Politics

Environmental Groups Want Guaranteed $10 Billion Expenditure in State Constitution

By: Michael Peltier News Service of Florida | Posted: August 8, 2012 3:55 AM
Eric Draper

Eric Draper

Future funding for Everglades restoration and other environmental programs would be enshrined in the state Constitution under a ballot initative proposal to guarantee the spending of $10 billion on such programs over the next 20 years.

Frustrated over withering funds for the state's marquee land-buying program, Florida Forever, and sporadic funding for a host of other environmental concerns from drinking water and springs to beaches and historic sites, a coalition of environmental groups on Tuesday launched a volunteer effort to begin gathering signatures to put the issue on the ballot in 2014. 

Dubbed the Florida Water and Land Legacy Campaign, the petition drive is being pushed by a coalition of groups that include the Trust for Public Land, the Sierra Club, the Nature Conservancy, 1000 Friends of Florida, and Defenders of Wildlife.

"We've been left with no options," said Eric Draper, executive director of Audubon of Florida. 

For years, lawmakers set aside about $300 million a year for land-buying, but have rejected that type of spending in the economic downturn of the most recent few years. Since 2009, the state has set aside a total of $23 million for Florida Forever. In 2012, lawmakers earmarked only $8.5 million and prohibited state officials from buying new land. 

“When it comes to dedicating funding to protect Florida’s environment, the Great Recession has led to a complete depression," said Manley Fuller, president of the Florida Wildlife Federation, in a statement. "State funding to protect our most precious natural resources has slowed to a trickle.”

The amendment would require that 33 percent of all document tax revenue be earmarked for Everglades restoration and other environmental programs for the next 20 years. The proposal would go into effect July 1, 2015. Collections would be deposited into the state's Land Acquisition Trust Fund, not general revenue.

Before any vote, the group must gather at least 676,811 signatures to put the issue on the ballot. The Florida Supreme Court would also have to approve the ballot title and summary and determine that it satisfies the state's single subject rule, which prohibits citizen petitions from encompassing multiple issues. 

The court, however, won't review the ballot language until the coalition has turned in more than 67,811 signatures, a milestone Draper said the group hopes to complete by the end of the year. Once on the ballot, it would have to be approved by at least 60 percent of voters. 

Since its inception, Florida Forever and its predecessor, Preservation 2000, have funded the purchase of more than 2.5 million acres of environmentally sensitive lands, according to the Department of Environmental Protection. Since July 2001, Florida Forever has acquired more than 682,000 acres of land at a cost of $2.9 billion.

Comments (7)

wbp
12:50PM AUG 10TH 2012
these funds were originally designated for environment use to start with. they are now used by the legislature to fund whatever they think is important and that is not the environment. this amendment would still only restore 33 % of the money to dedicated funds for which they were originally intended. it's a great idea to keep the legislature from further destroying the state and turning it over to developers for a buck.
Gladesman
1:24AM AUG 9TH 2012
This is another technique to rob elected officials of their authority. We elect representatives to make spending decisions and this initiative is an end run around our basic form of government. If we don't like what elected officials do then we fire them on election - it is that simple.

This is an easy way out while at the same time seriously undermining the right to vote and our basic form of government.

Collier County Florida is over 90 % government controlled land. Sounds more like Russia then America.
wbp
1:06PM AUG 10TH 2012
While i can't find out thru research if your 90% figure is accurate i can tell you most of collier county is the florida everglades. destroy the everglades you destroy the water supply for south florida and forget the florida keys, wouldn't be any point in going. russia i think not.
gladesman
9:34PM AUG 13TH 2012
The 90% info may not be perfect but it is quite close and darn sure close enough for this discussion. My main concern is that elected officials (good or bad) are tasked with directing limited state revenues and that amendments like this weaken our system of governance which I believe is why it is being proposed. Environmentalists refuse steadfastly to accept that their minority desires and views are not the desires of the majority (who elected officials respond to) therefore they propose this to circumvent our system. End of Story.
Frank
10:29PM AUG 8TH 2012
Yeah, 60 million tourists don't come to Florida each year because of our environment, do they?

Yeah, South Florida doesn't require protection and restoration of the Everglades to maintain its economic vitality, now does it?

Yeah, the Florida Forever and its predecessor that was run at about $300 million/year wasn't the envy of most states in the country, now were they?

Yeah, and doc stamps (from development) don't have anything to do with our disappearing natural lands and habitat, now do they?

Not sure it'll get 60%, but I think it likely it'll be above 50%, based on prior polls in Florida. It represents about 0.72% of the 2012 state budget, from a dedicated revenue source - - doc stamps.
Henry Rogers, ACL, CCIM
12:19PM AUG 8TH 2012
To lock in roughly one percent of the state budget for a non emergency item for 20 years without the ability of the legislature to control it would be a great error. How much conversation land is enough? The GSA is studying excess federal holdings with the intent of reducing them.

In Jacksonville, roughly 17% of the surface area, including more than half of the ocean frontage, is government owned, federal, state and local. Jacksonville does not have the money to effectively use the part it owns and is also studying disposal of some.

I strongly oppose it.
Franklin Thompson
5:43AM AUG 8TH 2012
You have got to be kidding.

Leave a Comment on This Story

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.