Columns

Eric Buermann: Billions Wasted and He Dares to Whine?

It’s a Zero-only Monday -- SFWMD board chairman earned it
By: Nancy Smith | Posted: February 14, 2011 3:55 AM
New Heroes and Zeroes
For the first time in years, the South Florida Water Management District has a chance to get a grip on reality, and what does it do? Whine like a spoiled brat.

Instead of cheering Gov. Rick Scott's involvement in trying to turn around the District’s failed management strategies – especially knowing they need help to fight strangulating federal regulations – board members last week resorted to attempts of scaring the pants off the 16 counties they serve and every Floridian seeking to save the Everglades.

Eric Buermann
Some of the most outlandish oh-my-the-sky-is-falling silliness came from the board chairman, Eric Buermann. If the governor curtails the water management districts’ ability to tax property owners by 25 percent – as he has proposed to do – that isn’t a break for taxpayers, says Buermann.

Why not?

Because, apparently, the $180 million it will cost the District over the next two years could create the need for unthinkable sacrifice. The chairman sat by quietly at last week's board meeting -- offered not one comforting word -- while Vice Chairman Jerry Montgomery frightened the wits out of District employees with talk of layoffs.

Buermann’s hand-wringing despair ended with the biggest absurdity of all: “We are getting down to the point where we might just as well close the agency.”

Close the agency? Wholesale layoffs? This man, the ultimate Zero, is leaving the District just in time.

The governor is not the bad guy in this bureaucratic version of a B-grade spaghetti western. When he rode into town, he didn’t rob the bank and shoot up the town, he gave the townsfolk a tax break.

When you’ve got a budget of $1.1 billion and more than 1,930 employees as the District has, you don’t get to blame the governor.

Water Management District Map

Courtesy: University of Florida

When you’re responsible for the largest budget of the state’s five water management agencies – with more than $650 million allocated to Everglades restoration – you don’t get to say that Everglades restoration is in danger because of the governor. At least, not this governor.

Buermann has my friends in Martin County all tied up in knots, and I can understand why. They’re fed up to the teeth at having helped Martin pour $43 million into Everglades restoration over the last decade but seeing nothing come of it. In the absence of the promised, completed reservoir, landowners north of Lake Okeechobee are being paid to store water, which is still getting dirtier, which is reaching the lake, which is pumped out into the Caloosahatchee and St. Lucie rivers and their estuaries.

These Martin folks – certainly fiscal conservatives and most of them supporters of Scott’s policies – want the governor and the Legislature not to cut the District’s property tax ability. That’s because they believe Buermann. They fear they will never see significant restoration for their ailing St. Lucie estuary. They’re even urging a letter-writing campaign to the governor and their legislative delegation.

Said Tom Kenny, a lifelong Martin County resident, former Martin County commissioner and member of the Water Resources Advisory Commission, "Everglades, northern and southern, restoration is critical to the health of our rivers and our economy. If District funding is cut they will have no choice but to withdraw as the local partner to restoration efforts."

Kenny is the smartest man I know on Treasure Coast water issues. I'm taking a chance here saying I think he's overstating his case.

Here’s why I disagree, why I think Scott has shown up at just the right time with the right idea.

In the first place, there’s enough money and then some in the budget for the District’s core mission – flood protection and water supply.

The District has failed. Completely and utterly. It may not be entirely their fault, but it is what it is.

A decade after the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) was signed, we have no substantial restoration from it. Costs are rising. The broad support CERP once enjoyed has fractured. And the state-federal partnership is not working.

That’s why it rings about as hollow as a heartbreak to hear District board members complain that a property tax cut would drive water managers to postpone restoration projects. How absurd.

The District has thrown away hundreds of millions of taxpayers’ dollars, especially since 2007.

“They certainly didn’t mean to,” said Barbara Miedema, vice president of the Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative and member of Scott’s transition team for water. “But they’ve participated in ‘mission creep’ and they haven’t always made the wisest of choices.”

What the governor is looking for is what she calls “a timeout.”

“The District is not getting the things done it needs to,” she said. “We want to use these two years to take a step back, take an inventory of all the projects we’ve started and stopped and all the ways we could be working more effectively and more cost-efficiently.

“We have to ask ourselves, ‘What do we need to be doing?’” Miedema said.

Gov. Charlie Crist’s deal with U.S. Sugar Corp. did more than anything to rearrange the District’s priorities and, frankly, waste money. Building concrete projects was replaced with buying land as the District’s new priority. In fact, right now the District is sitting on a land inventory of more than 100,000 acres, most of it unused.

Taxpayers had already shelled out almost $300 million of the A-1 reservoir’s $800 million price tag when Crist and the District shut down construction in 2008. Had the shut-down never happened, the reservoir would have been completed in 2010 and right now it would have been storing 62 billion gallons of water -- the equivalent of more than 5 million residential swimming pools – water that instead continues to be flushed east and west to the estuaries.

