Business

Petroleum Economist: U.S. Must Move Faster on Existing Resources

By: Jim Turner | Posted: August 11, 2012 3:55 AM
John Felmy

API Chief Economist John Felmy | Credit: EnergyTomorrow - Flickr

On the eve of Agriculture Commissioner Adam Putnam’s Energy Summit in Orlando, the chief economist for the American Petroleum Industry says the need remains for the U.S. to realistically explore all its energy options without hindering the resources now in use.

API Chief Economist John Felmy, in a conference call with reporters on Friday, said the nation needs to both move forward in exploring alternative options, but at the same time meet the existing needs by considering opening resource abundant areas in the Mid and South Atlantic and the Arctic.

“We need to focus on what we should do to help consumers and focus on remembering that while a lot of the discussion is focused on green technologies, and so on, we still have 250 million cars on the road in this country that run on petroleum for the foreseeable future,” Felmy said.

“Yes we’re going to need new technologies, but we’re going to need oil and gas for the foreseeable future.”

The conference call comes as API has ramped up its pressure on the Obama administration to pursue a promised “all-of the-above' energy strategy.”  

API has also urged the president to act on a letter from seven Republican governors comprising the Outer Continental Shelf Governors' Coalition -- Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, Alaska Gov. Sean Parnell, South Carolina Gov. Nikki R. Haley, Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley, Virginia Gov. Robert F. McDonnell, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant -- that seeks advancing talks to expand exploration for oil and gas in the Outer Continental Shelf.

President Obama has continued to block drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska, believing the government should play a role in promoting clean energy technologies that wean Americans off fossil fuels, and remaining undecided -- pending an expected U.S. State Department 2013 study -- on the future of the Keystone XL Pipeline, which is proposed to carry oil from Canada’s tar sands to the Gulf Coast.

As a counter, the Mitt Romney campaign has professed that the presumptive GOP presidential nominee would approve the Keystone pipeline on “day one” in office, support an expansion of domestic oil production in ANWR, and almost certainly remove support for the billions of dollars set aside for alternative energy, allowing the free market to determine which types of technologies succeed and fail.

“We have a vast amount of oil and gas in this country basically we’re sitting on, we’re not moving forward as fast as we could,” Felmy said. “You got the East Coast, West Coast, Eastern Gulf off limits, Alaska. If you were to open those areas you’d generate immediate revenue for the governor in terms of bonuses and bids on leases, jobs and more revenue, and energy security.”

“I know a lot gets into this debate over time, well it takes a lot of time. Yes it does, but the sooner you get at it, the faster. A quote from Confucius is ‘The best time to have planted a tree was 10 years ago.’  Well, it’s true about energy policy as well.”

The quote, most often listed as a Chinese proverb, is more often noted as “The best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago. The second best time is now.”

The latest call by API comes as both food and fuel prices have increased in the U.S.

Gas prices in Florida and across the U.S. were expected to remain steady as August comes to a close, with speculation for crude falling after European stimulus measures weren’t made, Iran's threats to disrupt supply didn't occur, and economic news remained lackluster. But instead, the prices continue to spike after the U.S. Labor Department announced the addition of 163,000 new jobs in July, and Tropical Storm Ernesto generated concern in the Gulf.

Florida’s energy summit, Aug. 15-17 at the Rosen Shingle Creek Resort in Orlando, is expected to feature research underway at Florida’s universities along with speakers offering short-term and long-term outlooks for the state’s energy industry, along with how the state’s supply and demand of electrical fuels and technologies has changed over the past decade.

Some criticisms have been tossed that while renewable and alternative powers include biomass and solar energy, little focus has been given to the more affordable coal and natural gas.  

The U.S. Energy Information Administration has reported that 2011 electricity prices in Florida were around 20 percent higher than in neighboring Southern states.



Reach Jim Turner at jturner@sunshinestatenews.com or at (772) 215-9889.




Comments (7)

wbp
7:48PM AUG 12TH 2012
drill now baby, we need to get it out of the ground and sell it before alternate sources of energy catch up.
Frank
10:11PM AUG 12TH 2012
Hmmm . . . . don't you mean "UNTIL"?

And would you drill in the eastern Gulf along the pennisula where there is likely no significant oil, in National Wildlife Refuges, in the Everglades, along our beaches?
LDouglas
8:37PM AUG 13TH 2012
I think wpb was being sarcastic...
LDouglas
3:00PM AUG 11TH 2012
“We have a vast amount of oil and gas in this country basically we’re sitting on, we’re not moving forward as fast as we could,” Felmy said.

Is that a wise energy policy seeing how oil is a finite resource and we don't have enough viable alternatives? And that every time we turn around the estimates for how much oil and gas we have gets lowered? And taking in all the other considerations? Like oil still being sold on a world market. Which more supply from the U.S. doesn't help us at the pump, and if it did, it would only make us burn through it faster. Or the most important consideration- water. The amount we're using or the amount we're spoiling to drill for it, as well as the chances we're taking spoiling renewable sources of food when we drill offshore.

Which leads me to this statement in the article: "The latest call by API comes as both food and fuel prices have increased in the U.S."

Well food prices are mostly rising due to a shortage of water, you know, that other finite resource even more important to our economy and life than oil, along with ever increasing demand. It's not going to help by increasing oil and gas production unless the industry changes the fact that it is competing for the same water we use to grow our food.
Frank
11:28AM AUG 11TH 2012
What energy source did you expect an American Petroleum Institute economist to promote?

Perhaps if the oil industry hadn't fought so hard against alternative energy sources for the last 20 years, we'd have that new tree by now.
LDouglas
3:03PM AUG 11TH 2012
True Frank. I know you're not fond of conspiracy theories but I have one about the American Petroleum Institute.

From what I've been reading, this whole drill baby drill and we'll be awash in cheap gas and energy has me believing it's not much more than a tactic to get Gov. Romney elected. Then the API can lock in every last drop of our federal reserves of oil and natural gas at today's prices, then sit on them until the day they can reap even bigger profits.

For instance, I just read an article that states the report by the Congressional Budget Office prepared at the behest of Paul D. Ryan, calculated revenues assuming ANWR holds at best 8 billion barrels of oil (which is a little over a years worth of "energy independence"). Assuming it isn't sold on the world market.

(It also stated opening up ANWR and the federal lands and parts of the Atlantic, Pacific and Florida coasts together would add less than 5% of what the federal budget already stands to get over 10 years from oil and gas leases on federal land already open to drilling.)

In other words, what they're fighting for opening is a spit in the bucket compared to what's already opened.

But I look forward to seeing Mr. Romney elected because if he has a shred of honesty and ethics we can get on with planting in earnest the trees we're going to need more than ever 20 years from now- renewable, sustainable sources of energy.

And actually all the better if his VP, Rep. Paul Ryan sticks to his words and ends "Cronyism and Corporate Welfare" because if he does that in earnest, which would include externalized costs, there's no way oil, coal, or nuclear can compete with renewables for long.
LDouglas
8:27PM AUG 14TH 2012
Well it looks like I'm out of luck. I just read a piece on Grist that claims Paul Ryan would keep the subsidies to oil in his budget plan. So much for ending cronyism and corporate welfare.

So incredibly disheartening...
http:
//grist.
org/
politics
/paul-ryans-budget-plan-is-very-nice-to-big-oil/

Leave a Comment on This Story

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.