advertisement

SSN on Facebook SSN on Twitter SSN on YouTube RSS Feed

20 Comments
Nancy Smith

Billionaire Leftist George Soros Bought America's Media. Why Hasn't Anybody Noticed?

October 17, 2019 - 8:00am
George Soros
George Soros

Clenched-teeth presidential debaters unloaded Tuesday night on Big Pharma, Big Tech, Big-Almost-Everything -- any industry that pours Big Bucks into influencing American politics. Yet, they skimmed right over the scariest and most sinister big sell-out of all: Big Media.

Where during the CNN/New York Times Democratic debate was the crumbling Fourth Estate, whose downhill slide in the 21st Century has sent it on a desperate treasure hunt for sugar daddies to prop it up?

Why didn't the name George Soros pop up?

Democrats don't talk about Big Media's influence because they're the ones who benefit from it. With the exception of FOX, every one of the most influential national news outlets are campaigning -- I mean really flagrantly campaigning -- for far-left liberal candidates and causes.

Early in the 21st Century, George Soros, net worth $26 billion and No. 46 on Forbes' list of the World's Richest Men, discovered he had enough money and the know-how to buy opinion from ethics-challenged or foundering publishers and individual reporters, outfits large and small. Soros never owned a single media outlet. In a tangled web of lofty-sounding foundations he created to "give to causes he wanted to influence," Big Media in all its evil glory was born. 

It grew like Jack's beanstalk. 

Soros, 89, who made his fortune in investing and currency trading, is pretty much done with bringing money in. Now he makes his name for  handing it out -- in the area of politics and policy. 

Since the 2004 election, when he spent $27 million trying in vain to defeat George W. Bush, the controversial financier has used his influence and billions to push a laundry list of left-wing causes. 

Says the Reston, Va.-based media watchdog organization Media Research Center, "Pick an issue and (Soros') Open Society Foundations (OSF) likely fund the liberal position -- pro-abortion, pro-illegal immigration, pro-national health care, pro-drug legalization, pro-Big Government, anti-Israel and, ultimately, anti-America."

The $27 million "was a drop in the bucket compared to the $8 billion he has donated just to his Open Society Foundations," says the report. Soros followed that presidential failure by earning the well-deserved reputation as one of the top liberal contributors. Soon after the election, "Soros headlined a meeting of 70 millionaires and billionaires in Scottsdale, Ariz., to discuss how to grow the left's ideological assets," explained the Aug. 18, 2005, Christian Science Monitor.

Read the executive summary of Media Research's mind-boggling report, "George Soros: Media Mogul." The Hungarian-born billionaire "has managed to insinuate himself and his money into the media culture, making connections with the nation's top publishing organizations. He has direct ties to more than 30 mainstream news outlets -- including The New York Times, Washington Post, the Associated Press, CNN and ABC. Each one of those operations has employees, often high-level ones, on the boards of Soros-funded media operations."

Soros' "gift" of $1.8 million to National Public Radio became part of the firestorm of controversy that jeopardized NPR’s federal funding. But that gift only hints at the widespread influence the controversial billionaire has on the mainstream media.

The investigative reporting start-up ProPublica is a prime example of Soros' targeted media campaigns. ProPublica, winner of two Pulitzer Prizes, initially was given millions of dollars from the Sandler Foundation to "strengthen the progressive infrastructure" -- "progressive" the code for very liberal. In 2010, it also received a two-year contribution of $125,000 each year from the Open Society Foundations. In case you wonder where that money comes from, the OSF website is www.soros.org. It is a network of more than 30 international foundations, mostly funded by Soros, that have contributed more than $8 billion to those efforts.

ProPublica's stories are thoroughly researched by very good professionals who formerly worked at some of the biggest news outlets in the nation. "But the topics are almost laughably left-wing," says Media Research. "The site's proud list of 'Our Investigations' includes attacks on oil companies, gas companies, the health care industry, for-profit schools and more. More than 100 stories on the latest lefty cause: opposition to drilling for natural gas by hydraulic fracking. Another 100 on the evils of the foreclosure industry.

"Throw in a couple investigations making the military look bad and another about prisoners at Guantanamo Bay and you have almost the perfect journalism fantasy -- a huge budget, lots of major media partners and a liberal agenda unconstrained by advertising."

