Politics

Federal Shutdown Averted With One-Week Band-Aid

Negotiators buy more time by trimming $39 billion in last-minute spending accord
By: Kenric Ward | Posted: April 9, 2011 12:01 AM
Open for Business
A U.S. government shutdown 2011 was averted at the last minute Friday night after the House and Senate reached a temporary spending agreement.

The measure, which will keep the government running until Thursday, postponed an impending furlough of some 800,000 federal workers.

Friday's "bridge" agreement calls for $39 billion in short-term spending cuts, and pushes off the contentious issue of abortion funding, which Republicans sought to block.

By Thursday, the House and Senate will schedule votes on a longer-term budget that will carry the government through Sept. 30, the end of the current fiscal year.

The news was greeted with a mixture of relief over a crisis averted, and frustration over continued wrangling that will spill into next week. And harsh rhetoric left its mark.

Throughout the afternoon leading up to the midnight deadline, Democrats said abortion funding was a crucial sticking point, as Republicans held fast to their demand to cut off Title 10 "women's health" programs. Roughly 25 percent of Title 10 funds go to Planned Parenthood, the nation's leading abortion provider.

One-third of Planned Parenthood's annual $1.1 billion budget comes from the taxpayers, and Democrats were equally determined to keep the money flowing. Both sides reportedly agreed to vote on the issue separately next week.

Earlier in the day, Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., called the GOP position "extremist ideology" and accused Republicans of "pouting in the corner."

Rep. Louise Slaughter, D-N.Y., was even more vitriolic.

Speaking at an abortion rally Thursday in Washington, D.C., Slaughter said, “This is probably one of the worst times we’ve seen. ... In ’94, people were elected simply to come here to kill the National Endowment for the Arts. Now they’re here to kill women.”

Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga., blasted Senate Democrats and President Barack Obama for "hypocritical games."

On Friday afternoon, Price, the House Republican Policy Committee chairman, assailed Democrats' opposition to passing a troop funding bill and agreeing to fund the government for the remainder of the fiscal year.  

Rep. Tom Rooney, R-Tequesta, said the blame for the protracted budget process lay "solely on the Democrats, who last year failed to write a budget and failed to pass one single appropriations bill."

Senate Democrats had refused to take up this week's House-passed stopgap bill that cut $12 billion in short-term spending and blocked the abortion funds.

Prior to the eleventh-hour agreement, Rep. Sandy Adams, R-Orlando, noted, "After failing to lead during the previous Congress and pass a budget, the same Democrats have once again shown that they are incapable of leading this country into anything other than astronomical debt.

"The House passed a long-term budget plan 48 days ago that would continue to fund the government at responsible budget levels, but Senate Democrats refuse to take action."

That GOP bill cut spending by $61 billion.

Earlier in the week, Democratic negotiators said they were willing to consider $38 billion in reductions over the same period -- just $1 blllion less than what was ultimately agreed to Friday night.

Either way, the figures were tiny in comparison to the budget deficit that is $1.6 trillion and growing.

Obama had complained that a budget agreement "could have gotten done three months ago."

But Republicans pointed out that Democrats previously controlled both houses of Congress and the White House, yet failed to even propose a budget for the current fiscal year.


THE ODD COUPLE: BACHMANN AND REID


Though much of the rhetoric in the final hours was as predictable as it was harsh, there were a few off-script surprises from the right.

Even as Democrats accused tea party groups of pushing House Speaker John Boehner into "extreme" positions, one congressional tea party favorite took a more moderate stance.

Comments (22)

Conrad Fitzhume
11:37AM APR 10TH 2011
One piece of the puzzle that's an easy fix (if the GOP is willing to go against their billionaire campaign supporters' greedy love of $$$) is to go back to the pre - G.W. tax rates for the wealthiest 2% of Americans. The GOP's 'fix' for our Nation's financial woes lies entirely upon the backs of those who can least afford it (the middle class). I'm sure the millionaires & billionaires would not mind doing their patriotic duty by kicking in their 'fair share'. After all, they still will be able to hide plenty of money in their offshore accounts, offshore businesses and other tax loopholes.
Jessie Sharpton
12:31PM APR 9TH 2011
Give me a break, brother Clinton did not balance the budget. Remember the dot.com craze when every IPO shot up 2,000%? Well that is what the balanced the budget on. Projections! As soon as the bubble burst we went into a recession, money stopped coming in and the deficit went up.

