaigned in 2008 on a pledge to end earmarks and increase transparency in the budget process.

Though it's unknown whether Obama would sign another earmark-laden bill this time around, Congress is under a deadline to act. By the end of business on Saturday, the Senate must either pass the $1.1 trillion omnibus bill or approve another continuing resolution to fund the government, Lundberg said.

Conservative Republicans have pledged to block all earmarks on Capitol Hill this year. Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., has asked that the entire budget bill be read on the Senate floor -- a process that could take days.

In addition to earmarks, DeMint notes that the omnibus spending bill contains more than $1 billion to implement what he calls "the unconstitutional Obamacare law."

Floridians are increasingly fed up with federal budgets that resemble a pork-grinding exercise.

Dale O'Leary of Avon Park calls the larded-up omnibus bill "a pernicious form of bribery."

"The leadership knows that, for example, there are congressmen who are loath to vote against salaries for the military. These congressmen don't want to have to face an opponent in the next election who can scream, 'My opponent voted against paying our troops on the battlefield,'" O'Leary states.

Just as insidious is House Majority Leader Harry Reid's eleventh-hour gambit to push through an earmark-laden spending bill that no one had seen until this week -- essentially daring recalcitrant Republicans to shut the government down. Reid, D-Nev., is eschewing a continuing resolution because earmarks cannot be added to it.

Comments (7)

6:52PM DEC 16TH 2010
It's easy to make fun ear marks, but I don't see the point arguing over less than 1% of the federal budget. The elephant in the room is big ticket items like social security, medicare and defense spending. Until we make meaningful cuts to these, its all a waste of time.

Not to mention that we'll also more than likely need to raise taxes as well.

When a family is in debt up to their eyeballs, they don't spend 10 years squabbling with each other over the difference between having and not having a cup of coffee in the morning while at the same time agreeing that driving a brand new luxury car is a necessity.

Painful cuts need to be made. I've been saying this for literally as long as I've understood the issue. But we'll also need to consider raise taxes as well. If not now, then soon.

I'd be interested in hearing your response to this using the "You Fix the Budget" tool on the nytimes.com website: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/11/13/weekinreview/deficits-grap...

Were you able to balace the budget without raising taxes or cutting programs that you deem invaluable? If so, how did you do it? If not, where did you compromise?

Looking forward to hearing your response!
Bobby
12:00PM DEC 16TH 2010
Nelson's out in space these days, and not in an inspiring "oh cool, he's a politician flying in a spaceship" way. What a waste of a Senator. Hope Floridians wise up and show him the airlock....to retirement.
Bailey
10:23AM DEC 16TH 2010
I wouldn't count on LeMieux to be a good conservative OR beating Bill Nelson. He's the Apostle of Charlie Crist, for crying out loud!
Chris
10:45AM DEC 16TH 2010
spent 10 years working for Charlie, helped put Jim Greer in charge of RPOF, even called himself a Charlie Crist Republican. REALLY, you think a guy like lemieux is gonna be the Tea Party's guy? please.
Repubtallygirl
5:44PM DEC 16TH 2010
In one word, NO!
10:13AM DEC 16TH 2010
Nelson, is a hypocrite. He answers some of my emails and telling me how important his vote is and why, but fails to abide by the constitution and the law of the land that his liberal agenda is only for the few. These earmarks are for the few and he should be representing the people of Florida not just the few. I sure hope Senator LeMieux will run and gather steam with the Tea Party. Hopefully, the next two years will very different, but starting in 2013, it will be a total different agenda with a lame duck president and the liberals gone to a great extent. I just hope Florida doesn't vote like Nevada, Mass., Washington and California keeping this liberal in our state.
Paul
9:48AM DEC 16TH 2010
Nelson's so scared of losing it would be funny.........if it weren't so sad to watch. Can't even get his flip-flops straight.