Business

Florida Seniors Queasy Over Obamanomics

Democrats' health-care, tax policies deal double blow to retirees, report says
By: Kenric Ward | Posted: September 16, 2010 4:05 AM
Sick Senior CitizenWhen Medical Advantage reforms take effect, they will restrict senior citizens and the disabled to fewer and worse health care choices, Heritage analysts say.
If Congress fails to extend Bush-era tax cuts this year, Florida retirees will suffer a blow to their wallets -- adding to their health-care pains, a Heritage Foundation report says.

The conservative Washington, D.C.-based think tank forecasts that:

  • Scheduled tax hikes on capital gains taking effect Jan. 1 will hurt 57 percent of Florida seniors, who rely on retirement savings accounts for their fixed income.
  • Nearly tripling the top dividend tax rate will depress the value of stocks in several industry sectors by more than $211 billion, serving as a double whammy to seniors who will receive fewer dividends that are taxed at a higher rate.
  • Already-enacted federal health-care legislation will force some 543,963 Florida seniors out of health plans in Medicare Advantage (which currently makes up about one-fourth of the Medicare program).


When the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s Medicare Advantage reforms take effect, they will restrict senior citizens and the disabled to fewer and worse health care choices, reducing their access to quality health care, Heritage analysts say.

"The PPACA will force an estimated 7.4 million people (50 percent of enrollees) out of health plans they would have chosen under prior law and into the fee-for-service program," the report states.

What's more, transferring beneficiaries to a fee-for-service program will also have the secondary effect of increasing Medicaid and Medicare Part D spending by almost $2.5 billion in 2017, the report projected.

"Medicare beneficiaries who would have enrolled in the Medicare Advantage program under prior law will lose an average of $3,714 in 2017 health care services," according to the report, "disproportionately harming low-income and minority beneficiaries, increasing state and federal Medicaid costs, and increasing spending on prescription drugs."

The health-care law, which is being challenged by Florida and 20 other states, also has taken hits from the Florida Medical Association, which envisioned ill-effects for the state's senior population.

"The FMA opposed the passage of the federal health care legislation because we felt that Congress could have passed a better bill that would have fixed the Medicare program, provided more options for seniors, and protected the relationship between physicians and their patients," said FMA Executive Vice President Tim Stapleton.


Comments (3)

LDouglas
8:17AM SEP 18TH 2010
What are you saying Level Head? That's it's good for taxpayers to spend an extra 14% on health care because it provides dividends to investors? That doesn't seem right...

Otherwise, shopping with a relative yesterday reminded me of another thing we could do to reduce our health care tab. Put a stoplight symbol on the front of the package of processed food.

The stoplight should be for salt, sugar, unhealthy fats, and known carcinogens. (Green is eat to your heart's content, yellow is eat with caution, and red is stop and think before consuming this food.)

Our food choices very much translate to a lot of ill health. I think a stoplight symbol would help people make better food choices based on whatever health condition they're prone to or being treated for.
Level Head
6:24PM SEP 17TH 2010
Kendric Ward's opinion is making Florida Queasy. Hidden in the above article "Medicare Advantage is actually a private insurance company run by Medicare and it is very wasteful, with more than 14 percent of costs going to profit," Quinnell said. "Cutting the Advantage program will actually allow for more money spent in Medicare to go directly to care for seniors, and the money spent will be more efficiently spent and not go to private profits."
While some companies might cut dividends as a result of the tax hike, many dividend payers would keep following a strategy of regularly raising distributions, provided that these companies can generate enough in free cash flow. Most dividend growth investors would not be affected by much, particularly since most have increased distributions for over 10 and 25 years, which was before the Bush tax cuts were initiated.
LDouglas
9:04PM SEP 16TH 2010
"Though their diagnoses differ, Quinnell and Heritage do agree on one thing: The current system of paying for health care needs improvement."

It needs more than that or we'll never be able to afford health care- especially health care for all. The delivery system has to improve too. Comparative effectiveness is one way to achieve it, as is more urgent care facilities to cut down on emergency room visits for non life threatening medical emergencies.

We also need to crack down on fraud perpetrated by pharmaceutical companies and medical device manufacturers.

We also need to stop subsidizing our ill health (like subsidizing corn and sugar) and crack down on pollutants in our air, water, and food. (It's a lot cheaper- and more ethical/moral to prevent disease than it is to treat it.)