Politics
Florida TaxWatch Report: Amendment 4 Would Gut State’s Economy
Around the State
Florida TaxWatch issued a scathing report Thursday on the negative impact Amendment 4 would have on the state’s economy and insisting "it should not be in Florida's Constitution."
If passed, the report states, Amendment 4 could cost Florida 260,000 jobs per year, $16.7 billion in personal income, $21.6 billion in gross state product and $2.2 billion in state tax revenue. It would also mean the loss of $227 million in property tax revenue, or roughly $3.4 million per county -- although the effects of the amendment would feel greater in areas that rely on development for growth.
“This analysis shows that Florida simply cannot afford Amendment 4 and it should not be in Florida’s Constitution,” said Florida TaxWatch President and CEO Dominic Calabro.
Amendment 4 has been pushed in recent years by Hometown Democracy, which seeks to give voters a greater say in land-use changes sought by developers in order build their projects. The amendment would put every land-use change on the ballot for the voters to decide. Currently, such decisions are typically made by local governments.
Opponents say the amendment would push developers -- one of the main sources of Florida’s economic growth in recent years -- out of the state at a time when the economy needs them most.
The cumbersome task of putting every single land-use change up for a general election is also likely to prove costly. The report estimates that special elections held across the state could cost between $44.6 million and $83.4 million annually. Although the land-use changes could be put on the ballot for the next election, that would cause further delays to an already lengthy process.
All of these added costs would mean the state and local governments would likely raises taxes in order to pay for them.
Hometown Democracy, however, disputed the report and denounced Florida TaxWatch, which describes itself as a nonpartisan organization, as a player in the effort to defeat Amendment 4.
“Florida TaxWatch is far from an independent broker in this campaign. TaxWatch is an arm of Florida's retail industry and, as such, is practically part of the 'No on 4' effort,” the group said in a released statement on its website.
In fact, far from hurting Florida’s economy, Hometown Democracy is convinced Amendment 4 will help foster sober, steady growth.
“Amendment 4 would end the boom-and-bust cycle of Florida real estate speculation and provide a more stable economic platform, resulting in more investment in our state, not less,” the statement reads in part.
Dr. Rick Harper, director of the Haas Center for Business Research and Economic Development, which contributed to the report, said Hometown Democracy is ignoring the likely residual effects of the amendment. For instance, because urban voters are not likely to approve of developments near them, they will be pushed to more rural areas, thus contributing to urban sprawl -- one of the very things Amendment 4 supporters hope it will combat.
“In my estimation, Amendment 4 is going to have these unintended consequences that supporters of the amendment don’t want to see,” Dr. Harper said.
The report came out the same day as former Gov. Jeb Bush announced his opposition to Amendment 4 in the form of a commentary in the Tampa Tribune.
“It has the potential to completely stall our economy, making it harder to create and grow jobs and to responsibly manage the growth of our beautiful state,” Bush stated.
A Mason-Dixon poll released earlier this month showed 44 percent of voters supported the amendment, down from 53 percent in September.
Reach Gray Rohrer at grohrer@sunshinestatenews.com or at (850) 727-0859.

Comments (5)
I respect my fellow Floridians intelligence so I won't tell anybody how to vote. I will tell you to look at both sides, give it consideration and then choose for yourself. But please keep in mind that if it hadn't been for the Save our Homes Amendment, and the Class size Amendment, our politicians would have had no reason to address those issues. (15 years later we're still waiting for them to "fix" the rising property taxes- how many of us would have been taxed out of our homes by now if we had waited?) Anyway, I don't see it being any different without passing Amendment 4. The main reason, I'm voting YES.
As for being opposed because you think we need developers more than ever, that's ridiculous. We don't need more of the same. Build more houses so we can bring more people to Florida who need more jobs. When does it end? When it totally collapses? Or just til you've made enough to get out?
And the scare tactic of our property taxes going up doesn't work either. If true under Amendment 4, it's just as true without it. IMO, it's better to pay extra for quality of life then it is to pay extra for more lanes on the roads, more schools, jails, bridges, desalination plants, more power plants (which are very expensive and which current customers pay to build them for new customers), etc.
Not only that, if my county commissioners are going to give my tax money to lure a business that may be competition for my business, or degrade my neighborhood, or bring in an influx of cheap labor, I think I deserve a "real" say on it.