Government

Rick Scott -- and Rail Ally -- Could Save Bullet Train

By: Keith Laing The News Service of Florida | Posted: December 14, 2010 4:05 AM
Paula Dockery

A supporter of Gov.-elect Rick Scott, who is so on the outs with legislative leaders that speculation has mounted she might end up in his administration, may hold the key to the future of a high-speed rail connecting Tampa and Orlando.

State Sen. Paula Dockery, R-Lakeland, who has been rewarded for her brief anti-Tallahassee gubernatorial run with diminished power in the Florida Senate, said on a statewide political show this weekend that it is up to her and other rail supporters to convince Scott to get on board with the long-sought train that the federal government has basically committed to paying for.

“I think we have an obligation to prove to him that this is not going to be a drain on taxpayers, that it is going to create jobs, that private industry is going to assume the risk, that there’s not going to be subsidies and ongoing maintenance,” Dockery said Sunday on the Political Connections show on Bay News 9 in Tampa. “This will not be a drain on the state, nor will it be a public transportation system. It’s going to be a true public-private partnership.”

Few rail supporters may have the inside track with Scott as much as Dockery. She endorsed Scott shortly after she ended her own bid for the Republican gubernatorial nomination and was considered a possible contender to be his running mate. Dockery’s name has since come up most frequently as a possible transportation secretary.

Dockery opposed the SunRail commuter train in Orlando, but she has vocally supported the long-sought bullet train along the I-4 corridor between Orlando and Tampa, which was largely the brainchild of her husband, C.C. Dockery. The Lakeland businessman, once chairman of the disbanded Florida High-Speed Rail Authority, pushed for the train in the late 1990s and early 2000s.

Dockery said she would consider agreeing to run the transportation department or the Department of Environmental Protection, if Scott offered.

“I would consider it,” she said. “All options are on the table … but that’s certainly not something I’m working on.”

Dockery, who was one of the few ruling Republicans not awarded a committee chairmanship for next year, was quick to note the similarities between her abbreviated campaign themes and Scott’s victorious bid, which could come in handy when the time comes to bend the governor-elect’s ear about the rail project.

“Independence in the political process is not often rewarded,” she said. “I have been known over the past several years to speak my mind very freely. During my brief run for governor, I was very critical of the way things were done in Tallahassee … and I don’t think that message went over very well. Ironically, that was also the message of Rick Scott, who is our governor-elect, but there is not much that can happen to him as governor-elect.”

Turning Scott around on the high-speed rail project may not be easy. Florida received the latest award for the train, $342 million, only because newly-elected Republican governors in states like Wisconsin and Ohio said after the November elections that they did not want to build rail projects in their states. Scott has signaled he is not sure he does, either.

U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood notified those states that the rail money did not have to be used, but it could not be reallocated to other areas in the cash-strapped states' budgets, even transportation projects like roads and highways. Presumably, the same rules would apply to Florida.

Rail supporters took some hope because Scott was not as definitive as his counterparts in Wisconsin and Ohio, but he did not exactly jump at the federal windfall, despite the fact that it brought the state’s haul close to the full $2.6 billion cost.


Comments (4)

Richarfd Riker
9:55AM DEC 14TH 2010
Where do the supporters of Sun Rail think the money the government is being so generous with comes from? If they're not sure let me remind them it comes from us, the taxpayers. Don't try to sell this boondoggle or the money for it as a freebee for Florida. This transportation project would benefit only a small amount of people at a huge cost. Only two lines in the entire world have recovered their capital cost and every line still requires massive ongoing subsidies year after year after year. You might not like this fact but a fact is a fact, so, how can anyone make a the case that it will cost the Florida taxpayer nothing or that it will benefit the entire state. Intellectually and factually there is no justification for Sun Rail. Finally, how dare those we elect to office work directly in opposition to what the people of Florida who have voted NO to Sun Rail twice in the past few years. This amounts to nothing less that an elitist slap in the face to each citizen of Florida.
J.Hu
4:46PM DEC 15TH 2010
If your only beef is the money is coming from taxes, you are being very short-sighted. If Florida doesn't used the money to build and rail and jobs, then some other forward-thinking state will. The money will be spent. We might as well get with the program and use it to our benefit.
Cesar M. Gonzalez
8:20PM FEB 17TH 2011
I agree.....Not only should we use the high speed rail money to our advantage here in Florida, but many people fail to realize how many millions of tourists who come to Florida would use this train from the cruise ships at Port Everglades, and up to Disney World, once the line is extended south...
People from Europe and South America are very accustomed to mass transportation......Shortsighted people fail to see gasoline prices of six to ten dollars per gallon in the next decade or less.....You can bet on it....
Let's not wait until we have the noose around our neck....Build the train.....
Dwayne Thornton
11:11AM DEC 14TH 2010
There is a reason virtually every business leader in the area is a vocal supporter of high speed rail -- they understand the vision for it: to bring much needed jobs and intellectual capital to the region. This project benefits the state in ways many people don't understand, but the financial benefits to the state will be significant and long-lasting. When evaluating an investment, even one that is not almost fully paid for by someone else, vision for the future is an important, and often overlooked, aspect of making a wise decision.

We can ignore the future benefits of high speed rail and fall farther behind other states such as NC and CO, who have supported rail systems in their states, in attracting top business talent and investment to the region. Make no mistake, if Rick Scott does not support high speed rail, it will be at the long-term detriment to the state, though he may perceive it in his short term interest. Note: Rick Scott's history at CEO suggests his interest is the maximize short-term profits, while his his company (HCA) committed massive fraud against the U.S. federal government to pad profits. Thus, it is certainly not a sure thing that he cares to consider the wisdom of a long-term investment for the state of Florida. I do hope he takes his oath of office as governor in different light than he did his obligation as CEO.