One more thing: a 14-person Journalism Advisory Board in 2011 was stacked with CNN's David Gergen and representatives from top newspapers, a former publisher of The Wall Street Journal and the editor-in-chief of Simon & Schuster. Several were and are today working journalists, including:

  • Alberto Ibargüen, the former publisher of The Miami Herald, on the board of directors. He's also president and CEO of journalism's prestigious John S. and James L. Knight Foundation.

  • Jill Abramson, a managing editor of The New York Times;

  • Martin D. Baron, the editor of The Boston Globe;

  • David Boardman, the executive editor of the Seattle Times;

  • Kerry Smith, the senior vice president for editorial quality of ABC News;

  • Cynthia A. Tucker, the editor of the editorial page of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

ProPublica is a newer and more prominent example of Soros' opinion buying, but it's far from the only organization the billionaire stacked with members of the supposedly neutral press. There's also the Center for Public Integrity. Its board of directors is filled with working journalists like Christine Amanpour from ABC, right along side blatant liberal media types like Arianna Huffington, of the Huffington Post and now AOL.

"Like ProPublica, the CPI board is a veritable Who's Who of journalism and top media organizations," says Media Research, including:

  • As mentioned, "Amanpour -- Anchor of ABC's Sunday morning political affairs program, 'This Week with Christiane Amanpour.' A reliable lefty, she has called tax cuts 'giveaways,' the Tea Party 'extreme,' and Obama 'very Reaganesque.'

  • "Also as mentioned, Huffington -- Co-founder of the popular left-wing website named after her, The Huffington Post, a nationally syndicated columnist, and thanks to a recent $315 million sale, the person in charge of AOL's news divisions.

  • "Paula Madison -- Executive vice president and chief diversity officer for NBC Universal, who leads NBC Universal's corporate diversity initiatives, spanning all broadcast television, cable, digital, and film properties.

  • "Matt Thompson - Editorial product manager at National Public Radio and, at least in 2011, an adjunct faculty member at the prominent Poynter Institute, owner of the Tampa Bay Times."

The well-known Center for Investigative Reporting follows the same template -- important journalists on the board and a liberal editorial agenda. Both the board of directors and the advisory board contain journalists from major news outlets. The board features:

  • Phil Bronstein (President), San Francisco Chronicle;

  • David Boardman, The Seattle Times;

  • Len Downie, former Executive Editor of the Washington Post, now VP;

  • George Osterkamp, CBS News producer.

  • The Advisory Board features prominent liberal journalists like Bill Moyers, Seymour Hersh of The New Yorker, former '60 Minutes' host Mike Wallace, and representatives of both PBS and NPR.

Why does it all matter? Says Dan Gainor, Media Research's vice president for Business and Culture and author of the report, "Journalists, we are constantly told, are neutral in their reporting. In almost the same breath, many bemoan the influence of money in politics. It is a maxim of both the left and many in the media that conservatives are bought and paid for by business interests. Yet where are the concerns about where their money comes from?"

This is personal to me. I've reached the end of the line in a business I have loved, leaving it in real trouble. I long for the days when reporters began their investigations with questions, not statements. When they set out to find the answers, not prove some assumed, deliberately trumped-up conclusion. If I learned nothing else in 50 years, I learned that nothing is black or white. The life we live and report on is somewhere in the middle.

But, as Media Research's Gainor points out, "George Soros is teaching journalists that their industry has a future as long as he opens his wallet."

The American people may not know all they're missing, but they've sensed for a very long time that the mainstream media have failed them in a society in which "Freedom of the Press" used to mean something. Now they know their instincts were right and they know why. 


Reach Nancy Smith at nsmith@sunshinestatenews.com or at 228-282-2423. Twitter: @NancyLBSmith

Comments

I’ve been warning about him for ten years, Why are we not doing something about this Evil Man, He promised to destroy America

I'm older, I remember when news was a series of facts, covered with no agenda and both/all sides or perspectives of the facts were included. The idea was, the reader is smart enough to do more research, think through what was presented, and naturally grow into taking a position (or not) based on the unbiased report of facts. It was a compliment to say readers could be trusted with information. It allowed acquaintances to have conversations about things and further strengthen or weaken viewpoints. Now, these news reports are designed, crafted, and manipulated to control us, to force us to think as we're told. That's insulting. And wrong.

