Profile in Partisanship: Wasserman Schultz Passes on Weiner

By: Kenric Ward | Posted: June 7, 2011 11:10 AM
Kenric Ward 150x207

Kenric Ward

Either Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz isn't too bright and in over her head, or she's blinded by partisanship. Since the two categories are not mutually exclusive, let's say she's both.

In yet another example of political cream rising to the top, the four-term congresswoman from the 20th District of Florida was picked by President Barack Obama to lead the Democratic National Committee this year.

But DWS's leadership was nowhere to be found in l'affair Weiner this week. Blithely pigeonholing Rep. Anthony Weiner's admitted online sex antics as "a personal matter," she left it to minority leader Nancy Pelosi to call for a House investigation.

Indeed, Wasserman Schultz appears to be running on auto-pilot. On CBS's "Early Morning" show Friday, she stated, "I think this is a personal matter, and that's how it should be left." She repeated that exact phrase, with various unhelpful embellishments, six more times in the course of the program.

Talking points drive this society's political patter, but mind-numbing, grossly partisan regurgitation just sounds stupid. And then there are the contradictions.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Take DWS's recent call for Americans to drive American cars. This from a woman who has two foreign vehicles licensed in her name. Can she really be that clueless or dissembling? Or, in her arrogance, does she think that no one will call her on it?

Back during the Mark Foley intern affair, DWS was all righteous indignation.

"This goes beyond Representative Foley; it goes to the values of the congressional leadership. These are not family values, these are not American values," the congresswoman harrumphed.

She even demanded the resignation of then-Speaker Denny Hastert for not addressing the Foley matter quickly enough.

Anthony Weiner

Rep. Anthony Weiner

At that time, DWS immediately demanded a vigorous investigation.

Today, Democratic apologists argue that the Weiner and Foley affairs are fundamentally different. But the defining difference is that Foley (who resigned) was a Republican and Weiner (who says he won't) is a Democrat.

For those needing a tighter analogy, recall that New York Republican Rep. Christopher Lee had the good grace to resign after admitting to Weiner-like shenanigans.

Whatever happens with Weiner, DWS has made her craven double standards crystal clear.

Her body of work is rank partisanship. As chairwoman of the DNC, she's devolved into the perfect party drone. As one wag put it: Debbie Does Dullest.

Yet barring some radical redistricting by lawmakers in Florida and New York, both DWS and Weiner are safe for re-election in 2012 (unless he still intends to run for mayor of New York City, which cannot be ruled out).

Sunshine State News' request for comment from DWS's office went unanswered.


Contact Kenric Ward at or at (772) 801-5341.

Comments (5)

9:36PM JUN 8TH 2011
Didn't Mark Foley's conduct involve a minor child who was a page in Congress? If I'm correct about that, I think it makes a big difference because I don't think Weiner's conduct involved minors or anyone associated with or employed by Congress.
7:19PM JUN 7TH 2011
Good article. I just can't understand what the wag meant by Debbie Does Dullest. Huh???
3:38PM JUN 7TH 2011
Democrats = the reincarnation of the tricky-Dick party. "I am not a pervert!!!"
12:48PM JUN 7TH 2011
I have no respect for party leaders of any party who won't call out, or denounce people in their own party when they do wrong. (At least they could feign displeasure so they don't look too dumb to hide their hypocrisy.)

Otherwise, Mr. Ward, the one thing Mr. Weiner got right was when he said the "jokes write themselves".
Angry Citizen
12:18PM JUN 7TH 2011
Ken, Ken, Ken, don't you understand? When it is a Democrat it is always a personal matter. When it is a Republican it is National Security! The reason is clear. Democrats do nothing when it comes to National Security or morality for that matter.

Personally, I think it is much simpler than that. Weiner said that he knows of at least six women that he has had "personal" Tweets, phone calls etc. with. Could it be that one of them was, is DWS? I think we should check her phone as well.

Leave a Comment on This Story

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.