Politics
Rick Scott: Obamacare Fight Is Just Beginning
Around the State

Gov. Rick Scott | Credit: Gage Skidmore - Flickr
And the Affordable Care Act should be one of the defining issues of this year’s presidential and other federal elections.
Scott released a statement Sunday declaring that Florida will join South Carolina and any other state that opts out of the Medicaid expansion in the Affordable Care Act and won't set up insurance exchanges, the optional measures of the law.
On Monday, appearing on Fox News and CNBC’s Squawk Box, Scott vowed that he and Attorney General Pam Bondi, who continued the state’s opposition to the law all the way to the Supreme Court, would make repealing the federal law a hallmark of their terms, before the costs of the federal program become a burden for Florida’s taxpayers once it kicks in in 2014.
“It’s not free,” Scott said on Fox News. “It’s $1.9 billion a year. You’re still paying it. Florida taxpayers are paying federal taxes and (the federal government is) only going to cover it for the first three years, then Florida taxpayers are going to be on the hook.”
Scott added that having to shift money in the state budget to cover increases in Medicaid will come at the expense of public education.
A Kaiser Family Foundation report estimates that the Act would expand coverage to nearly 1 million Floridians, extending coverage to anyone earning less than $14,500 a year. Currently, a parent earning less than $6,478 a year is covered by the state’s Medicaid program.
For Scott and Bondi electing officials such as presumptive GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney and other like-minded congressional candidates this year should be the first step in halting the law.
Scott said getting people jobs, where they offer health care coverage, should be the priority of officials. Also, coverage should reward people for not smoking, exercising, eating right.
“If you want to fix the system, and you actually want to make sure that people get health care, then use the free market,” Scott said. “Make sure that individuals know what things cost. Make sure providers (are available and offer) more competition, which drives down the price.”
Bondi has called the law an “overreach” by the federal government.
Meanwhile, Democratic leaders in Florida's Legislature are urging Scott to implement the law and solve Florida’s health care crisis.
State Sen. Nan Rich, D-Weston, claims Scott is putting ideology over his constitutional obligations.
“Pitting health care reform against education funding is the same false argument Governor Scott attempted to use during the last legislative session," Rich, who is running for governor in 2014, stated in a release.
"This is the same governor that wanted to slash public education by 10 percent; the same governor that signed a budget raiding public universities’ reserves and operating funds by $300 million; the same governor who has no problem doling out hundreds of millions of unaccountable tax dollars to corporations to create phantom jobs; and the same governor that touts a dropping unemployment rate but ignores the real reason that rate is dropping – namely, that more Floridians are simply giving up because his ‘job-creating’ strategy has been just another empty promise.
“One of the greatest ironies in his decision to forestall any action until the presidential election is the fact that the candidate he’s supporting created an almost identical health care system while governor of Massachusetts – with the exception that his mandated penalties for failing to obtain 'Romneycare' were much higher than the new national plan.
Florida House Democratic Leader-designate Perry Thurston, D-Plantation, called Scott's push against Obamacare "a colossal abdication" of responsibility.
“Lost in Governor Scott’s insensitive statements in the wake of the ruling on the Affordable Care Act is an apparent failure to recognize that all Florida residents and businesses have an inherent stake in making sure there are good health outcomes for Floridians," Thurston stated in a release. "The status quo only continues a costly reliance on hospital emergency rooms for treatment to the poor, which wastes resources and drives up costs for other consumers and businesses.
“Governor Scott’s defiance renders him incapable of recognizing that health insurance exchanges authorized under the Affordable Care Act embrace free-market principles and promote personal responsibility by allowing consumers to comparison shop in purchasing health coverage.”
Reach Jim Turner at jturner@sunshinestatenews.com or at (850) 215-9889.


Comments (26)
We're well over a dozen unconstitutional court findings by now.
It seems in Florida, under this administration and legislature, we have to force governance through court decrees. Some leadership.
And it appears Rick Scott just wants more of the same for our future.
FALSE ELSEWHERE - Rick Scott, again --> Rationing. Scott said on Fox News Monday night that the ACA will mean health care in this country will be like it is in Great Britain and Canada. "But you don't get it, because it's rationed" [PolitiFact, 7/3/12]
PANTS-ON-FIRE FALSE - Rick Scott --> Scott told Fox's Greta van Susteren on Friday night that he spoke with a small business owner, with only 20 employees, who relayed fears that he would go out of business because he couldn't afford to buy mandatory insurance [PolitiFact, 7/3/12].
