Columns

Bright Futures a $780,000 Jackpot for Shouping Hu; Students Out of Luck

Popular once-merit-based scholarship program used, abused and screwed
By: Nancy Smith | Posted: June 24, 2011 3:55 AM
 Nancy Smith 150x207Nancy Smith
Please, God, give me three more years. I'll be good. Just let me live to see what Shouping Hu can possibly study about the Bright Futures scholarship program that hasn't been studied 10 times over.

Unless, of course, he's got a plan to snatch it from the greedy clutches of the Florida Legislature. That's what I'll hang on for. That's all I'm hoping for.

Maybe you don't know about Shouping Hu. He's a Florida State University professor who recently applied for a grant to see if Bright Futures can make a difference to post-secondary students' educational opportunities.

Shouping Hu mugShouping Hu in 2010
Certainly it's going to make a difference to his bank account. Did I mention that the Feds are going to pay him $780,000 and give him three years to complete his research?

Try not to think about how much $780,000 could buy for the classroom. Try not to think that all 780,000 of those greenbacks are your tax dollars at work, or that Hu's grant is one of literally thousands of federal grants awarded to study something in a college or university laboratory -- not all of it with life or death or even marginally urgent implications.

Yet, when all is said and done, I'm probably less appalled by the absurdity of the grant's dollar value in a struggling economy than I am in the idea that Bright Futures' overwhelming success should have eroded into a case study. After 14 years this scholarship program -- one of the most popular legislative initiatives of the last several decades in Florida -- should have proved itself. In fact, it has. The 2011 Legislature should not have left it shredded on the Capitol floor.

I've said all this before, forgive me for saying it again.

In the late 1980s voters approved a lottery for Florida primarily because those who sponsored the ballot initiative promised the proceeds would go to bolster education, not replace money the state held back.

It didn't happen. In fact, that broken promise was a bone that stuck in the craw of voters for 10 years -- until 1997 when Ken Pruitt, then in the House, and Don Sullivan in the Senate, crafted and sponsored Bright Futures.

Pay close attention here, Professor Hu.

Bright Futures was funded with 25 percent of the state's lottery proceeds, with an understanding that the scholarship program could grow to 50 percent without touching the lottery's payouts or administrative costs.

It paid 75 percent of tuition and fees to Florida students who maintained a B average in high school and scored 970 or better on the SAT.

It offered a glorious promise to families that previously couldn't dream of university education for their children. And it offered a golden incentive for students -- call it a promise -- that if they played by the rules, worked hard and did well, they could have a college education.

It offered the American dream.

And for the past 14 years, thousands of students have been motivated to work hard in high school in order to realize their dream of attending a Florida university. Many of Florida's best and brightest students have made the decision to stay in the Sunshine State because of Bright Futures. That was one of the goals. Trust me on that. I have very personal knowledge that the strategy worked.

Comments (10)

Tom Major
7:24PM JUN 28TH 2011
We the taxpaying citizens of Florida can't allow this to continue without a fight! Contact your legislators immediately and continuosly! I'm almost certain there probaly isn't an honest one left, but perhaps involving as many citizens as possible will make a difference!

