Columns

Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Women: Talk About Selective Memory

By: Nancy Smith | Posted: April 10, 2012 3:55 AM
I Beg to Differ
It isn't easy to argue with selective-memory Democrats like Debbie Wasserman Schultz. But when she wagged her finger at Republicans for waging "a war on women," I decided to have a go.

Absolutely had to.

Interviewed Sunday on CNN's State of the Union, Wasserman Schultz told millions of Americans, "The focus of the Republicans on turning back the clock for women really is something that's unacceptable and shows how callous and insensitive they are toward women's priorities."

The chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee intimated that Democrats wouldn't do that. Not in a million. "We have too much respect for women."

Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Debbie Wasserman Schultz | Credit: Gage Skidmore - Flickr

Well, not all women, right, Congresswoman? What you meant to say is, Democrats have respect for their kind of women. They respect the ones who fit their own definition, yes. But the others? Featherheads and fools.

Do you think Wasserman Schultz, who represents Florida's 20th District in Congress, concerns herself for a moment with the plight of Democratic targets like Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch of Wisconsin?

Where do you think Kleefisch fits into that "war on women" that Democrats see the Republicans ramping up?

Wisconsin Democrats -- Big Labor, the White House, liberal media -- are ready to chop off her head and display it on a pole. They want her recalled in June along with Gov. Scott Walker. Please don't ask me why.

As far as I can tell, Kleefisch has done nothing but her job. But apparently she's the "wrong kind" of woman for the Dems -- a fiscal and social conservative elected with the strong backing of the tea party in the Badger State. Which, in their eyes, makes her dumber than a breadstick.

She is anything but.

In a brief telephone interview Monday, Kleefisch told Sunshine State News she saw Wasserman Schultz on CNN bemoan the plight of women. "She claims women are under attack from the Republicans," said Kleefisch. "I can't speak for the others, but here's one woman, me, who knows what it's like to come under fire from the Democrats. I've felt their sting and I'm doing all I can to fight back.

"It's not easy fighting back as the Lone Ranger, but I'm getting used to it."

Rebecca Kleefisch

Rebecca Kleefisch

The Wisconsin lieutenant governor is a former small-business woman, a former TV anchor, a 36-year-old colon cancer survivor with two children and a yen to serve the people of her state. When she says she's fighting back, believe it.

But it's a muddy row she hoes. She faces opposition from a web of liberal detractors, including Wisconsin radio host John "Sly" Sylvester and his relentlessly smutty patter.

According to Michelle Malkin, columnist and author of "Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks & Cronies," among other outlandishness, Sylvester "accused Kleefisch of performing 'fellatio on all the talk-show hosts in Milwaukee' and sneered that she had 'pulled a train' (a crude phrase for gang sex)."

Malkin praises Kleefisch "for doing quiet work on economic development that has reaped untold dividends for the state."

Where are feminists like Wasserman Schultz to jump to her defense against the likes of union-backed Sylvester? What about the war against this woman? Wrong party, I guess. Wrong ideology. Apparently, no war.



Reach Nancy Smith at nsmith@sunshinestatenews.com or at (850) 727-0859.











Comments (10)