Can Rick Scott ever not lie about ANYTHING concerning Obama and the Affordable Care Act, or is his Tea Party rhetoric of "Big Lie" politics just terminal at this point?
It will happen right here in Florida. Oh, Rick Scott may delay implementation of a few optional provisions, but he won't have a say in implementation of most of the law, so I don't have to go to Illinois.
Oh, but you may wish to once medical costs continue to sky rocket here in Florida due to Scott's "Let'em have emergency room care" strategy of driving up Florida's medical insurance costs.
Yes, with its future of toll roads everywhere; paying for private schools, prisons and hospitals with public money; shifting all possible state costs onto local governments; increased fees for parks, licenses and services while providing up to $1 billion in public subsidies to for-profit private development to relocate into the state, plus tax breaks for the few years they're here; and the impoverishment of our university system forcing students to have to pay for significantly increased tuition; you actually may want to relocate out of Florida to one of them liberal states that got it right, 'cause Florida's no longer going to be affordable in the future.
And for that, you'll be able to thank Rick Scott, and the sheeple Tea Party legislators who follow the dictates of state Senators like Budget Chairman J.D. Alexander who got his term limited going away gifts of growth management legislation that directly provide for his massive development plans in central Florida, along with his own, un-needed new university and major new Central Florida tollroad system. All being paid for at the public money trough.
I mean Rick Scott's already been there once, making hundreds of millions while CEO from a medical company involved in having to pay out about $2 billion for its massive Medicare fraud from the public.
How much do you think will be able to be made from the public trough during his tenure as CEO of the fourth largest state?
Yes, your Florida has quite a future - just expect to pay through the nose to all those special interests out there, and receive little to nothing in return.
The Tea Parties should be so proud - they've now gotten themselves into a circular firing squad, with only the rich getting richer and all from your public money being used for private interests.
I can see that the beginnings of Mad Hatter Disorder are still present, or are the demonizing "moron" and "parasite" just involuntarily coming out.
In that case, the disorder must be progressing. I'm sorry, a mind is such a terrible facility to lose. The involuntary utterance of socially inappropriate and derogatory remarks is known as coprolalia, is a clear progressive symptom of Mad Hatter Disorder, and unfortunately, in your case, it does appear to be progressing.
I would suggest you quickly seek professional help.
Might I suggest a list of qualified physicians supporting the new Affordable Care Act?
Yes, I'm sure in your own mind all doctors that belong to the American Medical Association, American Cancer Society and American Heart Association which are supporting the Affordable Care Act are all quacks and crappy doctors.
Yes, I'm sure in your own mind, everyone who doesn't believe what you do must be unproductive, living off other people's money and arrogantly think of themselves as the "leadership class".
So sad, so sad, you really do need help for your delusions of self-importance as has now become abundantly clear to everyone.
Seek help, seek help soon.
Obamacare is a house of cards that will come tumbling down taking the economy with it. It does not reward hardworking Americans nor does it encourage self-reliance and personal responsibility for our actions. It rewards laziness and irresponsibility. The Great Society’s programs encouraged fathers to abandon their families and rewarded single mothers. More and more Americans (46%) do NOT PAY INCOME TAXES and why should they work for a living as long as they have someone to promise them the world?
We've had good reason to know both the Florida and U.S. Constitution as it has been the Republicans who want to trash them every other day.
You must just be visiting or you'd know that.
On a day when you've lost another constitutional ruling (this time on prohibiting doctors' first amendment right to discuss guns with their patients), you demonstrate once again that you don't really care about the citizens (employees) under your CEO-style leadership.
You'd rather have the poor obtaining their health care expensively at emergency rooms than through medicaid paid 100% to 90% by the federal government until at least 2020. That's guaranteed to drive up everyone else's health care costs in the state - the hospitals that provide emergency care, and the insurance companies that have to reflect those hospital costs in insurance rates. What have you accomplished - NOTHING, except driving up health costs.
And the medical insurance exchanges - if the state doesn't help set them up, the feds will. What have you accomplished - NOTHING, except having no say in the exchanges.
Great CEO leadership, just like at Columbia/HCA which experienced the largest fined Medicare fraud for activities occurring during your tenure.
Now you'd abandon a role in your poorest citizens' health care needs. Pathetic.
We need a Governor who actually cares about the citizens of this state, and not one who still thinks his role is as a CEO and wants to throw a "fire everyone" tanturm whenever the courts rule against him and his idealogical beliefs.