I find it very interesting that every attack on the article failed to deny Soros' involvement his agenda or with the exception of FOX, every one of the most influential national news outlets are campaigning -- I mean really flagrantly campaigning -- for far-left liberal candidates and causes. Instead they attack radio and local media which they claim have conservative leanings and agendas. Therefore what these critics are saying is, it's OK for George Soros to buy up National Media and spew out his personal political bias from these media sites because everyone knows all media is biased and conservatives have radio and local media in their hands. Despite the laughing by the Democrats who commented upon this article, this is a very serious issue and freedom of the press, as well as freedom of speech may only flourish where there is honest journalism.

I agree with you Carrie Martin. https://www.whatfinger.com links to the best news available.

Sunshine News is the mouthpiece for the Republican Party in Florida. I read it to understand what these guys are saying. Sometimes I glean valuable information on various Florida issues. But your are correct. There is no objectivity here.

Chuckle, chuckle, chuckle! Yeah, MSNBC is the "truth setter"! HA, HA, HA

Fox News doesn't "campaign" for rightwing candidates??? HA, HA, HA !!!

Fox News is not as left-wing as the others, but it's still left-wing.

Great article. Now comes the hard part; how to determine and correctly label which information published in the media is truly reporting vs propaganda. As I recall, the left-leaning broadcasters were all gung-ho for the FCC to implement the Fairness Doctrine on the one area where they hadn't been able to gain an effective foothold - talk radio. After all, as the argument went, isn't there a compelling public interest in requiring that both sides of an issue be reported fairly and without bias? Since this was such an important issue, I'm sure that these same broadcast and print media outlets would leap at the opportunity to set the example and, in the public interest, voluntary adopt this same Fairness Doctrine for themselves. I'll be waiting for that cracking sound of Hell freezing over....

Bring the "Fairness Doctrine" back - and eliminate the "Citizens United" decision with a constitutional amendment. Together, that would be a step in the right direction.

Yes, the little real news that remains should be replaced with left-wing propaganda of the likes of CNNABCNBCCBSNPRMSNBC

https://www.whatfinger.com is the best news aggregator by far.

Trump's BS must be getting to Nancy going off the deep end like this. …………….Claiming Fox News as the truth setter is rather rich as they just parrot Trump's over 13k lies in just 1k days!!………...Nancy have you heard of fact Checking sites?...………...Or are they all Soros lackies too?...…...…..Why are you not talking about Trump, right wing lies? ……......There are so many but you'd rather make up more. ......……...Fact is repubs, the right is based on lies as they can't stand the truth as it would show them for the liars they are............ Until the right can except real facts instead of making stuff up...…………...It is really sad how far down the repub party has fallen completely morally and fiscally bankrupt.

Chuckle, chuckle, chuckle! Yeah, Fox News is the "truth setter"! HA, HA, HA

Ms. Smith, I respect you and the Sunshine State news but I must say I grow weary of the right painting George Soros as the evilest man in the United States. I call your attention to Sinclair Broadcasting who owns nearly 200 TV stations in over 100 markets nationwide. and they give their local anchor's conservative talking points each day., All stations must air commentaries that are Pro-Trump. No other broadcaster owns more stations in more swing states than Sinclair. More people watch local news by a four to one margin than watch CNN, MSNBC or FOX News, so Sinclair is a powerful force in media they in the Trump camp. Now, this is a free country and the folks at Sinclair have every right to frame things as they see them. We can debate their journalist tactics, but that is another topic for another day. There are 1315 news-talk radio stations in the United States and over 70 percent of them are conservative talk stations. Clear Channel Radio, rebranded as iHeart Radio owned by a strongly conservative group out of Texas own the vast majority of the talk stations. Are there liberal media out there? Yes, there are, but for conservatives to continue to cry that they are underrepresented when they dominate local TV, local radio and what is left of the local newspaper business outside of NY, LA and Chicago is laughable.

'Sunshine State News' is definitively a rightwing publication, jeff. There's clearly no journalistic objectivity here - unless it appears in the follow-up posts and comments by some of the readers. (And, you're right! Sinclair Broadcasting is probably worse than Fox News as a purveyor of rightwing propaganda.)

Then go away, unless your two brain cells don't get the irony.

I like https://rantingly.com/ also.

Nice aggregate site, but does not carry any alternative news sites. Sometime I use this site ---http://www.infopig.com/----

I wonder why they deleted the comment about whatfinger.com?

Add new comment

nancy smith
advertisement
advertisement

Chatterbox

advertisement
Live streaming of WBOB Talk Radio, a Sunshine State News Radio Partner.

advertisement
advertisement