Government
Casinos to Attract Majority of Current Tourist Dollars Wherever They Open
Around the State
Seminole Hard Rock Casino | Sunshine State News ArchivesTwo-thirds to three-quarters of those expected to visit mega-casinos being proposed for Southeast Florida will likely have diverted their time -- and their money -- from other destinations in the region, state economists projected Friday afternoon.
That is, if the casinos are limited to just Miami-Dade and Broward counties.
The state’s Revenue Estimating Conference, which has yet to settle on the potential economic impact of the gaming bill, projected that the three mega-casinos could attract 823,150 to 1.65 million new visitors a year to the state.
At the same time, 4.4 million to 10.6 million people who now regularly visit the Sunshine State could be expected to redirect their travel plans -- and money -- to include the gambling venues.
The projections would appear to give some credence to arguments that have been made by the Florida Chamber of Commerce and Disney, which lead the organized opposition to the destination resort bills -- HB 487 and SB 710 -- filed by Rep. Erik Fresen, R-Miami, and Sen. Ellyn Bogdanoff, R-Fort Lauderdale.
The business groups claim the casinos would cut into the family-friendly image of the state and divert tourist dollars from existing businesses rather than attract more people to Florida.
The conference members hope to be able to set a revenue projection when they meet again next Friday.
“We’re getting close to getting numbers we can agree to,” said Amy Baker, the state’s chief economist.
Numbers that are being considered range from the low-end fiscal impact of $51.7 million in fiscal year 2014, growing to $70.3 million in fiscal year 2016, to highs of $60.7 million in 2014, growing to $137.1 million in 2016.
The projections are based upon the casinos opening in 2015.
Through a compact with the state, the Florida Seminoles, and pari-mutuels, paying 35 percent on revenue, now produce an estimated $393 million a year -- $343 million guaranteed -- for the state.
The majority of that revenue would be eliminated if the Seminole compact is reduced or abruptly ended and the pari-mutuels see diminished play.
Meanwhile, beyond one-time application fees of $1 million and certain licensing fees, the three proposed casinos are projected to generate about $214.7 million a year for state coffers each year through a 10 percent tax on earnings, according to numbers released Friday.
Each scenario is based upon three casinos being built, with the operators having to build a $2 billion facility.
State economists have not been asked to consider variations on the revenues percentages that are now required from pari-mutuels. Pari-mutuels operators have requested the 35 percent rate be put more on par with the casinos, which would be charged 10 percent under the bill.
A key number for the revenue is first-time visitors to the state attracted by the casinos.
“Those, in terms of economist multipliers and sales tax multipliers, have the biggest impact on the estimate,” Baker said. “Every dollar they spend in Florida wouldn’t have been available except for the existence of the destination resorts.”
So, from the estimating conference's standpoint, shifting tourist dollars from one attraction to another doesn’t change projected revenue in terms of hotel stays and sales taxes.
Many unknowns remain about the potential economic impact of allowing three mega-casinos to open in Florida.
The economists lump all out-of-state tourists as simply being from out of state, rather than projecting if they come from other states or foreign nations. International tourists generally spend more than domestic visitors.
A big question is where the casinos may end up.
The economists don’t believe the bill limits the casinos to strictly Miami-Dade and Broward counties.

Comments (0)