Government
Fraud Case Fallout Taints Tax Specialist, Department of Revenue
Around the State
A tax specialist at the Florida Department of Revenue is under internal investigation stemming from her 2004 conviction for "defrauding and obtaining money by means of false and fraudulent pretenses."
Deon McCrimmon was convicted in U.S. District Court in Georgia of concealing a $139,169 unpaid IRS bill and overstating her income when she applied for a home loan in Albany, Ga.
Less than seven months later, and while still on probation, McCrimmon landed a job at the Florida Department of Revenue on April 8, 2005.
DOR declined to discuss McCrimmon's case or her status. Spokeswoman Renee Watters said the matter was under investigation by the department's inspector general.
The inspector general's office confirmed that the McCrimmon case was "open," but would not elaborate.
McCrimmon did not return Sunshine State News' call seeking comment.
Court records show that McCrimmon was a bank examiner at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. in Georgia during the time of her illicit activities. A source said she was terminated by FDIC upon her conviction.
How McCrimmon, a convicted felon, navigated through the hiring process and standard background checks at the Department of Revenue is unclear. But a source close to the situation, speaking on condition of anonymity, suggested that McCrimmon "may have schemed with another Revenue employee and friend to circumvent the hiring and interviewing process by getting the interviewing team to forgo and not perform the task of due diligence to its fullest."
The federal indictment stated that McCrimmon "knowingly and willfully devised a scheme and artifice" to defraud Homecomings Financial Network Inc. when she applied for a $211,000 home loan.
McCrimmon, the indictment said, "falsely stated on a Uniform Residential Loan Application that she had liabilities in the total amount of $76,976. In truth and fact, as she well knew at the time, defendant McCrimmon had liabilities in the total amount of at least $186,976," including a $139,169 unpaid IRS bill.
The indictment also said McCrimmon "fraudulently represented" her monthly income as $10,000. It was actually $5,685.
"The defendant knew that her real income would not qualify her for the loan she sought from Homecomings Financial," Assistant U.S. Attorney Jim Crane wrote in the June 25, 2004, indictment.
Pleading guilty, McCrimmon was ordered to pay $24,775 in restitution to Homecomings and was placed on five years' probation.
Today, McCrimmon earns $43,701 a year at the Department of Revenue -- barely two-thirds what she made at FDIC.
It is not known if McCrimmon made all the court-ordered restitution payments or fulfilled the terms of her probation.
But the source who blew the whistle on McCrimmon in a letter to DOR Executive Director Lisa Vickers blasted both the tax specialist and the agency that employs her:
"For almost a decade, this convicted criminal has lived a lie, while being promoted time and time again to better and higher-paying jobs of trust and leadership, all the time betraying the trust of the citizens, taxpayers and voters of the state of Florida."
In a separate but potentially related development, state Sen. Paula Dockery, R-Lakeland, announced Friday that she has re-filed legislation to bolster the independence of inspector general offices.
Under SB 270, the state's chief inspector general would appoint agency inspectors, and agency directors would be barred from firing agency inspectors general.
The chief inspector general would report to the Cabinet, instead of solely to the governor.
Contact Kenric Ward at kward@sunshinestatenews.com or at (772) 801-5341.


Comments (100)
Tallahassee "process owners" force the field offices to implement their stupid ideas and then when they inevitably fall apart scapegoat and fire the local managers. In the field managers are fired and disposed of like used drinking cups. Yet I Tallahassee you can apparently have a criminal record, sleep on the job, not show up for work, and give jobs to unqualified friends as long as you are in the right clique.
My advice, don't focus on Deon M. Focus on management.
In our opinion you could have walked out with no record , no probation, no wrecked employment history, still have been making $60,000 a year or more now. Like we said at the beginning something just isn't right why you would have plead "GUILTY TO WIRE FRAUD"
Deon, your Peers and maybe the IG's Office (No we take that back) they're an iept bunch of morons still trying to find out for you who busted you on the wire fraud charge, so you can keep your job, REMEMBER YOUR PEERS, ALL THE STATE REPS, STATE SENATORS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE AND A WHOLE LOT OF TAXPAYERS, BUSINESSOWNERS AND VOTERS WANT TO KNOW
The Public Information files are::
The Criminal Indictment United States of America vs Deon McCrimmon
The Criminal Judgement United States of America vs Deon McCrimmon
Email to Executive Director Lisa Vicker
Email to members of the Florida Senate
Unless you have been living under a rock or are a total moron, you have figured out TWB is a group effort and I mean a big group effort.
