SSN on Facebook
SSN on Twitter
SSN on YouTube
RSS Feed


Florida Delegation Breaks on Party Lines over Hobby Lobby Ruling

June 29, 2014 - 6:00pm
The Florida congressional delegation broke on party lines over the U.S. Supreme Courts decision in Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby which ensured that Hobby Lobby and other closely held businesses do not have to comply with President Barack Obamas health-care laws contraception mandate due to religious objections.

The Supreme Court ruled in Hobby Lobbys favor on a 5-4 decision with Justice Anthony Kennedy joining the conservatives on the court -- Chief Justice John Roberts, Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito -- in ruling with the majority.

U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., a potential Republican presidential candidate in 2016, praised the decision on Monday as a victory for religious freedom and a blow against Obamas law.

A key part of the American dream has always been the ability of our people to freely practice their faiths without government interference, Rubio said on Monday. Obamacares mandates have threatened to change this and, in doing so, erode the American dream as we know it and our peoples ability to live it. The Supreme Court has correctly recognized that Obamacares trampling of religious liberty in the Hobby Lobby case should not stand.

Obamacare was written and passed with a clear disregard for the reality that millions of Americans are inspired by their faiths in all aspects of their lives, including the way entrepreneurs manage their businesses, Rubio added. In America, no one should be forced to violate their religious beliefs if they wish to run a business.

The Supreme Courts Hobby Lobby decision is a re-affirmation of Americas commitment to religious freedom and a reminder of why Obamacare is such a flawed law that needs to be entirely repealed and replaced, Rubio concluded.

U.S. Rep. Dennis Ross, R-Fla., also cheered the ruling as a win for religious freedom and joined Rubio in calling for a repeal of Obamas health-care law.

"The president's health-care law goes beyond overreaching, Ross said on Monday. The Supreme Court has ruled today that the agency tasked with implementing Obamacare can't coerce family-owned businesses to violate core tenets of their religious faith. It's a shame that the First Amendment's protections for freedom of religion needed to be validated by the Supreme Court. Today's decision was a victory for religious freedom and another example of why Obamacare must be replaced."

U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), said the decision would hurt women.

I am disappointed and deeply concerned by the Supreme Courts decision today in the case of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, Wasserman Schultz said on Monday after the 5-4 decision was announced. Thanks to the Affordable Care Act, millions of Americans have gained access to preventive services without out-of-pocket costs, including birth control. However, this decision takes money out of the pockets of women and their families and allows for-profit employers to deny access to certain health care benefits based on their personal beliefs. Nearly 60 percent of women who use birth control do so for more than just family planning.

Wasserman Schultz stressed the partisan divide over the matter.

It is no surprise that Republicans have sided against women on this issue as they have consistently opposed a womans right to make her own health care decisions, Wasserman Schultz said. Republicans have also blocked the Paycheck Fairness Act, which would bring us closer to the promise of equal pay for women. In the wake of this dangerous precedent set by the Supreme Court, Democrats in Congress will continue to fight on the issues of importance to women and their families.

U.S. Rep. Lois Frankel, D-Fla., also denounced the ruling as bad for women.

Employers belong in the workplace, not in an employees doctor's office, said Frankel. Personal decisions about contraception should be between a woman and her physician not a woman and her supervisor. Todays ruling is a sad step backward for womens health and individual rights over those of corporate bosses.

Frankel stressed that the ruling did not impact other matters including benefits for same-sex spouses or mental health coverage.

Reach Kevin Derby at

Comments are now closed.


Opinion Poll

Do you think describing terrorists as "radical Islamists" and "Islamic jihadists" is unfair to Muslims living peacefully in America?
Older pollsResults


Rubio-Cruz battle escalates
Tampa Bay Times