Government
Rick Scott's Order for Random Drug Tests Draws ACLU Ire
Around the State
Gov. Rick Scott announced a new executive order Tuesday, mandating drug tests for “all prospective new hires of agencies within the governor’s purview” and random drug tests for established employees in those offices -- but the order is already drawing fire from the ACLU.
“Floridians deserve to know that those in public service, whose salaries are paid with taxpayer dollars, are part of a drug-free workplace,” Scott said in a statement. “Just as it is appropriate to screen those seeking taxpayer assistance, it is also appropriate to screen government employees.”
Scott also praised a measure in the Legislature which would require that welfare recipients face drug testing, which was being sponsored by Republicans Paula Dockery of Lakeland and Steve Oelrich of Gainesville in the Senate and Republicans Chris Dorworth of Heathrow and Jimmie Smith of Tampa in the House.
“I want to commend Senators Steve Oelrich and Paula Dockery, and Representatives Jimmie Smith and Chris Dorworth, for their hard work on this issue,” Scott said. “Today’s committee passage by the Senate of Senate Bill 556 has advanced this important policy, and I look forward to the House moving their legislation tomorrow.”
The House version of the legislation, having already passed the Health and Human Services Access Subcommittee earlier in the month, will face the Rulemaking and Regulation Subcommittee on Wednesday. The measure is also expected to be taken up by the Judiciary Committee, the Health Care Appropriations Subcommittee and the Health and Human Services Committee.
The governor’s executive order quickly came under fire. Later on Wednesday, Howard Simon, the executive director of the Florida ACLU, pointed to a 2004 case which, he maintained, found that random drug testing of state workers is unconstitutional.
“I’m not sure why Governor Scott does not know that the policy he recreated by executive order today has already been declared unconstitutional,” said Simon. “The state of Florida cannot force people to surrender their constitutional rights in order to work for the state. Absent any evidence of illegal drug use, or assigned a safety-sensitive job, people have a right to be left alone.”
Simon took aim at Scott, arguing that the executive order was hypocritical coming from Scott, who pledged to fight for a smaller, less intrusive government during the 2010 election cycle.
“Coming from a governor who promised to protect our freedoms by limiting the intrusive reach of government into our personal lives, this massive expansion of government power at the expense of basic rights is stunning and exposes the state to serious future legal liability,” added Simon. “Since we have already succeeded once in overturning this unconstitutional expansion of government power, the ACLU of Florida is willing to represent any state employee or association of state employees who will have their rights infringed upon if the announced policy takes effect.”
Reach Kevin Derby at kderby@sunshinestatenews.com or at (850) 727-0859.

Comments (10)
It is time for Mr. Scott to get serious regarding the federal government's over reach and costs to the State of Florida. More importantly it is time for him to move on from demonizing state workers and using them as a class warfare card for continued "Tea Party" support. Time to move on Governor, there are bigger issues to tackle than belittling your employess in the press everyday.
The GOP is following the Dubya Doctrine, which says the Constitution is "just a damn piece of paper."
For instance, if an otherwise okay mother of three tests positive for say marijuana, what will happen to her children? Will they have to go without assistance? Will they become homeless? Placed in foster care? Will we jail her? If she's in the middle of treatment for a chronic illness will she immediately be cut off? Or how about her children? Will they be cut off routine medical care? Will they then have to rely on the emergency room?
Aren't legislators and their staffs considered state workers and paid with taxpayer funds? Will they be tested?
It just seems so unsanitary, invasive and expensive. Where are all those little cups going to go and who will profit?
Leave a Comment on This Story