Government

Rick Scott's Order for Random Drug Tests Draws ACLU Ire

Governor wants tests for state employees and welfare recipients
By: Kevin Derby | Posted: March 23, 2011 3:55 AM

Gov. Rick Scott announced a new executive order Tuesday, mandating drug tests for “all prospective new hires of agencies within the governor’s purview” and random drug tests for established employees in those offices -- but the order is already drawing fire from the ACLU.

“Floridians deserve to know that those in public service, whose salaries are paid with taxpayer dollars, are part of a drug-free workplace,” Scott said in a statement. “Just as it is appropriate to screen those seeking taxpayer assistance, it is also appropriate to screen government employees.”

Scott also praised a measure in the Legislature which would require that welfare recipients face drug testing, which was being sponsored by Republicans Paula Dockery of Lakeland and Steve Oelrich of Gainesville in the Senate and Republicans Chris Dorworth of Heathrow and Jimmie Smith of Tampa in the House.

“I want to commend Senators Steve Oelrich and Paula Dockery, and Representatives Jimmie Smith and Chris Dorworth, for their hard work on this issue,” Scott said. “Today’s committee passage by the Senate of Senate Bill 556 has advanced this important policy, and I look forward to the House moving their legislation tomorrow.”

The House version of the legislation, having already passed the Health and Human Services Access Subcommittee earlier in the month, will face the Rulemaking and Regulation Subcommittee on Wednesday. The measure is also expected to be taken up by the Judiciary Committee, the Health Care Appropriations Subcommittee and the Health and Human Services Committee.

The governor’s executive order quickly came under fire. Later on Wednesday, Howard Simon, the executive director of the Florida ACLU, pointed to a 2004 case which, he maintained, found that random drug testing of state workers is unconstitutional.

“I’m not sure why Governor Scott does not know that the policy he recreated by executive order today has already been declared unconstitutional,” said Simon. “The state of Florida cannot force people to surrender their constitutional rights in order to work for the state. Absent any evidence of illegal drug use, or assigned a safety-sensitive job, people have a right to be left alone.”

Simon took aim at Scott, arguing that the executive order was hypocritical coming from Scott, who pledged to fight for a smaller, less intrusive government during the 2010 election cycle.

“Coming from a governor who promised to protect our freedoms by limiting the intrusive reach of government into our personal lives, this massive expansion of government power at the expense of basic rights is stunning and exposes the state to serious future legal liability,” added Simon. “Since we have already succeeded once in overturning this unconstitutional expansion of government power, the ACLU of Florida is willing to represent any state employee or association of state employees who will have their rights infringed upon if the announced policy takes effect.”

Reach Kevin Derby at kderby@sunshinestatenews.com or at (850) 727-0859.


Comments (10)

kamagra apcalis
10:28PM SEP 30TH 2011
cialis meilleur prix http://acheter-tadalafil.info cialis vente libre cialis pas cher cialis online cialis
7:15PM MAR 25TH 2011
I supported Scott because he seemed to be truly interested in rolling back federal over reach inside Florida. He missed a great opportunity by not handing ALL of the stimulus funds back to Mr. Obama. Scott is keeping 700 million dollars in stimulus funds granted under Charlie Crist. Known as Race To The Top funds (really ObamaEd) this program allows for further intrusion by the federal government into the state's education process. Included is a K-12 monitoring of almost every aspect of a student's life known as Longitudinal Data Collection. In addition, national standards including curriculums will be required. While Mr. Scott made great hay by rightfully refusing what he called "ObamaRail" money, he has embraced "ObamaED" money unquestionably. Even Heritage and CATO, supposedly two of his favorite "think tanks" disapprove of Race to the Top.
It is time for Mr. Scott to get serious regarding the federal government's over reach and costs to the State of Florida. More importantly it is time for him to move on from demonizing state workers and using them as a class warfare card for continued "Tea Party" support. Time to move on Governor, there are bigger issues to tackle than belittling your employess in the press everyday.
OldUncleDave
8:12PM MAR 23RD 2011
“I’m not sure why Governor Scott does not know that the policy he recreated by executive order today has already been declared unconstitutional,”

The GOP is following the Dubya Doctrine, which says the Constitution is "just a damn piece of paper."
Dave
6:46PM MAR 23RD 2011
This teabagger movement is beginning to resemble the third reich more and more.These republicans think they're a master race just like the nazi's .All of these inbread idiots want to do is turn us into sheep.Such a shame that we've been dumbed down so much that if the teabaggers have their way anybody that don't believe in jesus will be thrown in prison.The more and more time passes on the less and less I'm proud to be an american.Smartin up people welfare and union labor isn't bankrupting the country it's people like rick scott that embezzled billions from medicare and plead ignorance.This country does nothing to deter white collar crooks from their greedy ways.People aren't smart enough to put two and two together to realize that the state lost pension money to aig and now they don't want to pay back the money they lost.
LDouglas
12:28PM MAR 23RD 2011
In the long run it's probably a good idea to drug test those receiving taxpayer assistance, but I hope what we're going to do as the punishment has been thought out.

For instance, if an otherwise okay mother of three tests positive for say marijuana, what will happen to her children? Will they have to go without assistance? Will they become homeless? Placed in foster care? Will we jail her? If she's in the middle of treatment for a chronic illness will she immediately be cut off? Or how about her children? Will they be cut off routine medical care? Will they then have to rely on the emergency room?
Ann Campbell
10:31AM MAR 23RD 2011
Is this added cost to the taxpayer necessary? Or is this a way of creating more jobs for lab technicians? I would support screening for selected job descriptions but not for everyone.
Repubtallygirl
8:52AM MAR 23RD 2011
Thank you Governor Scott. We have to take drug tests to get a new job..but those living off my tax dollars don't have to?
JohnDoe
1:41PM MAR 23RD 2011
Yeah! Screw the Fourth Amendment!
HerpDerp
4:20PM MAR 23RD 2011
Right. Because it's "reasonable" for companies to regularly drug test employees that work for their money, but "unreasonable" to drug test people to ensure our taxes aren't going to pay for drugs... If you want help, you've got to be willing to help yourself. Spending milk money on drugs is not going to accomplish that.
fernando
9:40AM MAR 25TH 2011
This is astoundingly odd. Out of nowhere mandating urine testing for tens of thousands of state workers
Aren't legislators and their staffs considered state workers and paid with taxpayer funds? Will they be tested?
It just seems so unsanitary, invasive and expensive. Where are all those little cups going to go and who will profit?

Leave a Comment on This Story

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.