Politics
Ron Paul Takes on Abortion: 'The Most Important Issue of Our Age'
Making his third presidential bid, Texas congressman wants states to resolve issue
Around the State
Stuck in Washington as Congress faces votes on continued funding of American military action in Libya, U.S. Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, making his third bid for the White House, spoke via Skype to pro-life activists convening in Jacksonville.
“I talk a lot about right-to-life,” said Paul, who called it “the most important issue of our age.”
Paul, who was the Libertarian presidential nominee in 1988 and ran for the Republican presidential nomination in 2008, called abortion “a very bad sign for civilization.
“To give abortion-on-demand is to show there is no respect for life,” Paul told the National Right-to-Life Committee's (NRLC) annual convention.
Paul noted that he has been called a “champion of liberty” due to his call for a reduction in the size and scope of the federal government, his critiques of monetary policy and his attacks on American foreign policy.
“Liberty is secondary to life,” insisted Paul. “If you’re careless about the defense of life, you can’t be a champion of liberty.”
The congressman noted that when he went to medical school in the late 1950s and early 1960s, he never encountered or studied about abortion and grieved to see the practice become legalized and supported in America. He noted that the Hippocratic oath was no longer being administered to new doctors, arguing this is a sign of how accepted abortion has become.
Paul said pro-life advocates would never see an end to legalized abortion until the culture was changed.
“The legalization of abortion has come from a change of morality,” maintained Paul. “We fight abortion at all levels but ultimately it’s the morality of the people that counts.”
The congressman said he believed that the legalization of abortion led to the rise of a number of violent crimes across the United States. including increased incidents of child abuse.
Unlike many pro-lifers who want to see the federal government outlaw abortion, Paul said the best way to fight against it politically would be at the state levels.
“I see abortion as an act of violence so I see it as a state issue,” said Paul. “When we make it a national issue, we get what we’ve had.”
Paul said the Supreme Court of the United States should have never heard Roe v. Wade, the case that legalized abortion, and said that social issues -- including abortion, school prayer and marriage -- should be handled by the states and not by the federal courts.
The congressman pointed to the We the People Act that he has backed, which would take social issues back to the states, and expressed dissatisfaction with Congress for never passing it -- even when conservatives and Republicans controlled the White House and both chambers of Congress.
“We could have stopped millions and millions of abortions,” said Paul. “We should not legalize the killing of an individual.”
Reach Kevin Derby at kderby@sunshinestatenews.com or at (850) 727-0859.
“I talk a lot about right-to-life,” said Paul, who called it “the most important issue of our age.”
Paul, who was the Libertarian presidential nominee in 1988 and ran for the Republican presidential nomination in 2008, called abortion “a very bad sign for civilization.
“To give abortion-on-demand is to show there is no respect for life,” Paul told the National Right-to-Life Committee's (NRLC) annual convention.
Paul noted that he has been called a “champion of liberty” due to his call for a reduction in the size and scope of the federal government, his critiques of monetary policy and his attacks on American foreign policy.
“Liberty is secondary to life,” insisted Paul. “If you’re careless about the defense of life, you can’t be a champion of liberty.”
The congressman noted that when he went to medical school in the late 1950s and early 1960s, he never encountered or studied about abortion and grieved to see the practice become legalized and supported in America. He noted that the Hippocratic oath was no longer being administered to new doctors, arguing this is a sign of how accepted abortion has become.
Paul said pro-life advocates would never see an end to legalized abortion until the culture was changed.
“The legalization of abortion has come from a change of morality,” maintained Paul. “We fight abortion at all levels but ultimately it’s the morality of the people that counts.”
The congressman said he believed that the legalization of abortion led to the rise of a number of violent crimes across the United States. including increased incidents of child abuse.
Unlike many pro-lifers who want to see the federal government outlaw abortion, Paul said the best way to fight against it politically would be at the state levels.
“I see abortion as an act of violence so I see it as a state issue,” said Paul. “When we make it a national issue, we get what we’ve had.”
Paul said the Supreme Court of the United States should have never heard Roe v. Wade, the case that legalized abortion, and said that social issues -- including abortion, school prayer and marriage -- should be handled by the states and not by the federal courts.
The congressman pointed to the We the People Act that he has backed, which would take social issues back to the states, and expressed dissatisfaction with Congress for never passing it -- even when conservatives and Republicans controlled the White House and both chambers of Congress.
“We could have stopped millions and millions of abortions,” said Paul. “We should not legalize the killing of an individual.”
Reach Kevin Derby at kderby@sunshinestatenews.com or at (850) 727-0859.


Comments (26)
He's all for liberty -- FOR MEN. But for women? Oh, no, for women, every uterus is a public utility, and the woman who carries that uterus is a slave of the state, who can -- and according to him, should -- be forced to bear children against her will.
Where's MY liberty, Dr. Paul? Shame on you. Female life matters just as much as fetal life. Stop trying to get your laws in my pants.
shell pearl necklace
gemstone necklace
freshwater pearl bracelet
wholesale pearl bracelet
inflatable
amber strand
wholesale pearl jewelry
biwa freshwater pearl strand
round freshwater pearl strand
coin freshwater pearl strand
When a fetus develops the ability to survive outside to womb without artificial assistance I will consider abortion wrong. It is not anyone's place to tell a woman what she should do with her body. If he is truly pro-life then I want him to denounce meat eating and the killing of all animals, or if equating animal life with human life is beyond your rationale then how do most pro-lifers accept the death penalty. If you truly value life you must value all life not just human life, but i don't hear any body on the pro-life side saying this.
