Ron Paul: I'll Decide Soon on a Presidential Run

In Tallahassee to promote his new book, 'Liberty Defined'
By: Kevin Derby and Gray Rohrer | Posted: April 21, 2011 7:52 PM
Ron Paul

Ron Paul 4/21/11 | Credit: Gray Rohrer

Saying he will decide in the next month whether to run for the Republican presidential nomination in 2012, U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, spoke to the Tallahassee media Thursday during his visit to the capital to promote his new book, "Liberty Defined: 50 Essential Issues That Affect Our Freedom."

Paul was a Libertarian candidate in 1988. He came in second in 10 GOP primaries and caucuses and placed third in 17 of them in 2008. He said he will consider running and reveal his decision in the next month.

“I don’t have any precise plans,” said Paul, referring to a possible timetable to launch a presidential bid.

He downplayed talk that his son, U.S. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, will run for the Republican nomination, saying the media have blown that out of proportion.

Sunshine State News asked the Texas congressman if the announcement made earlier in the day by former Gov. Gary Johnson of New Mexico, who endorsed Paul in 2008, impacted his plans to seek the Republican nomination. “Probably not,” replied Paul. “It seems like he is making his own decision and I’ll make my own.”

Paul said President Barack Obama is vulnerable in his re-election bid and a disappointment to many of his supporters who were looking to end American involvement overseas. Paul also called out the president on civil rights.

"I think his record in protecting civil liberties has been very poor,” said Paul. “He backed off on how prisoners would be treated in Guantanamo."

Asked if he has any interest in the U.S. Senate seat in Texas currently held by retiring Republican U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, Paul showed little enthusiasm for entering that race. “It’s not going to be one of the things I do in life.”

Paul praised the concept of nullification in which a state can nullify federal laws and he maintains that Thomas Jefferson backed the concept in the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions of 1798. He noted that nullification can be used for states looking to defend medical marijuana laws from the federal government.

“I think (nullification) is a very good idea. I don’t like big, national government.”

The Texas congressman took aim at American foreign policy, arguing that military actions abroad have helped bankrupt the federal government and that the U.S. should end all foreign aid.

“That’s a major reason why we’re bankrupt -- foreign policy out of control,” insists Paul.

Paul also spoke out against embargos with Cuba and Afghanistan. “I believe in free trade. If we trade with people, we won’t fight with them.”

The Texas congressman contrasted himself to other politicians in Washington. “Some people who say they are the biggest free traders are the first to say embargo,” Paul insisted.

“I think if we didn’t have this embargo with Cuba, Fidel Castro wouldn’t be there anymore,” Paul added. “History shows you’re more likely to get rid of a dictator if you undermine his support by trading with him."

Paul also expressed his displeasure with the federal budget proposed by Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis.  “I didn’t vote for it,” Paul noted. “Nothing they have up there would cut spending this year from last year.”

Mulling over the fiscal solutions proposed by his fellow Republicans, Paul insists their solution will do nothing to help reduce the national debt or deficits.

“They haven’t come very close to tackling the problem,” said Paul about congressional Republicans. “It’s not a budget problem, it’s a problem with deciding what the role of government should be.”

He said he has no firm opinions of Democratic U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson, who is running for a third term in 2012, or the field of Republican candidates looking to take him on.

Toward the end of his remarks, Paul talked about the tea party movement and how it is putting new issues -- such as examining the Federal Reserve -- on the table and is looking to join his call for reducing American military involvement overseas.

“These are the kinds of issues that are vital to the tea party people,” said Paul, before heading off to give a speech at Florida State. “I think it is very significant that people are moving in this direction.”

Reach Kevin Derby at and reach Gray Rohrer at or both at (850) 727-0859.

Comments (4)

9:43AM OCT 31ST 2011

program brands, mentioned Jennifer Lu, EMC's chief representative uggs outlet stores China.In China's 12th Five-Year method (2011-2015), the federal government will work to fee up the implementation using the "go global" strategy.China and Europe, facing a uggs clearance sale entire world with drastic financial storms in some regions, will require to uphold the spirit of sailing from exactly the same exact boat, concur to differ, strengthen their ties, uggs outlet stand out as two essential game fanatics in ensuring entire world stability and prosperity.Chinese President Hu Jintao arrived in Vienna Sunday on the four-day connect bailey button [filtered word] sale have a look at to Austria in middle Europe, and will show up at the sixth G20 summit, for getting held from the southern French village of tall ugg boots



4:37AM SEP 29TH 2011

Sometimes people would like to ask you,

chanel shoes

whether there are around each other,

replica Chanel

as a favorite to reach the realm of love,

Chanel boots

obviously not a lover,

chanel 2.55

but have to pay more than pen lover.

chanel bags

clearly not family,

replica Chanel bags

but blood is thicker than rely on each other.

chanel 2.55

obviously not intentionally vindictive ,

replica Chanel handbags

but each secretly care about a lot. As a person,

ugg boots sale

though not a pair couple of people,

Bailey Button Ugg Boots

not gay, but the feeling is good to for her sake,

ugg bailey button

to pay, even as the other half lives depend on.

ugg boots bailey
12:27AM APR 22ND 2011
This article is chock full of blatantly false statements. Whoever wrote this article should be fired. Ron Paul was a REPUBLICAN presidential candidate in 2008, and is likely to be in 2012 as well. Was associating him with the Libertarian Party an attempt to try to portray Ron Paul as a "non-mainstream" candidate? Did this author write this article subjectively rather than objectively? Does the author of this article possibly have their own presidential preference, which is possibly someone other than Paul? I'm just posing questions, not accusing anybody of anything.
1:10AM APR 22ND 2011
Relax, Dave. It's OK. The article stated that Ron Paul was a Libertarian nominee for president in 1988, which he was. It just didn't specify that he ran for president as a Republican in 2008. But then, anyone reading the article ought to know that anyway. And "just posing questions" doesn't mean that you're "not accusing anyone of anything." You clearly are, from the tone of your questions. So please, no trolling, alright?

Leave a Comment on This Story

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.