Ed Fulop
6:29PM APR 10TH 2012
Where were the Liberals when Sarah Palin was called "ignorant"? Oh, yeah . . . . they were the ones saying it. Where were the Liberal when Nikki Haley was called a "slut"? Oh, yeah . . . . they were the ones saying it. Where were the Liberals when Christine O'Donnell was being called a "sorcerer" and "witch"? Oh, yeah . . . . they were the ones saying it. Apparently, you can't be a conservative woman who understands womens issues, the same way a conservative black isn't
"down for the struggle". Independents, do your homework. Don't rely on Jon Stewart and Steven Colbert for your opinion.
Frank
9:31PM APR 10TH 2012
I was willing to give you some leeway on Nikki Haley since I hadn't really followed her race. However, after researching it from multiple sources, it clearly appears to have been fellow good ole' boy Republicans who were calling Ms. Haley those vile names, including the term you referenced. Nothing like Republicans self-destructing and then going and trying to blame "Liberals" for not getting involved and bailing them out!
Frank
8:18PM APR 10TH 2012
"Liberals" don't need to be name calling against the Sarah Palin, Christine O'Donnell, Michelle Malkin, Janice Brewer, Ann Coulter, and Michelle Bachmanns of the world - they simply need to let them self destruct on their own, as they continue to do, time after time after time in their own words. Maybe we just need to take the time to repeat those words here and let the chips fall where they may. We can do the same and compare Ms. Schultz's and Mr. West's rhetoric against each other and see exactly who's name-calling. Afterall, that would only be fair and balanced.
Liv B.
2:29PM APR 10TH 2012
This isn't even a logical comparison. You're comparing a political campaign against a specific person, for a political position to legislation passed on religious beliefs, that not everyone shares and that should play no role in government policy, that effects all women. These two scenarios aren't comparable. This is an absurd argument.
Frank
12:59PM APR 10TH 2012
So a "no war on women" finding, all without even a mention of Republicans expousing the banning or non-coverage of contraceptions, reguiring women to pay for unnecessary medical procedures, and the like. Very logical, very scientific, very reasoned, very red herring. Rebecca Kleefisch is under recall in Wisconsin for actions of her own making, including demonizing gays (comparing gay marriage to marrying a table...or a dog), to the point that even her own uncle, Chris Pfauser, told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that he was so angry with his niece's remarks that he donated $500 to her Democratic opponent, Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett. Perhaps we'll just let the Wisconsin voters decide about Rebecca. Oh, and about that war on women - maybe you should just take a wee look at the Romney vs. Obama support from women - unless of course all those women are just brainwashed by Democrats. Reality hurts, doesn't it?
Jazz
12:45PM APR 10TH 2012
Debbie, stop your support for private prisons! Tell CCA GO AWAY!

w w w dot mycuentame dot org/debbiesaynotocca?page=2
G. Lando
12:35PM APR 10TH 2012
Kleefisch is certainly a lovely and courageous woman, successful too. I remember a speech of hers that told women who were pregnant as the result of rape, that when life gives you lemons, you should make lemon aid.
She has no understanding or compassion for women. Rape is a violent crime against women. It is not one of life's little lemons, and pregnancy resulting from rape is not life's little lemon aid. And she calls herself an victim of democrats, she did it to herself!
George Blumel
10:14AM APR 10TH 2012
This hopefully comes out right:

DWS is a classic party hack --she follows the party line without the slightest concern for truth. She is seemingly oblivious to her constant contradictions and double-standards.

The example of Rebecca Kleefisch is apt but an even more egregious example of the Dems inhumanity to women is their vicious attacks on Sarah Palin --and for what? Being successful, smart, attractive and a religious wife and mother. Oh yes, and conservative.
George Blumel
10:11AM APR 10TH 2012
DWS is a classic party hack --she follows the party line without the slightest concern for truth. She is seemingly oblivious to her constant contradictions and double-standards.

The example of Rebecca Kleefisch is apt but an even more egregious example of the Dems inhumanity to women is their vicious attacks on Sarah Palin --and for what? Being successful, smart, conservative and a religious wife and mother. Oh yes, and cDWS is a classic party hack --she follows the party line without the slightest concern for truth. She is seemingly oblivious to her constant contradictions and double-standards.

The example of Rebecca Kleefisch is apt but an even more egregious example of the Dems inhumanity to women is their vicious attacks on Sarah Palin --and for what? Being successful, smart, attractive and a religious wife and mother. Oh yes, and attractive. They hate that.
.
Al Dawson
8:22AM APR 10TH 2012
Why on God's green earth would anyone listen to the likes of Wasserman Schultz? David Mamet had a term for her type: brain dead liberal. Any party that has a cheerleader like DWS is not to be taken seriously. Amazing how the Dems get a pass on muckraking women who don't fit the profile of the ideal woman (think Boxer, Pelosi, Clinton, etc.-- beauties all).

Leave a Comment on This Story

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.