We now have another obstacle in the path with Rick Scott the former CEO of HCA/Columbia, the corporation that ran the largest medicaid and medicare fraud in U.S. history. I still have to ask the question, who voted this criminal in office, and why?
HD
9:58PM JUN 24TH 2011
The issue with Bright Futures is that most of the money goes to kids who can afford college - and would have gone to college anyway. My kids could afford to go anywhere and yet they had Bright Futures available. In those cases it is welfare for the rich - paying for kids who would already be attending college and who have the money to pay their own way. I assume the Feds are studying this to have some factual basis to either expand the program nationally or improve how it works. If the program was means-tested would it do a better job of expanding opportunity and allowing kids who can't afford college to attend? Hopefully that is the purpose of the study - to determine whether a plan that pays for millionaires' kids to go to college expands opportunities more than one focused on poor and middle class children. Or whether the kids who meet the criteria would be in college anyway. Too much of what Government does is based on politics and not sound research.
Beg to Differ
3:47PM JUN 26TH 2011
HD, all university tuition is expensive, especially if you have more than one child going at the same time. We fall in the middle class range and could have used the help. Instead, our children will be lumbered with college loans to pay off. With no incentive to keep them in Florida, they chose to go to school out of state (they are twins who entered college in September 2010). It was not cheaper but it was not more expensive, either. My daughter wants to be a doctor, my son an economist. Their chances of returning after graduation to practice in Florida are not likely. I am a bitter parent. I counted on Bright Futures. My children missed many opportunities because they wanted to study to keep their grades up for the scholarship. We scrape by but we will not be so poor we qualify for the new and unimproved Bright Futures. Shame on the legislature. Thank you, Nancy for trying to fight for us.
JR
1:27PM JUN 27TH 2011
It is absurd what the legislature is doing with the Bright Futures Scholarship. Try paying for four kids to go to college, that is a ton of money and regardless of class, anyone who meets the criteria academically speaking and maintains it in college deserves to receive the scholarship. The problem with society is that they constantly give do those who are undeserving. Having a merit based scholarship like this is an amazing thing that creates competition, hard work, and gives these kids the realization of how the real world is. You can't on handouts forever.
Stephen Kennedy
6:24PM JUN 24TH 2011
A classic case of fixing something that was never broken. Why keep the best, brightest students in the state, and give them a chance to become well-educated in the universities that their families' tax dollars support? They might vote against you, someday.
DR ELI WHITE
7:39PM JUN 24TH 2011
I KNOW THAT THE STATE IS CRITICALLY SHORT ON FUNDS. BUT TO CUT A PROGRAM THAT INVESTS IN THE FUTURE OF OUR YOUNG PEOPLE AND THE FUTURE ECONOMICS OF THIS STATE AND COUNTRY IS TRULY SHORTSIGHTED. I SEE TOO MANY WORKERS BY THE SIDE OF THE ROAD LOUNGING ON THEIR SHOVELS AND CLERKS IN STATE AND COUNTY OFFICES LOUNGING AROUND TO BELIEVE THAT CUTS CAN'T BE MADE ELSEWHERE.
Tom Major
7:31PM JUN 28TH 2011
The program is supported 100% by lottery proceeds. It is not funded by the state of Florida through tax revenues or any other gov't collected revenues. therefore it is unnecessary for the state to cut funding anywhere to support it!
12:35PM JUN 24TH 2011
Regarding this opinion article and Florida State legislators RAIDING lottery funds designated for middle class merit students.

Just today, news reports talk about Clark County, Nevada SUING the state for taking some of their funds in a “grab”similar to the lottery grab in Florida. And, that is after a “Clean Water Coalition” sued Nevada State for grabbing $68-million of their allocated funds and they WON.

So, it is possible to sue Florida State for all these funding grabs and win???
BM
8:38AM JUN 24TH 2011
Nancy,
It appears that the Florida Legislature has a complex. They are treating Bright Futures like the Federal Government treats Social Security.

These people are a disgrace. Both my children received Bright Futures. One received 100% and the other is currently receiving 75%. What people do not understand is this is just for tuition. The student i.e. must pay for housing, books, food, fees (which are ballooning), transportation, etc. etc. etc. So the Bright Futures program is a big help to working parents and for children who must pay their own way.

Shame on Florida for allowing our Legislature to screw this up. Now is the time to take it back.
C. Segers
9:50AM JUN 24TH 2011
I agree wholeheartedly. My son has made excellent grades all through high school, and has great test scores. The Bright Futures Scholarship is not near enough to help cover his education, like it could have been in the past. We make just a little too much to get federal aid, but yet we are struggling to help our son as he gets ready for college. We don't know how we are going to cover all of the expenses, and he will be living at home!