Politics
Buddy Roemer Launches Group to Fight for Political Reform and Term Limits
Around the State

Buddy Roemer
Roemer first set his eyes on the Republican nomination but, after being left out of the debates, he went third party as he attempted to snag the nomination with Americans Elect and the Reform Party. With Americans Elect opting not to run a presidential candidate in 2012, Roemer ended his presidential bid.
This week, Roemer announced that he was launching a new group, the Reform Project, which will continue his fight over the issues he raised in his campaign -- namely, political and campaign finance reform. Roemer also vowed to fight for term limits for elected federal officials.
“The Reform Project is a nonpartisan, anti-corruption organization fighting both the unfair use of money in our political system and the undemocratic developments occurring in our republic,” Roemer announced to supporters in an email sent out this week. “We will bring about reform through the use of technology and by the power of the people.”
Roemer also unveiled a video in which he talks about why he founded the new nonprofit group.
Looking back at his presidential campaign, Roemer insisted that he had scored a victory for his cause, maintaining that he had gained “a place at the table in the national debate” for his issues. “We ran one heck of a campaign,” Roemer insisted, though he added that he was a “lousy candidate.”
Roemer was elected to the U.S. House in 1980 as a Democrat before running for governor in 1987. During his term in Baton Rouge, Roemer jumped over to the Republicans but lost out in his bid for a second term in 1991. Roemer backed Democrat Edwin Edwards over the Republican who bested him in the primary -- former state Rep. David Duke, who had been affiliated with the Ku Klux Klan. After an unsuccessful comeback attempt in 1995 for another term as governor, Roemer went on to serve as both president and CEO of Business First Bank in Baton Rouge. While he remained on the political sidelines for a decade, Roemer re-emerged in 2008 as a prominent supporter of John McCain’s presidential bid before launching his own campaign in 2012.
Despite his lack of success on the campaign trail, Roemer shows no signs of heading back to the political sidelines.
“This soft launch of the Reform Project is only the beginning,” Roemer insisted. “We are in the process of building a highly-interactive website that will be launched next month. This website will help organize and activate a powerful grassroots movement that will reform America. Together, we will combat the corruption and call out our elected officials who sell out to the special interests and we will praise those who put their country first.”
Sorry, you need to install flash to see this content.
Reach Kevin Derby at kderby@sunshinestatenews.com or at (850) 727-0859.

Comments (2)
For starters, he did at best, a "passable job" in Minnesota as Governor. To his credit, he governed one of the more liberal states in the union. Most conclude that even with Pawlenty on the ticket, the "Gopher state" would stay with Obama and the Democrats.
Pawlenty is pure Republican Establishment. The Tea parties and conservative base find little about him that excites them. He had a golden opportunity early in the primary when he called Mitt Romney out on healthcare. Remember "Obamaromneycare?" In the debate, however, he didn't follow up, giving Romney the ultimate pass when he could have inflicted a mortal wound!
This action in itself left the impression of weakness and the reluctance to confront opposition. Many voters concluded that Pawlenty was "a nice buy but a wet dish rag."
True, Romney and Pawlenty's wives are friends. Without a doubt, Romney has little respect for the Tea Parties. He would be comfortable with Pawlenty at his side. The question becomes, "would Mitt be comfortable losing the election?"
Pawlenty brings no help with groups that Romney is weakest. These include "women under 45, Hispanics, Millinials(voters under 30), "blue collar" Democrats, and "new" Americans(immigrants and first generation Americans). He brings "marginal help at best" with Evangelicals.
Logically, Romney needs a Southerner on the ticket. Massachusetts and Minnesota are two states that Obama will likely carry. There is a prevailing idea that Romney looks "down his nose" at Southerners and Hispanics. If he is unable to change this perception, he loses the election.
It seems that the party is running away from the part of the country that consistently votes Republican! I think that if Obama wins, the GOP as we know it, will "go the way of the Whig party." A "Romney-Pawlenty ticket" might be the ticket to achieving that dubious destiny.
This article doesn't even mention Pawlenty, the VP spot or even the Romney ticket.
Leave a Comment on This Story