SSN on Facebook SSN on Twitter SSN on YouTube RSS Feed

Nancy Smith

DWS to New Hampshire: No Democratic Debate for You

January 27, 2016 - 2:15pm
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Debbie Wasserman Schultz

You didn't really think Debbie Wasserman Schultz was off the hook, did you? This is a Democratic National Committee chairwoman who has a job getting out of her own way.

So, it isn't surprising DWS crushed cohosts MSNBC and the New Hampshire Union Leader by telling them Tuesday that an additional debate in New Hampshire ahead of the early-voting state's primary is pretty much out of the question.

"We have no plans to sanction any further debates before the upcoming First in the Nation caucuses and primary, but will reconvene with our campaigns after those two contests to review our schedule," Wasserman Schultz said in a statement, referring to the early-voting states of Iowa and New Hampshire. "Our three major candidates are already scheduled to appear on the same stage next week for the New Hampshire Democratic Party dinner on February 5th."

I Beg to DifferThe New Hampshire Union Leader announced Tuesday it was set to partner with MSNBC to host a Democratic debate Feb. 4, just five days before the state's primary, CNN reports. Joseph McQuaid, the publisher of the Union Leader, said it would be the first time in 32 years that the people of the Granite State would not have a Democratic debate before heading to the polls.

"Our readers have demanded a debate to help them see who is most fit to be the Democratic nominee for President," the paper quoted Joseph W. McQuaid, it president and publisher, as saying. "We were always concerned that this would have been the first time in 32 years without a Democratic debate before the New Hampshire primary. We are glad to partner with MSNBC to ensure Granite Staters have the information they need to make a critical decision on Feb. 9."

All three of the major campaigns reacted positively, although only Martin O'Malley definitively said that he would participate. "Hillary Clinton would be happy to participate in a debate in New Hampshire if the other candidates agree, which would allow the DNC to sanction the debate," Clinton communications director Jennifer Palmieri said, according to The Hill.

But the DNC has an exclusivity clause that requires candidates to only participate in sanctioned debates -- and we know who rules the roost there. Those who break that rule risk being suspended from other Democratic debates.

DNC insiders said last week the Iowa debate was scheduled only "because it was clear Hillary had lost the one before and with Vermont Independent Bernie Sanders surging, Debbie wanted to give her a do-over."

Wasserman Schultz, who has been under fire for not expanding the debates beyond the six that are on the schedule that has been perceived as an advantage to Clinton, also struck a defensive tone in her statement, saying, “Here are the facts. Democratic debates this cycle have far exceeded the viewership of debates in past competitive primaries. Our October debate in Nevada set a Democratic primary record with 15.8 million viewers, the sixth-biggest non-sport cable broadcast in U.S. history, while our most recent debate on NBC was the third highest-rated debate in Democratic primary history with 12.5 million viewers including broadcast and online streaming."

What DWS omitted: In terms of ratings, however, the NBC debate, scheduled on an NFL playoff weekend, came in behind "Madam Secretary," which was running in the same time slot on CBS.

Reach Nancy Smith at or at 228-282-2423. Twitter: @NancyLBSmith



You do realize that this is the only way that the Clinton campaign can refuse the challenge to four debates and save face, right? This is the only way any of them can try to survive this. DWS doesn't want anymore scrutiny and can't afford to take anymore risks, so in a way she's still working with the Clinton campaign. This is probably the smartest move the Clinton campaign has made in a while.

"DWS" = "Dumb Woman Supremicist"

Hard for you to actually see a great woman, working for all of us. But then, focus on trivia is not helping the nation survive.

DWS isn't worth the snot of a camel. How do people in her district even vote, continuously, for her? A poor example of a politician, and now she's wanting to prove she has some value by ruling over the Democrats, most of who, want nothing to do with her!

DWS is a prime example of a lazy electorate. Just keep voting for the person in office because its for the party.

So, what are you? Some kind of desert nomad or something? Did you ever try to push one of those camels through the eye of a needle?

What an idiotic comment

maybe the GOP is paying her more to ruin you than you pay to work for you?

Comments are now closed.

nancy smith


Live streaming of WBOB Talk Radio, a Sunshine State News Radio Partner.