Also, remember that they forced Brother Bill to sign welfare reform. This also contributed to the budge. All in all I would rather have the first black president back in office than the first vacation president any day.
Penny
6:13AM APR 9TH 2011
"Abortion funding" is misleading. Planned Parenthood cannot use taxpayer money for abortions, rather the government funding that they receive goes toward contraceptives, cancer screenings, annual PAP smears, STD testing, pregnancy tests, and other reproductive health services for women and men. Republicans want to defund these services because funding these services means that it frees up private money for poor patients to use for their own abortions if they so choose. This is a backhanded way to prevent abortion that ultimately puts disadvantaged youth at risk for STDs and pregnancy by discontinuing federal subsidizing for preventative measures.
dan
12:25PM APR 9TH 2011
if they get money from me to use on other services that frees up private contributions for funding abortions to people who are stupid enough to get pregant when they did not want to. does planned parenthood provide contraceptives with my tax dollars?
Brian D
9:24AM APR 9TH 2011
It's simply a matter of reprogramming the money. If their budget calls for $100 to be split 30:30:40 between abortion, health care and staffing and we provide $30, they can say that 30 when to health care and everyone is happy. The truth is that at least some of that money when to abortions. Without those funds they would have to descope their work and reduce the amount for abortions by about $10. The long is short of it is that with federal money $10 worth of abortions were performed that WOULD NOT have been done without federal money. That means we were paying for abortions. The $100 budget is simplistic, but the math is the same.
R.S.
6:09AM APR 9TH 2011
Mr. Ward, I like your play on words for the headline. However, I prefer: "Republicans a Royal Flush, Decide to Fold".

Was watching Greta last night when she said that the Democrats were actually calling lobbyist to see if the deal was okay. Makes me wonder if that is not happening in Tallahassee when it comes to pension reform, illegal aliens, and pill mill database. Except it is the Republicans calling.

Whether it is in Tallahassee or Washington our government has become a cesspool in desperate need of a good pump out.
Kate
5:48AM APR 9TH 2011
The government is absolutely ridiculous!!! The American people are not the winners! Instead of cutting necessary programs the "all about his self" president and members of congress should take pay cuts and realize that they put us in this situation!!!! This is just one of many signs that the world is going the sh**!!! Our president is a moron.
Carolyn Small
9:10AM APR 9TH 2011
The folks making this into a budget fiasco still get paid if the government shuts down, it's hard to fathom.
Afua
8:41AM APR 9TH 2011
"Our president is a moron" as Kate mention is a subjective opinion and kate is entitled to making such a nonsensical remark. Our president is not a moron and everyone can see that because he is not playing fool to the republicans as president bush did.
Reece
11:20AM APR 9TH 2011
Well...maybe not a moron, how about "IDIOT'
American
6:34AM APR 9TH 2011
If you noticed it isn't the president holding this up...
Brian D
9:29AM APR 9TH 2011
So, two thoughts. One, the president made it certain that the original stop gap passed last week would not make it through. He threatened to veto even if the senate did pass it. And since he is the most popular president in a decade and a democrat it makes sense for the other dems to listen. Two, What kind of ridiculous notion is it to think that a republican president wouldn't work with republicans or that a democratic president wouldn't try to block republicans. It's a political game, not an improvement from Obama to Bush. Obama is doing the same thing for dems that Bush did for republicans.
justsomeguy
1:08AM APR 9TH 2011
Nervous for a minute! My FHA LOAN HASN'T GONE THRU YET!

