Politics

Unveiling Today: Rubio Key in Bipartisan Senators' Blueprint for Immigration

By: Nancy Smith | Posted: January 28, 2013 3:55 AM

Marco Rubio

U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio | Sunshine State News Archives

Marco Rubio of Florida has been a key player in a bipartisan group of eight senators looking to effect a top-to-bottom overhaul of the nation's immigration system.

The blueprint -- to be unveiled in Washington on Monday, one day before President Obama outlines his own, more liberal immigration proposals -- includes a pathway to American citizenship for 11 million illegal immigrants and will hinge on progress in securing the borders and ensuring that foreigners leave the country when their visas expire.

“There’s always political ramifications to everything we do or fail to do, but my motivation on immigration is not the politics of it,” Rubio told Florida Watchdog last week. “My motivation is to solve a serious problem that our country faces, my community faces, my state faces.”

The rising star of the GOP is seen as the most conservative voice calling for reform.

Rubio, a Cuban-American, insisted on including the exit tracking system as one of the triggers for opening the path to citizenship for illegal immigrants. He said he's seen estimates that as many as 40 percent of immigrants in the country illegally have overstayed their visas.

 

In order to put his name to the document, Rubio insisted that any immigrants who gained legal status under the legislation “be required to go to the back of the line” behind other immigrants who applied to come through legal channels.

Besides Rubio, the eight senators expected to endorse the new principles Monday are Democrats Charles Schumer of New York, Dick Durbin of Illinois, Robert Menendez of New Jersey and Michael Bennet of Colorado; and Republicans John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, and Jeff Flake of Arizona.

Other aspects of the senators' plan include:

* An immediate strengthening of border security with new technology, including aerial drones, for border patrol agents.

* A Department of Homeland Security blueprint for expanding exit control -- doing as a job of tracking departures of foreigners who leave the country by land as is now done at most airports and seaports.

*  Immigrants here illegally registering with the government. After passing background checks and paying back taxes and fines, those immigrants would receive a “probationary legal status.” Such status would give them the right to live and work legally in the United States. Important: They would not be eligible for most federal public benefits.

* Establishment of a mandatory nationwide program to verify the legal status of new hires. The details of whether that would include some form of identity card remain sketchy. 

*  Proposed enforcement measures be complete before any immigrant on probationary status can earn a green card.

* Offer major exemptions from requirements for citizenship to young immigrants here illegally, who came to United States as children; it would give them a faster path to becoming Americans.

* Giving immigrant farmworkers a separate and faster path to citizenship.

Sticking points ahead include difficult negotiations over how long immigrants who gain provisional status would have to wait before applying for citizenship. Rubio’s ideas, for instance, are for a far longer and less direct pathway than Democrats would like. 

Rubio was also sponsor of an accompanying bill to offer more visas to highly educated technology workers. It is expected to become part of the more comprehensive measure the other senators are preparing. 



Reach Nancy Smith at nsmith@sunshinestatenews.com or at (850) 727-0859. 

 

 

 






 


Comments (7)

LDouglas
2:15PM JAN 28TH 2013
"Giving immigrant farmworkers a separate and faster path to citizenship."

I don't get this. We're told the reason agriculture needs illegal immigrants is because a lot of times the work is seasonal, and because it's a job Americans won't do because they can collect benefits about equal to what they'd earn after working all week in the fields.

No- no- no on this Mr. Rubio. They should have guest worker status only. It is not going to be cheap labor if they become Americans and we have to supplement that income as well as educate their children.
Up the guest worker visas for ag. And to help keep guestworkers from being exploited, allow them in, in lots or something so farmers have to attract them- or something like that. But do not give citizenship preference to ag workers. We have enough poor and un or undereducated.

Another thing your immigration reform needs to address is chain migration. It won't be acceptable without some sort of cap on family members. Giving citizenship to one person can open the door to any number of his family members.
Frank
5:43PM JAN 28TH 2013
Yes, you must be right . . . "It is not going to be cheap labor if they become Americans" . . . . yes, we want slaves . . . . so, "to help keep guestworkers from being exploited, allow them in, in lots or something" . . . . chain gangs of cheap workers without their families . . . . disposable cheap workers, without rights, without benefits . . . so, far right Republican . . . and absolutely . . .

Pathetic . . .
LDouglas
8:40AM JAN 29TH 2013
That isn't it. I do care about their well being. I just don't think we should give them a fast track to citizenship. If they were here legally they would get better treatment and they would be able to go back and forth across the border legally. If they left their families at home they would improve things in their country without hurting ours. What I had in mind by letting them in lots is so farmers using the guestworker visas wouldn't have the upper hand. (Seriously, I care about them. I advocated for the rise in price in picking tomatoes and also continuously advocate for their well being when it comes to pesticide exposure- among other things.) But the US is under stress and we have growing fundamental problems that won't be easier to solve when there is more of us.
Frank
10:55AM JAN 29TH 2013
I got mine, close the door behind me approach . . . haven't seen the details yet, but farm workers are to have a separate path to citizenship than other workers . . . .
LDouglas
1:14PM JAN 29TH 2013
Ultimately, it's a population problem. I'd just like to make sure population growth is sustainable. But in any case, I lose mine, you lose yours and the wages of the future don't keep up with the rising cost of living, we become as poor and corrupt as the places people come here from and what good would it be to be an American anyway?

Open borders won't solve the world's (or Mexico's) problems. It'll just shift them to us.
Frank
4:46PM JAN 29TH 2013
And you really believe you can keep immigrants out, outside of creating basically a police state and kill zones like the Berlin Wall . . . . won't happen . . . . there's always Canada and the Gulf, Atlantic and Pacific coasts . . . .
Delmar Jackson
12:42PM JAN 28TH 2013
This proposal is nearly identical the the failed 2006/2007 Amnesty that the cheap labor lobby tried to ram down our throats.

This proposal once again rewards lawbreakers with citizenship, increases legal immigration over the current massive 1 million immigrants a year further depressing wages and stealing job opportunities from working class Americans, and wants to scrap the present E verify system and start over. Of course, the ACLU has vowed to take any worker verification system to court.


There is no immigration problem that needs to be "fixed".


Immigration was "fixed" in 1986 when we gave amnesty to over 3 million illegals in exchange for strict enforcement of our laws so we would never need to give another amnesty..


The problem is not immigration, but the unwillingness by those that profit from immigration to enforce our laws.Unless you "fix" the problem of weasels refusing to enforce our laws or abide by their promises, no amount of fine words or "fixing" will ever accomplish a thing.


As for the millions here illegally, and what will happen to them if we cut off their jobs and benefits? they will go home. There will be ranting and raving and gnashing of teeth and calling those that enforce the laws all sorts of terrible names, but they should save their drama for those that caused the problem, which are those that refused to enforce the laws and those that broke them.


read vdare every day and join numbersusa

Leave a Comment on This Story

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.