Columns
New Energy Opportunities for Florida’s Future
Around the State

David Mica
Floridians consume about 27 million gallons of gasoline and diesel each and every day and generate more than 50 percent of electricity from natural gas. In addition to the day-to-day consumption to air-conditioning our homes and businesses and to drive to work or the grocery stores, Florida’s two largest industries -- tourism and agriculture -- are almost completely reliant on energy supplies.
Global energy demand is projected to increase 45 percent by 2035, so we all have a vested interest in our energy future. With the right policy choices, the oil and natural gas industry is prepared to drive the economy in the right direction with energy security, additional jobs, and increased government revenues.
Technology advances have re-established the United States as an energy-rich nation. In fact, American and Canadian oil supplies, coupled with increased biofuels development, could provide 100 percent of U.S. liquid fuel needs within 15 years.

Gas pipeline | Credit: Denys Prykhodov, Shutterstock
Many of these same technologies have also revitalized oil field production in South and Northeast Florida, and opportunities exist to expand production to more of Florida’s energy resources. For example, Destin Dome is an area about 30 miles south of Pensacola that exploration has confirmed to hold about 3 trillion cubic feet of natural gas – enough gas to power Tallahassee for over 130 years.
Yet, state and federal policies have placed this resource and others in the eastern Gulf of Mexico and in state waters off-limits. Additional opportunities, such as the construction of a terminal in Walnut Hill, Fla., that will temporarily store oil produced in the Bakken formation for delivery to Gulf refineries via pipeline, provide opportunities for Florida to participate in domestic energy growth. A few weeks ago, more than 800 people lined up for new, high-paying jobs at the terminal in this small, Northwest Florida town.
New oil and natural gas production is providing more benefits than just energy security for the states. While Florida and most other states have struggled with budget shortfalls and double-digit unemployment, North Dakota’s 3 percent unemployment and bulging government surpluses over the past four years were directly attributable to oil company activity in the state.
Similarly, Pennsylvania has benefited from 177,000 jobs over the past two years resulting from natural gas development. The benefits extend beyond state boundaries, as well. In fact, the oil and natural gas industry pays $86 million per day in federal revenues, or about $31 billion a year, in rents, royalties, bonuses and corporate taxes. On top of these payments, the industry directly contributed an estimated $470 billion to the U.S. economy in spending, wages and dividends -- an economic stimulus that occurs every year without an act of Congress.
Floridians have a vested interest in policies promoting energy security, job growth, and increased government revenues. It is time we use our voice to change state and national energy policies to increase domestic oil and natural gas supplies starting right here in Florida.
America needs leadership to bring long-term energy supply and stability to the marketplace, and Floridians can participate in electing this leadership. We have created Vote4Energy.org to help citizens learn the energy policies necessary for a robust economic recovery. We encourage you to take the time to explore the website and to Vote For Energy.
David Mica is the Executive Director of the Florida Petroleum Council.



Comments (5)
Mr. Mica,
The right policy choices have to include either more restrictions or regulations. Most of the fracking taking place not only uses large amounts of water, it pollutes large amounts and also leaves too much unrecoverable. (In case you haven't noticed, already some water poor areas the choice is between farming and fracking. In Texas, they're drinking their cleaned up sewer water in order to have water for fracking. Among other instances. But in any case, not a good thing in a country where the demand for water and food continues to grow along with the population.)
We simply can't afford to create temporary jobs no matter how good, or "save" a few dollars on a finite energy resource, if it means making water, another finite resource (even more important and valuable to our long term economic prospects as well as our very life) unusable or more expensive.
*Keep in mind too that powerplants will surpass in water use what agriculture uses in the very near future. Perhaps another reason to look beyond burning fossil fuels as part of our energy plan.
Also, regulations will have to include that we don't export our gas and oil or other than the temporary jobs and the temporary extra spending money going to the government, it won't make that much of a difference to the rest of us.
To sum it up, if I have to choose between voting for clean abundant water for now and for generations to come or vote4energy, short term prosperity because the industry won't accept any regulations to protect our water supply, my vote will be 4 WATER!
The oil and natural gas industry works closely with local, state, and federal agencies to develop environmental and water use regulations that are appropriate for the conditions in each region where hydraulic fracturing is conducted. Drilling companies work with local water planning agencies and the public to ensure local community water needs are not disrupted. The choice of water supply depends upon volume and water quality requirements, regulatory and physical availability, competing uses, and characteristics of the formation to be fractured (including water quality and compatibility considerations). If possible, wastewater from other industrial facilities or recycled fracking water is used. Otherwise, ground and surface water sources are used with the priority given to non-potable sources of water such as treated wastewater from municipal treatment centers.
The U.S. Department of Energy report "Modern Shale Gas" addresses the volume of water used for hydraulic fracturing: "To put shale gas water use in perspective, the consumptive use of fresh water for electrical generation in the Susquehanna River Basin alone is nearly 150 million gallons per day, while the projected total demand for peak Marcellus Shale activity in the same area is 8.4 million gallons per day."
The oil and natural gas industry currently supplies 62 percent of energy consumed in the U.S. (a higher percentage in Florida). The U.S. Department of Energy projects that Americans will continue to derive 57 percent of its energy from oil and natural gas in 2035. The jobs in this industry obviously are not temporary, and with continued cooperation between government officials and industry, clean water and affordable, domestically-produced energy do not have to be mutually exclusive.
We in the industry also care about the stewardship of water and its appropriate protection and use!
Otherwise, I don't doubt the amount of water a powerplant uses but the number for fracking seems way off. I've read in Pennsylavania alone drillers are permitted to withdraw 98 million gallons a day and that's just a portion of the Marcellus Shale area.
(I've also read an average well uses 7.8 million gallons of water, about a fifth of which returns to the surface and requires disposal.)
Leave a Comment on This Story