Politics
Scott Moves to Keep Prison Privatization Alive
Around the State
Gov. Rick Scott has his office working to determine what he can do to keep up the effort to bid out the services of up to 26 Central and South Florida correctional institutions this session.
With the private outsourcing effort projected by state economists to save at least $16.5 million a year, Scott is trying to determine if he can proceed on his own or through other means after the Florida Senate -- with 10 Republicans joining the entire Democratic roster -- rejected a bill on the future management of the facilities on Tuesday.
“I’m disappointed the Senate didn’t do that; I’m going to look at what I have the opportunity to do,” Scott told reporters while at the Pat Thomas Law Enforcement Academy in Havana Thursday morning.
“I’m going to make sure we don’t waste money in the state.”
There has been unconfirmed talk throughout the Capitol that Scott could act on his own to proceed with privatization -- an effort approved by the Legislature a year ago but halted by a judge in late September.
Senate President Mike Haridopolos, R-Merritt Island, said after the vote that further cuts would have to come from education and health care.
Scott, noting that he didn’t include the privatization effort in his proposed budget for the coming year, said the Senate had a chance to save money for health care and education.
“I got elected to hold the government accountable, to not waste taxpayers’ money,” Scott said. “So here was an opportunity that the Senate had, to give us an opportunity to save us a significant amount of money.”
The outsourcing effort was approved as part of the state budget in the previous session, only to be overturned by a Leon County Circuit Court judge who accepted the Florida Police Benevolent Association’s argument that the privatization effort should have been done as a separate bill.
The state continues to challenge the court ruling.
For many of those in the Senate opposed to the privatization bill, the question was more a matter of public safety than cost-cutting.
Sen. Mike Fasano, R-New Port Richey, whose opposition to privatization cost him seats on two budget committees, including a chairmanship, said he hopes Scott will consider the Senate’s vote before proceeding further on the issue.
“It’s his prerogative, but I hope he learned that the direction that was abandoned is not the direction that the taxpayers of Florida wanted to go,” Fasano said.
The Senate vote was declared a victory by unions representing the nearly 4,000 correction workers who would have been affected by the conversion from state to private management.
Ken Wood, acting president of Teamsters Local 2011 in Tampa, which represents 20,000 corrections officers, also said the Senate vote reflected the will of the citizens.
“Floridians do not want the rules changed so private companies can get secret contracts with no cost-benefit analysis and no public review,” Wood stated in a release on Thursday.
As part of the plan, none of the prisons would have been turned over to a private company if the bids failed to provide the state with at least 7 percent savings from the existing costs.
The effort to privatize came as the Department of Corrections is moving forward with plans to close 11 facilities because of an overall drop in the prison population statewide. The full House and the Senate Budget Committee have since budgeted money to keep one of the prisons, the Jefferson Correctional Facility, open due to concerns about the economic impact of the closing on the community.
Reach Jim Turner at jturner@sunshinestatenews.com or at (772) 215-9889.
With the private outsourcing effort projected by state economists to save at least $16.5 million a year, Scott is trying to determine if he can proceed on his own or through other means after the Florida Senate -- with 10 Republicans joining the entire Democratic roster -- rejected a bill on the future management of the facilities on Tuesday.
Sorry, you need to install flash to see this content.
“I’m going to make sure we don’t waste money in the state.”
There has been unconfirmed talk throughout the Capitol that Scott could act on his own to proceed with privatization -- an effort approved by the Legislature a year ago but halted by a judge in late September.
Senate President Mike Haridopolos, R-Merritt Island, said after the vote that further cuts would have to come from education and health care.
Scott, noting that he didn’t include the privatization effort in his proposed budget for the coming year, said the Senate had a chance to save money for health care and education.
“I got elected to hold the government accountable, to not waste taxpayers’ money,” Scott said. “So here was an opportunity that the Senate had, to give us an opportunity to save us a significant amount of money.”
The outsourcing effort was approved as part of the state budget in the previous session, only to be overturned by a Leon County Circuit Court judge who accepted the Florida Police Benevolent Association’s argument that the privatization effort should have been done as a separate bill.
The state continues to challenge the court ruling.
For many of those in the Senate opposed to the privatization bill, the question was more a matter of public safety than cost-cutting.
Sen. Mike Fasano, R-New Port Richey, whose opposition to privatization cost him seats on two budget committees, including a chairmanship, said he hopes Scott will consider the Senate’s vote before proceeding further on the issue.
“It’s his prerogative, but I hope he learned that the direction that was abandoned is not the direction that the taxpayers of Florida wanted to go,” Fasano said.
The Senate vote was declared a victory by unions representing the nearly 4,000 correction workers who would have been affected by the conversion from state to private management.
Ken Wood, acting president of Teamsters Local 2011 in Tampa, which represents 20,000 corrections officers, also said the Senate vote reflected the will of the citizens.
“Floridians do not want the rules changed so private companies can get secret contracts with no cost-benefit analysis and no public review,” Wood stated in a release on Thursday.