Lots of input, opinions and comments before we ever post a comment. And thanks to Go to Meeting we share live almost everything we do here. The son of one of us is one of them there "Shyster Lawyer" types "Shyster must pay good, he drives a car that cost more than my first house, and his wife's is even bigger". Back to our story, while we were Mickey Mouse'ing , he was reviewing all of the comments for anything that was deflamatory, or those other things. When he got to Venom's, comments he started laughing "This person has been watching way to much TV. " his words not ours. At the end of his review, "Tell Mr. Venom to let the lawyers do their job and he to do his, he doesn't know what he is talking about, Florida has a "AntiSlapp law to stop just such aggregation lawsuits from being filed, it is no longer open season on "Free Speech" , a plaintiff has to strongly prove their case and it gets very hard when the plaintiff is a public official as everyone in the comments is without a doubt and if they lose or the case gets thrown out of court even before a trial the plaintiff must the pay the defendants lawyer and court cost and the defendant can counter sue for damages. Any plaintiff especially if they are a public official is therefore well advised to consider if there is any profit in pursuing a case. Sorry Venom ya been busted..
John, we hate to embarrass you like this but , you opened yourself up
to ridicule . We direct you to our post of 8:52AM SEP 23
and 8:28AM SEP 23 . John none of us work for DOR, now. And the one
that did left while DOR still had a great Executive Director named Jim Zingale, my friend and I never proached the entrance way of a DOR building. Sorry for the takedown, but you went of halfcocked and payed the price for your ignorance and stupidy.
We have reviewed your current application for employment.
We assume it is a contiuation of your orginial application, is that
correct ?
If so, we can find no untrue statements at this time. You did clearly state and attest that you had been arrested for and plead guilty to the crime of "Wire Fraud" , under the section heading "Background Information".
We did however find two areas of concern, of which we as employers picked up on immediately and we are not Professional Interviewers. The statement to the question noted as "Reason for Leaving" item #8 concerning your employment from 05/1992 to 06/2004 with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) we consider this statement vague, incomplete , and elusive at best or put another way we consider it to be "SPIN", we believe a Professional Interviewing Company would have picked up on this and required you to submit a written statement from the FDIC to determine exactly why you left their employment.
Since you were interviewed by inept interviews who may not have had any formal training in the interviewing process and in order to vindicate yourself in the eyes of your peers would you be willing to submit to this newspaper a notarized form to submit to the FDIC for release of your personnel records to them.. Please understand this is not a court of law , but the court of public opinion and a refusal to provide information to prove innocent or guilty is not viewed in a favorable light in our opinion.
<< http://bit.ly/15o8oa >> Get'er Done Folks , you are true patriots
reply
plea of guilt to the crime of "Wire Fraud" , please provide your
peers with answers to the below questions to better support your position.
From Spencer who we assume knows you quite well and we
quote "As some one who is close to and knows this lady for
over 20 years" and "whats not stated in this article is that
teh IRS was paid 75.000 out of her own pocket and the
otehr agreed upon 150.000 was paid off by her dad." ,
that amounts to $225,000, correct ?? and "So now don't look
like she owes uncle Sam a thing".
Our questions are , Why did you plead guilty, surely you
and your family are or were financial well off at the time
($225,000) and could afford competent legal counsel.
It appears from the many comments defending your character
that you were a pillar of the community and longtime member
of a church and loved by your friends and family, very strong
items a lawyer would bring up in court in your defense.
Also this would have been your first offense correct ?
Another strong item in your favor, an outstanding employee
of good standing, employed for (How many years with FDIC ?)
All the FBI and US Attorney had was a fax with your name on
it correct ? Deon, a first year law student could have gotten this reduced to nothing or even thrown out of court in our opinion.
Why did you plead guilty, Deon instead of face a jury of your
peers ?? Some thing just doesn't add up here in our opinion.
Bear with us one more minute and answer this question also,
"When was the lien filed by the US District Court for the Middle
District of Georgia in Macon, Ga, in Gadsden County , Fl. in
the amount of $ 24,775.00 paid off, or is this also one of those unfortunate oversights by you ?
We are doing what the the IG's Office should have done years ago, and what management should do now. Two of us never worked for the Department of Revenue , one never for the State of Florida and one retired when Dr. Zingale came on board. Need we say more, I think not. We were asked to look into this by a terminated individual, an much to our surprise and with less than 4 total hours of online work and numerous telephone calls we had all the available public information that we have made available for viewing and download. We ask for comments to support all views so a fair and honest picture can be discerned of this criminal (not our opinion but a confirmed fact)
It's that her story and she is sticking to it that she signed papers without reading...yea, right. This lady was a bank examiner so does that means she did not review client's files before signing off on them. FDIC better review their files.
http://bit.ly/qGHrl2
Good job explaining your side!
Leave a Comment on This Story