"Cain said to his brother Abel, "Let us go out to the field." and when out in the field, Cain attacked his brother and killed him. Then the lord said to Cain, "Where is your brother Abel?" "I dont know he replied. Am I my brother's keeper? The Lord said "What have you done? Listen, your brother's blood cries out to me from the earth." Genesis 4:8-10
"After Cain committed the first murder in human history, God asked him "Where is your brother?" He replied by saying "I dont know."
In 1973, the Supreme court was asked the same question and gave the same answer. Unable to admit that the unborn children are our brothers and sisters, the Supreme Court said in its Roe V Wade ruling, "We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins." Boil that down to three words, and its "I dont know." From Frank Pavone's Devotional for our "40 Days For Life" prayer vigil. I encourage you to look into it and get involved.
I often wonder if Psalm 94 is speaking specifically to The US Supreme Court's Roe V Wade decision when it says "Shall the throne of iniquity which devises evil by law have fellowship with You? They gather together against the LIFE of the righteous, and condemn innocent blood!" Just a few verses before this the Psalmist uses embryonic terms when he says "Shall He who planted the ear not hear? Shall He who formed the eye not see?" The chapter ends with the sobering words "He has brought upon them their own iniquity and shall cut them off in their own wickedness; the Lord our God shall cut them off!"
Deitrich Boenhoffer, a German Pastor who was executed by the Nazis said; "Silence in the face of evil is evil itself and we will not be held guiltless! Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act."
Get involved in this issue. If you need help or advice in how, feel free to contact me. papakevin11@gmail.com
And when pro-life people complain, the corporation will do what all polluting corporations do- create a lot of doubt that the process actually harms people. (Best case, maybe pay a fine, maybe pay a settlement but never admit liability.)
Sarcasm off, I'll respect Ron Paul's pro-life stance once I know where he stands on regulations concerning the pollution of our air, water, and food. Is he willing to put our health over free market principles in the name of corporate profits and strengthen, or at least enforce with teeth our Clean Air and Clean Water Acts. And reform the FDA, the USDA, and any other government agency charged with protecting our health to make sure they're doing just that.
http://www.amazon.com/Poisoned-Profits-Toxic-Assault-Children/dp/B002T45...
God bless Ron Paul; and the America that we used to know.
In regard to how he feels about polution: he sees it as a property rights issue. Everyone owns the air, water and land- so you can't just go polluting: you're violating other people's rights to maintain a safe environment for themselves. In Paul's mind, abuses, like what you seem to indicate with corporations, come when big government becomes involved. The government calludes with big business, and thats when you see corprations getting away, like you said. If things were at the state level and smaller- it would be less likely that you could just see continued abuses like that.
and economic issues, abortion being one. With the help of Dr. Ron Paul and the late, great Harry
Browne, I was able to change my long held thinking pattern on the topic and adopt the view against
federal intervention of any kind.
Government should neither promote or discourage abortion. Taxpayers should never be forced to fund
either abortions, faith based counseling, abstinence programs, adoption services or Planned Parenthood
ideology. The matter should reside at the state level.
I also firmly assert that Dr. Paul is an example of someone who most lives up to the cherished ideal
associated with term "pro-life". This is due to his consistent political and social views regarding war, the
use of force and individual autonomy. Most others who claim to be crusaders on behalf of the unborn
are merely pro-birth.
I differ with the good Doctor on theocratic grounds however and with the premise that life begins at the
moment of conception. Most theists conveniently omit or are unaware that almost 50% of pregnancies
where the woman is unaware that she has conceived, ends in spontaneous abortion. When a woman is
aware of her pregnancy, this heavenly induced process takes place about 20% of the time. To the self-
righteous, God it seems is the one abortion doctor who is beyond reproach and exempt from moral
scrutiny.
Government should neither promote or discourage abortion. Taxpayers should never be forced to fund either abortions, faith based counseling, abstinence programs, adoption services or Planned Parenthood ideology. The matter should reside at the state level.
I also firmly assert that Dr. Paul is an example of someone who most lives up to the cherished ideal associated with term "pro-life". This is due to his consistent political and social views regarding war, the use of force and individual autonomy. Most others who claim to be crusaders on behalf of the unborn are merely pro-birth.
I differ with the good Doctor on theocratic grounds however and with the premise that life begins at the moment of conception. Most theists conveniently omit or are unaware that almost 50% of pregnancies where the woman is unaware that she has conceived, ends in spontaneous abortion. When a woman is aware of her pregnancy, this heavenly induced process takes place about 20% of the time. To the self-righteous, God it seems is the one abortion doctor who is beyond reproach and exempt from moral scrutiny.
I am constantly amazed at how reflexively and thoughtlessly, believers give the god concept the ultimate benefit of the doubt. God is freely granted by the holder of faith, the win-win, no matter the reason, circumstance or outcome. Because it is one’s god performing the deed or procedure, the result is always sacrosanct, never to be scorned or criticized. Make all circumstances identical but place the same results in the hands of a mere mortal and the exact outcome suddenly becomes suspect at best and outright evil at worst.
A perfect example of this is the act of male mutilation known as circumcision. Only a decree from on high could make such a ritualistic act of barbarism not only mainstream but sanctified. If a human were to devise such a hideously cruel and irrational scheme they would be viewed as a criminal. Incidentally, all carefully crafted, secular based reasons for circumcision, including the deceitfully motivated, personal hygiene angle have been debunked by science.
I am willing to sincerely admit that the abortion question and any subsequent answers are difficult and not easily arrived at. What I will not concede is being an advocate of government force to promote either side’s solution.
Leave a Comment on This Story