Politics

Confederate Group Wins Florida License Plate Skirmish in Federal Court

Judge calls legislative interference in issuing specialty tags unconstitutional
By: Kenric Ward | Posted: March 31, 2011 3:19 PM
Confederate license plate

Florida Confederate license plate

In a decision that could affect the issuance of future specialty license plates in Florida, a federal judge overturned the state's rejection of a Confederate tag.

Judge John Antoon said the state acted unconstitutionally in rejecting a specialty plate for the Sons of Confederate Veterans. The group had paid the requisite fees and complied with all conditions applicable to the sale of the tag, but the Legislature blocked its issuance.

"By placing unfettered discretion in the hands of government officials to grant or deny access to a public forum, section 320.08053, Florida Statutes, creates a threat of censorship that by its very existence chills free speech," wrote Antoon, a judge in the Middle District of Florida.

"This threat of censorship is heightened when the speech at issue is controversial, as it is in this case.  Indeed, the fact that the speech is controversial strikes at the very heart of First Amendment protections," the judge stated.

"Accordingly, because section 320.08053 (2009) implicates private speech rights and provides the Legislature with unfettered discretion to engage in viewpoint discrimination when declining to approve a specialty license plate application, it is unconstitutional under the overbreadth doctrine."

Orlando attorney Fred O'Neal, who represented the SCV, said in an e-mail:

"We had hoped the judge would have ordered the DMV to issue our plate directly (i.e., without legislative approval) or, in the alternative, to shut the door for everyone else by declaring the statute creating the approval process unconstitutional (i.e., if we can't get our plate issued, then no one should be able to get a plate issued). The judge went with the latter."

John Adams, head of the Florida SCV, said Confederate license plates have been issued in nearly a dozen other states, including two versions in Virginia. A survey by the SCV indicated that as many as 30,000 Floridians would purchase the plate.

Adams criticized the Florida Legislature for "arbitrary and capricious" action in rejecting the SCV tag, which had received administrative approval from the Department of Motor Vehicles.

A state report signaled trouble back in 2004 when it was suggested that legislative involvement could politicize the process -- a problem identified in Judge Antoon's decision.

"I'm working the phones to get this [plate] amended onto another license plate bill. Ultimately, the rest of this statute has to get cleaned up," Adams said.

--

Contact Kenric Ward at kward@sunshinestatenews.com or at (772) 801-5341.
Attachments: 

Comments (14)

Annette Ford
2:54PM MAR 19TH 2013
So, when will the tag be issued? The judge's ruling is of no value unless the tag is issued and sold in Florida.
Steven
12:08PM APR 8TH 2011
I'm a cadet attending one of the few military schools, The Citadel, that partook in the Civil War for the Confederacy, and I'm a proud Southerner from Wauchula, Florida, and I'm the Lt. Commander of the Star of the West Camp #1253 at The Citadel. I had two ancestors that fought for the Republic of Florida during the Civil War, and one of the was an officer. I have to say: If you have a problem with the state of Florida getting an SCV tag because it's considered wrong in your eyes... Leave. No matter where you go in the South, you'll find either the Stars and Bars, or the Confederate Naval Jack flying somewhere in each state. I'm proud that we're getting an SCV tag, because the only other college in Florida that fought in the Civil War for the CSA was Florida State University (look for "The Battle of Natural Bridge), and that's what I have on my car now.
girl from the south
2:20AM APR 6TH 2011
I say way to go. Im so sick of hearing "oh we suffered ", NO you didn't maybe your ancestors. But lets get the facts right here the white man was not the 1st to own slaves . It was a black man that sold the slaves to the white people so if you want to hate take a long look at who and where it started . I would put that tag on my truck any day. Be proud of where your came from its what made you who you re today.
Dee
2:03AM APR 5TH 2011
Having a distant relative that fought to keep slavery is a sense of family shame, not pride. There is nothing more un-American than the confederacy
Lina smith
7:29AM OCT 11TH 2011
I am very impressed to your post and appreciate to you also such a great sharing. buy book report | Admission essay help | thesis help
Robert Lloyd
9:01AM APR 5TH 2011
>>There is nothing more un-American than the confederacy .<<

Dee: If you are referring to THIS America, I certainly agree. The Confederate Sates of America, and the original United States of America, would not resemble this current socialist mess we now have. Thank you for pointing this out.
Pat
9:55PM APR 1ST 2011
You know I beleive that the tag is a very good idea to show who we are, we don't hate any one. We are a God fearing people.
Dee
2:00AM APR 5TH 2011
Having a relative that fought to keep slavery alive is a source of family shame, not pride
Jamey Creel
9:13AM APR 27TH 2011
So Dee, tell what was north fighting for?
Lady Val
2:19PM APR 1ST 2011
First, this ruling makes constitutional sense as well as commonsense. For the government (at any level) to go about attempting to enforce political correctness on behalf of some and against others is totally "unAmerican." Indeed NO person who cherishes liberty should wish to deny freedom to another whatever the issue. And secondly, let us hope that this puts to an end the silly understanding of all things Southern in general and Confederate in particular as being "racist" (a term coined by Leon Trotsky) or "hate speech," a concept that is as unAmerican as censorship. Those fixated on fighting any expression of Southern history or heritage would be better employed looking at what is going on today in their neighborhoods and spending time helping out where they can rather than minding other folks' business that has nothing whatsoever to do with them. There are a lot of displays and agendas from a lot of advocacy groups that "offend" me, but I believe in the freedom of the people involved in those groups to have their own symbols displayed if that is what they wish. Unless there are credible threats of injury, being offended should not count as a reason to circumscribe First Amendment rights.
2:02PM APR 1ST 2011
Civil, Constitutional rights & Due process should be equal for all under the law. Is that not what the Civil Rights battles of the 1960's was all about? When one group unfairly discriminates again another all lovers of freedom should be concerned as when it's ok to discriminate & denies rights to one group, who is next?
I'm sure the SCV will use the money raised from tag sales to continue to educate the public on the issues concerning the war in 1861-1865 and honor the memory of the AMERICAN VETERANS who fought in the war.
Last, if you are offended with the subject of the tag, besides being in need of a history lesson, DON"T BUY THE TAG.
David McCallister
1:46PM APR 1ST 2011
This ruling is fine, as far as it goes. the next step is to get the plate itself. This ruling can be used to advocate for fairness towards Confederate issues in other contexts as well.
Robert Lloyd
11:00AM APR 1ST 2011
It is interesting to note that this same issue has been litigated previously in other states successfully, yet some bureaucrat in Tallahasssee attempted to circumvent the First Amendment using our tax dollars. Who is this person in the Florida government and why is he not fired?

I hope and pray Gov. Scott cuts that destructive and wastful salary.
PattyTeaParty
6:34PM MAR 31ST 2011
You gotta give it to Fred O'Neal and Doug Guetzloe, another stunning victory for the good guys.

Leave a Comment on This Story

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.