Sorry, you need to install flash to see this content.
The effort to privatize came as the Department of Corrections is moving forward with plans to close 11 facilities because of an overall drop in the prison population statewide. The full House and the Senate Budget Committee have since budgeted money to keep one of the prisons, the Jefferson Correctional Facility, open due to concerns about the economic impact of the closing on the community.
Reach Jim Turner at jturner@sunshinestatenews.com or at (772) 215-9889.

Comments (18)
People! there's more to this than just the budget. Your talking peoples jobs and families. Without these people NO prision would run state or private. It seems these employees are the ones getting the short end of the stick.
FYI Sgt. Monk........ there is a private sector of our military. Do a search and you'll be surprized at what you'll find. Also by the way, I do and have worked with many ex-state correctional officers, sergeants, lieutenants, captains, admin captains, chief of security, assistant wardens and even wardens. So yes they do leave the state to come work for private.
FBOP Retired.......... you said the private prision lost due to labor cost right? Not that it wasn't ran as good as a state facility or better. Hhhmmm, interesting because everybody thinks a private facility is not up to par compared to a state facility. Thanks for the info FBOP
It's not very common!!!!!
Whats even more funny is, people think because it's a private it's not as good as the DOC! Are you kidding me! Their medical departments are farthure advance then most of the state run prisons. They have programs to help teach inmates skills to help them become working citizens. They offer re-entry programs. Drug and alcohol programs, GED programs, even CDL classes. The list goes on and on!! Ya, private can do it cheap, cause they don't waste money. It's a business. Provide a service for X amount of dollars.
My wife used to work for the DOC, so I've heard many stories of what goes on out of the public eyes. And with having children, our education budget is constantly being cut.
Folks! wake up! If we don't provide good education to our children then one day you might be visiting them at one of these prisons.
As far as them saying if this passes then 4000 state employees will be out jobs......REALLY??? Who do you think private is going to hire to run the prisions???? Think about it!
You crack me up, ha-ha-ha. Whew boy, my side is hurting. Better benefits (I can even spell it) you say? Broo ha ha. Parties and extra activities? Oh my gosh. Wow! Where did you come from? Under a rock?
If for some reason it costs, 10 dollars for the department of corrections to manage the prison population then surely in the name of shareholder wealth six dollars will not last very long. As a citizen and republican I almost demand that questions be answered before this nightmare be released on the public. Privatization of prisons are not a new concept and there are numerous examples of organizations who have been catastrophic failures when they came to the county or states only to admit failure and hand over the keys to the asylum. Surely private prisons does not avail the taxpayer liability.
I for one can only imagine when the constitution was written that the framers knew certain functions would be necessary functions of the government to avoid the greed of the private sector. It scares me to ponder the thought of private for profit police departments, fire departments, paramedics and prisons even if there are idiots with spreadsheets who can show nominal savings, especially when those saving come at the expense of individual service through small items like wages and benefit packages only to make a stuffed suit who knows little and cares less about public safety rich.
I for one am sick of libertarians who have invaded the republican party who simply preach the value of free market solutions for everything. Everywhere I look I see free market solutions and to be honest I have yet to be impressed, banking, manufacturing or you name it. Seems like the free markets have been handed everything on a silver platter, free trade, low taxes, less individual rights and the ability of the top to shelter in foreign places. Look around I am still not impressed. The US and Florida remains in trouble economically. CEO Scott where are the jobs?
KUDOs to the 10 senators who opposed the CEO Governor, I can only hope more get with the program or suffer primary candidates. As for the CEO running an end around the legislature, I believe the judicial branch will get it right.
To the media please continue to follow the relational money trail between the CEO and the private prison companies. These days it seems you can predict how the politicians will behave based off of whose money idol they are bowing too
RepublicanConsience - it's not just about saving money, it's also about public safety, which *IS* the responsibility of government and would be compromised with privatization. I did not hear Scott utter the words public safety once! Requiring cost savings with a lack of accountability for public safety is a recipe for disaster! But then again, that's Scott's forte.
Scott is doing the right thing and the Republicans in the Senate that voted against the privatization, watch your back you will be primaried over this basic defining issue. No more RINOs, No Compromise, No Surrender. Lead or get out of the way.
There are also inmates that are in need of Mental Health services. State and Federal Courts have mandated that these inmates receive these services. Unfortunately Psychologists don’t work for free.
And then there are inmates who, believe it or not, are just downright mean. Because of their behavior problems, they require tougher security measures. This may mean more Correctional Officers per mean inmate and in a more secure facility.
Private prisons do not want the extra expense OR liability of these costlier inmates. But they have to be locked up by somebody and guess who that somebody is? Did you guess the public (state) prison system? If you did then you are correct. This is what is commonly called in the industry as “cherry picking”. So, as you can see, of course the private companies can do it cheaper when they don’t have all these added expenses in their way. It is what I like to call, comparing apples to oranges.
This concludes my lesson on Prisons 101.
Leave a Comment on This Story