We need grown up leadership, and not that of one reflecting a truculent 12-year old who keeps having to have the adults tell him by court decree when he can and can't do what he wants to do.
We are all familiar with the cliche definition of insanity. Why then, do we still look to Washington D.C., to the White House, the Congress and the Courts to solve the very problems they have created? That's insane.
The solution to ridding Florida of the Patient Care Affordability Act or "Obamacare" lawlessness is NULLIFICATION!
The States,who are the creators of the federal government and who agree to its existence by a compact we call the constitution are fully empowered to decide for themselves to not comply with any act that is outside the scope of federal authority as enumerated in the constitution.
The Florida Tenth Amendment Center in conjunction with LibertyTakeOver 2012 is fully committed to the nullification of The Affordability Act in our State of Florida.
"States should not fear the consequences of nullification. As per Thursday’s Supreme Court ruling, Congress is not permitted to penalize states that refuse to implement ObamaCare. In the majority decision, Chief Justice Roberts stated, “What Congress is not free to do is to penalize States that choose not to participate in that new program by taking away their existing Medicaid funding. However, he added, “Nothing in our opinion precludes Congress from offering funds under the [law] to expand the availability of health care, and requiring that states accepting such funds comply with the conditions on their use.”
Are you willing to trade this latest loss of LIBERTY for a few extra "federal dollars?"
Tenth Amendment Center communications director Mike Maharrey contends that states that utilize nullification to reject ObamaCare are simply responding to a rebellious federal government that refuses to act within its constitutional limits:
"Who is really behaving lawlessly here? A federal government that refuses to operate within its delegated powers, and rips authority away from the states and the people? Or the states, working through legitimate democratic processes, saying, "No! We don’t accept this"? I would argue it’s the federal government that’s in rebellion, and it’s time for the states to put a check on illegitimate federal power."
WHAT YOU CAN DO-
1. Pledge to vote ONLY for those running for Florida State House and the Florida Senate who will introduce or co-sponsor our Federal Health Care Nullification Act by signing the petition below.
2. Click HERE and print out the Florida Healthcare Nullification Act and give it to the candidates in your area and ask them to sign it.
3. E-Mail the signed copy to alex@libertytakeover2012.com or mail it to 1334 Tampa Road, Suite 2 Palm Harbor, Florida 34683
4. If the State House or State Senate candidate in your district WILL NOT SIGN the Federal Health Care Nullification pledge, let them know they DO NOT HAVE YOUR VOTE regardless of party affiliation and E-Mail alex@libertytakeover2012.com the name of the candidate who would not sign it.
Let the incumbents and those who aspire to State government KNOW that you are dead serious and will not be compromised on this issue:
I_________________________pledge my vote to ONLY that candidate for Florida House or Senate who will introduce or co sponsor the Tenth Amendment Center Federal Health Care Nullification Act.
Nullification, a myth that the Supreme Court has shot down whenever it's been raised.
Mr. Nappi has not provided one modern U.S. Supreme Court case supporting this unique legal theory that the states can nullify and override federal legislation they don't like. In fact, the court has stated just the opposite, in line with Articles III and IV of the Constitution.
We're not refighting slavery, nor even segregation, again.
Grow up, Mr. Nappi, and join the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries and stop nonsense we can easily show has no merit and wastes everyone's time and valuable commenting space.
Or sue the federal government based on your nullification theory.
We'd LOVE to see that foolishness. Of course you don't have the conviction of your beliefs. You're not willing to open yourself to the resulting court abuse, are you?
No, you're just another self-aggrandizing right wing nut, oblivious to the reality around you, but important in your own mind.
Meanwhile, hiding behind one name only, if it's even real, you resort to name calling, a sure sign of the weak mind.
I will not dignify your comments any further or attempt to dialogue with someone who is ignorant of his country's history and constitution.
As I said, the key test is take your nullification to this conservative Supreme Court and see what happens. I know, because it's already happened several times in my lifetime. They'll throw nullification out . . . .again, and likely it will be 9-0.
See, for example, Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 (1958) where the court (9-0) stated that for integration, that its implementation "can neither be nullified openly and directly by state legislators or state executive or judicial officers nor nullified indirectly by them through evasive schemes for segregation whether attempted 'ingeniously or ingenuously.' "
We can also cite earlier Supreme Court cases, if you'd like, some even BEFORE the Civil War.
The question still remains - where is your U.S. Supreme Court case upholding nullification? ANSWER - there aren't any.
My previous comments all stand.
Leave a Comment on This Story