AND

first post!!!
Shawn
1:22AM APR 9TH 2011
America needs a Welfare shutdown not a government shutdown!
American
6:39AM APR 9TH 2011
That is beyond ignorant, we already have a huge population in poverty without food or homes. While most people tend to think that people on welfare are abusing the system it is not true and many of these people work multiple jobs trying to survive while the mega-rich drive around in $100,000 cars. Shut down welfare and you'll have a hell of a lot more problems...
Tam
10:43AM APR 9TH 2011
..I'm sure there are people working very hard while on welfare. But were I live and the little towns around me,..there are, in my opinion, several people who DO abuse this help. You would be suprised on the amount of people that do drive very nice cars,..nicer than myself, or my dad who has worked his a** off @ same job for 30some years drives..and they come in with their nails done, highlights, nice clothes and pay with food stamps. This is happening and those that abuse the welfare system are the ones that are in the wrong. They are taking away from those that actually need the help. I worked in a gas station/store that accepted food stamps. Parents send their children in with the foodstamp card,..and what do they spend the money on?..snack cakes, pop, slim jims, chips..and not just $5 worth,..thesekids come in and spend $10-$30 @ a time in junk food, mean while some of those kids parents could go out and find a job but do not. I understand jobs are hard to find, and some people cannot work, and there are tons of people who do need this help,..but to the rest of the people who ARE NOT in need of welfare, or have the option to work, get off your rear-end and take care of yourself and your family.
Mango
11:59AM APR 9TH 2011
I have to disagree. As a caseworker in Welfare, Food Stamps and Medicaid .... People on Welfare (cash assistance) DO NOT work. They do not plan on working. IF they did work, they would no longer be eligible for Welfare (AFDC/TANF). The majority that receive cash benefits have NO intention of working. They get free housing compliments of taxes working people pay. They get free food stamps. Some sell their EBT debit card and password and use they money to buy drugs. Medicaid? They don't pay a cent for it ... we the taxpayers pay for medicaid. They run to the emergency room if they have an earache or some minor thing, and we pay for it. I pay out of my pocket for my food, rent, health insurance and anything else I need. Welfare should be massively reformed, as well as medicaid and food stamps. Working Americans shouldn't have to pay for bums who have NO intention of working. I am in favor of short-term assistance for people who are trying to find work, who want to work, but not for those who expect a handout from our tax money as if it is their right. Cut back on welfare, food stamps, medicaid by requiring productive work efforts and you could save tons of tax money.
Sassy
9:34AM APR 9TH 2011
I agree shuting down welfare will only put us as a whole in a worse istuation. But we could have a better system.Welfare should help people get back on their feet. The way things are now, makes it hard for people to get off of welfare. If they make more money they lose bennefits totaly in stead of just reducing them. This prevents them from making more money cause they can't get a job to compensate for welfare and beyond, unsualy not even the welfare alone.
Planned Parenthood is very needed think of the increase in babys that would most likely need welfare without this program. Planned Parenthood is cheaper than what could be.
Dan galle
7:40AM APR 9TH 2011
You're the ignorant one I get by on 17 k a year with 2 kids. Learn how to budget and quit hanging out in bars and then you can afford your own health care.
An American Citizen
2:05AM APR 9TH 2011
The government might have some money if Cheney's war hadn't sucked up a trillion dollars into Halliburton. Then the chairman of the Fed. reserve becomes the U.S. treasure and filters another trillion into banks... these people have committed treason and have left our country bankrupt. Why don't more people see it and the media report it... because of the conglomerate media. Does anybody care to elaborate or comment??...please share your thoughts.
American
6:44AM APR 9TH 2011
I agree, if we can remember Clinton did balance the budget. I find it amazing that everyone is blaming Obama for this, when firstly he isn't the only person making decisions in Washington and secondly the Bush administration got us into this mess with two wars and tax cuts for the wealthy. But of course now everyone is going to blame Obama, especially the republicans looking for a way to get someone in office. If a republican wins the next presidential election I am going to be very very scared.
Pay our military!
3:49AM APR 9TH 2011
Look at this facebook following. A lot of unhappy people.
http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=208173649210797