Columns
Higher Education Task Force Shouldn't Focus Only on Money
Around the State

Despite what some claim, there is a lot more to education than money.
Liberals measure progress by how much money is spent. That's like saying the auto that burns the most gasoline is the best bargain.
Another diversion would be to buy into the idea that education must be separated from politics.
Can’t be done. Shouldn’t be done, despite the fact that politicians sometimes are part of the problem.
One thing that affects higher education dramatically is the raw product – graduates of the K-12 system.
Reforms since 1998 have been producing results, but there are still far too many students not ready for college.
One reason is that, for decades, politicians periodically have seized on the latest education fad, given it a catchy acronym and imposed it on the system. The Blob pretends to embrace each one, after having opposed it unsuccessfully, then – after the legislator is out of office – forgets it. That's wheel-spinning. However, allowing The Blob to govern itself would be even worse than having politicians in charge.
Tuition is a thorny issue. This year the Legislature voted to allow universities to raise tuition. Scott vetoed the measure, saying he didn’t want students going deeper in debt.
Students are not paying the cost of their education, although it is an investment in their future.
On the other hand, increasing tuition is like increasing taxes, which merely produces increased spending.
All universities want to offer everything and become major research centers where teachers don't teach; they do research. When a chancellor once suggested a tiered system with more specialization, he was roundly castigated.
But the tuition increase might have allowed a second state university to attain research institution status from the American Association of Universities, which would have been a plus.
That leaves the issue of the new university just added to the system. Who knows whether it was needed or it was just a legislator’s pet project? It should have been left for the task force to address.
To hear the media tell it, the system is on the verge of collapse.
But John Delaney, University of North Florida president and a former interim chancellor and member of the task force, says that the United States has the best universities in the world, and he thinks Florida is among the best in the nation, despite cutbacks and being well below the average in spending per student.
He says students once paid only 20 percent of the cost of their schooling and that the current 50 percent share probably is fair.
He thinks it would be helpful to devise good benchmarks to measure the system's performance, and based on his own research, he believes the state could double its current spending and recover most of the cost from new revenues it would generate -- certainly a claim worth investigating.
Lloyd Brown was in the newspaper business nearly 50 years, beginning as a copy boy and retiring as editorial page editor of the Florida Times-Union in Jacksonville. After retirement he served as speech writer for Florida Gov. Jeb Bush.

Comments (5)
Are you really naive enough to believe that the Florida university system rates in the top university systems of the world, or even the nation, especially when recent cuts are forcing state universities like FAU to cut back campuses, and even UF contemplated cutting its well respected computer science program?
Money isn't everything, but it's money that helps make top U.S. universities into the dynamo's they are today.
But then some Republicans never like facts, reality or science.
Just take the issue of climate change which our Governor so dismisses because of the science he doesn't understand. Just like Republicans in Texas and Louisiana who introduced education standards that require educators to teach climate change denial as a valid scientific position. Just like Republicans in South Dakota and Utah who recently passed resolutions denying climate change, and just like Republicans in Tennessee and Oklahoma who introduced legislation to require classrooms are availlable to climate change deniers.
Don't like the science, then politically undercut by requiring pseudo-science like creationism, intellictual design, or climate change denial.
Yes, keep Lloyd Brown, for like Pat Buchanan, Nancy Smith, Thomas Sowell and Michael Barone, he'll provide easy fodder to refute.
Clearly, he isn't a William F. Buckley.
Not everyone needs a college education there are many career that could be addressed with certificate, short term programs but there are no Pell Grants available for those programs.
We need to start looking at better education on the basics, writing a simple memo, reading instructions, and basic math. Those things should be taught in K-12 but are not.
We keep throwing money at the problem and it is only getting worse. Money is not working preparing students for work. We are so caught up in politically correct and not hurting feelings of young students that they are not ready for work or further education. Most Post-Secondary schools have to teach the basics and so the quality of college graduates has necessarily dropped.
Somehow we have to address the problems of not teaching the young student the work ethic. The better schools have parents that are very engaged in making sure homework is done, tests are passed etc.. It becomes up to the schools to ensure that all schools are engaged in these simple important elements of education but the fear of being sued or fired for enforcing those important issues has backfired. Things like zero tolerance, what the kids eat, and other things that are the job of the family are taking valuable teaching time.
When it comes to college, no aid should be given to any student to go to college until that student makes an educational down-payment. That down payment is earning 30 credits with a 2.75 GPA (equivalent to the first year). Then they can apply for college loans, or private grants from corporations in exchange for employment commitments, etc. once they have proven themselves worthy. No one else should have to pay for anyone's college. It is an investment the principles should make in themselves.
My point is all colleges should be tuition based. If the college cannot make a profit and sustain itself it should make market decisions and live or die on those decision. If the school is running in the red, it needs to make pricing decisions. If they raise the price they will lose students if they lower the price they will gain students. If a school requires let's say Accounting 101 and 102 for all students, how much does the cost go up if the class goes from 12 to 20 students or to 30 students? The people put in charge of these types of market decisions are incapable of rational thought after years of dependency OPM. Colleges should be run by CEOs not PhDs.
Until market forces are put into every facet of government services the people will only be ripped off.
Tell you what - show me one state or national level politician (gathering over 30% of a vote) who isn't a libertarian and is willing to put themselves on the line to endorse this specific proposition, and I'll show you a sure political loser.
In your model, only the rich can afford to get educated. What a waste of minds. Dumbing down America.
Get real, and get educated!
Leave a Comment on This Story