Miedema puts the District’s problems in a more kindly light than I do. I think the District is the true Florida Taj Mahal. I think it’s a monolithic, gold-plated bureaucracy dripping in strange priorities and questionable practices. Staff and board members alike travel first-class through the list of votes they recommend and cast. They think of spending millions the way most of us would spend hundreds. Some examples:

They bought something called a SAP program – razzle-dazzle, top-of-the-line accounting software – something so expensive it’s generally only used by big private companies to track consumer goods. In fact, only two public agencies in the country use it. Not only did it cost $81 million when the District bought it in 2007, it costs $10 million a year to maintain it.

 

Rick Scott

Governor Rick Scott and entourage exit the Department of Environmental Protection after last Friday's visit.| Photo Gray Rohrer

Year after fiscal year the District’s goal has been to spend – or tie up – 90 percent of their budget in the first quarter of the year. What business does that? Could you run your family's budget that way?

Their employee benefits packages are particularly lucrative at the top. I asked the District on Thursday for the value of  Executive Director Carol Wehle’s compensation, but did not receive an answer by the time of publication. Her salary alone is more than $200,000, but beyond that what sends her package into orbit are the benefits – the DROP program participation, the health care and pension and other lifetime-security tag-ons. Upper management employees with Wehle’s valuable goodies package number in the teens.

Meanwhile, out in the field, more waste.  After billions -- literally, billions -- have been spent over the years on exercises like ripping out evil-for-the-Everglades cattails, the District is spending $200,000 to repopulate said cattails in water treatment areas, where they are apparently now good for the environment.

Gabe Margasak, media relations representative for SFWMD, had little to say beyond the pat press statement that appeared in other news reports. "The District  has not yet started its budget development process for fiscal year 12, which begins in October," Margasak wrote. "The agency will be working closely with DEP and the governor’s office in the months ahead to determine the most effective way to meet the governor’s objectives."

Miedema points out that the board needs Scott’s involvement because the District and the federal government – with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Migratory Bird Act, wetlands mitigation rules and other considerations coming from Washington -- often work at cross-purposes. The result is delay, expense, frustration and lack of results. Scott, she believes, can provide the connection to help fix the broken link.

So can our congressional delegation, she says, which increasingly presses colleagues in Washington to kill the EPA’s numeric nutrient criteria for Florida waters.

“The overreaching federal government is one of our biggest problems,” she maintains. “They need to leave us alone, go home, let us police specific limits on the amounts of nutrients allowed in state waters. We understand the need for clean water in a fragile environment like ours, just as well as they do.”

Hopefully, Floridians – and especially the Legislature – will take a broader, deeper look at the District, considering that these people, responsible for so much waste for so many years, these people elected by no one, have no business crying over a rightly tightened budget. The governor is giving them a chance to do a better job for South Florida.

 

Sorry, you need to install flash to see this content.

 

Sorry, you need to install flash to see this content.

-

Reach Nancy Smith at nsmith@sunshinestatenews.com or at (850) 727-0859.

-


Comments (5)

Freedom 1
5:52PM FEB 15TH 2011
All of these water management districts have wasted our tax money over the years. The SFWMD is the worst of the worst.
Buermann is one of the worst culprits. He carried Crist's dirty political agenda for years. He also belittled the Tea Party members when we tried to stop him from wasting our taxes dollars on the US Sugar bailout. He can't be ushered out the door soon enough.
Governor Scott the Tea Party movement is counting on you.
Eric Buermann
12:18PM FEB 15TH 2011
Nancy - Your editorial has misled your readership by simply not using facts. Although most people know Sunshine News, as the arm of a Tallahassee lobbying organization, is not a legitimate “news” organization, there still should be some responsibility to use facts in your advocacy. We hope you will get in touch in the future to obtain accurate and meaningful information that will be presented to our fellow citizens.

All the best,
Eric Buermann
Chairman, Governing Board
South Florida Water Management District
Omom
5:12PM FEB 14TH 2011
Nancy Smith for President!! I can not believe someone actually has enough nerve to write such an article. You must be untouchable.
caprica1
1:15AM FEB 15TH 2011
Yes,
Nancy,"Good Egg" Smith!
It must get lonely when no reads your stuff. Do you ever write your own comments on this lobbyist rag? I swear it's your relatives responding with such useless and inane comments like the one above.
The most commented articles gernerate few responses and are from months ago. So will the Sunshine News team up with the FLCOC soon to make more of those silly anti-teacher union ads soon? I'm waiting. Your propaganda is always good for a laugh. You guys don't even have to try very hard in this state, do you?
LDouglas though, actually has insightful comments and he actually thinks about issues.
LDouglas
6:53AM FEB 14TH 2011
What the governor is looking for is what she calls “a timeout.”

“The District is not getting the things done it needs to,” she said. “We want to use these two years to take a step back, take an inventory of all the projects we’ve started and stopped and all the ways we could be working more effectively and more cost-efficiently."

Sounds prudent and reasonable. As far as this:

"The overreaching federal government is one of our biggest problems,” she maintains. “They need to leave us alone, go home, let us police specific limits on the amounts of nutrients allowed in state waters. We understand the need for clean water in a fragile environment like ours just as well as they do.”

Maybe "we" understand that now- now that the "overreaching federal government" has stepped in, but it's obvious, we didn't understand it well enough before.

Leave a Comment on This Story

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.