Bottled Water Tax Back on Senate Menu
Around the State
Bottled water could get a few cents more expensive in Florida under a proposed surcharge to pay for environmental cleanup work.
The proposal, sponsored by Sen. Evelyn Lynn, R-Ormond Beach, would create a 6 percent tax on a bottle of water or a package of bottled water in order to fund an environmental trust fund that pays for programs to rehabilitate ecosystems and coral reefs and to clean up polluted areas.
“I think it’s very important that we protect the environment as much as we can and plastic bottles are creating all sorts of problems with our wildlife as well as just littering everywhere,” Lynn said Thursday. “And it just seemed an appropriate thing to do.”
Lynn has proposed similar legislation in the past, and outgoing Gov. Charlie Crist in 2009 sought a per-gallon water fee from bottlers in Florida. The bottled water industry, Nestle in particular, fought the proposal and it wound up going nowhere.
Nestle Waters of North America takes in Florida water every day, bottles it and pastes on Deer Park or Zephyrhills labels before shipping it around the country. But it pays nothing to the state of Florida to do so.
The company also is against a surcharge that would be paid by purchasers of water, with company spokesman Jim McClellan calling it “a bad idea, period.”
The legislation may have an uphill battle in the Legislature. Both Senate President Mike Haridopolos and House Speaker Dean Cannon are stridently anti-tax. During a speech to lawmakers last month, Haridopolos said "if your piece of legislation raises a tax … I don’t like your chances.”
Haridopolos spokesman David Bishop told the News Service that the Senate president would not weigh in on each proposed piece of legislation. If senators take an interest in a particular issue, they should file a bill, he said.
“If they can get [it] through three committees and make it to the Senate floor, let the chips fall where they may,” Bishop said.
Lynn, who is a member of Haridopolos’ leadership team, said she was aware of the president’s stance on tax-raising measures, but said she has not heard from him or other high-ranking senators.
“I haven’t heard from them at all, but I just feel that it’s very important and even if it doesn’t pass, it will make a statement,” she said.
The environmental community has largely supported efforts to find a financial source for cleanup efforts, but not all have decided whether to support Lynn’s bill yet, which was filed last week.
Eric Draper, the executive director of Audubon of Florida, said the group was unsure whether to back Lynn’s bill, but only because it might not go far enough. He noted that there are other large users of water, such as golf courses or cities.
“One thing is for sure, we need a source of money for protection for springs and it is kind of a natural … you can see the logic of putting a fee on water to help the springs protection,” he said. “The thing I have not figured out yet is that if we are going to put a fee on water, if we should limit it to bottled water.”
The measure is SB 78. Lynn said House Rep. Michelle Rehwinkel Vasilinda, D-Tallahassee, would be sponsoring the House version.