Sen. Alan Hays, Tell 'Em Back Home It Was You, You, You Who Killed 'Parent Trigger'

By: Nancy Smith | Posted: March 23, 2012 3:55 AM
I Beg to Differ
Nobody kept Alan Hays from voting for the "parent trigger" bill except Alan Hays. Pay no attention to the excuses.

The bill designed to empower parents to take action on failing schools didn't fail because of Senate President Mike Haridopolos. It didn't fail because of workers' comp legislation. And it didn't fail because of some philosophical change of heart somewhere down the line. It failed because a co-sponsor of the "parent trigger" bill -- Sen. Alan Hays, R-Umatilla -- didn't vote for it.

It's that simple.

Alan Hays

Sen. Alan Hays, R-Umatilla | Credit: Mark Foley -

The senator who signed on to co-sponsor one of his party's highest priorities in the end snuffed it out like a switchman's lantern.

Why would he do that? I can't figure the man out.

Call me naive. I think the problem is, I haven't been around the Capitol long enough to accept what one longtime mainstream reporter describes as "how things are done up here." I understand ambition and power and political alliance. I understand trading votes on bills and how it all works into the fine art of compromise.

What I don't, what I can't understand is why any legislator -- in this case, Alan Hays -- would sign on to sponsor a bill -- actually give his word to usher it through -- if he couldn't commit to it?

I could imagine a bill sponsor reversing his vote to save face with the home folks -- if the bill was already a winner without him on board. Or, if the bill he's sponsoring wound up so festooned with crazy amendments, he doesn't recognize it anymore. Or, if new information came to light along the way, to show him the bill really isn't right for the people of Florida.

But none of the above was the case with Sen. Alan Hays.

In the waning hours of the regular session on March 9, when Hays cast his vote against what is properly called the Parent Empowerment Act, in his eyes and in his heart and in his mind -- it was payback time. Time to do unto Haridopolos what Haridopolos had done unto him.

The Senate president had kept another of his bills, SB 668, workers' compensation, from reaching the Senate floor. Hays took the position that he would vote against the Haridopolos-favorite "parent trigger" if workers' compensation was not allowed to advance -- and it was not.

"The president, who said he wasn't going to help or hinder the (workers' compensation) bill when it got to budget, refused to release it," Hays told Sunshine State News.

Hays cast the swing "no" vote on the "parent trigger" bill and he knew it. It left the vote count at 20-20, dashing the hopes of parents who sought to restructure their children's bad schools into good ones and breaking a promise not only to his party, but to his largely rural, conservative, charter-school-supportive constituency that favored the bill.

Hays was sponsoring the two bills -- the "parent trigger" and SB 668, a controversial workers' comp bill that would have kept dispensing physicians from "overcharging" for repackaged drugs and forcing a higher-than-necessary insurance rate increase.

And while it's true, Haridopolos disappointed Hays, in the end, what does it matter? The workers' comp bill was not coming to the floor for a vote and the "parent trigger" was. One bill Hays was sponsoring was dead anyway, the other was alive -- and could stay alive, become law, with this sponsor's "yes" vote.

What sense does it make to retaliate against a bill you don't philosophically oppose, you know needs your vote to survive and is a fan favorite back home?

The "trigger" bill, the Parent Empowerment Act, would have allowed parents to seek wide-ranging changes at low-performing schools, including turning a traditional neighborhood school into a charter and giving parents an alternative to sending their children to F-graded schools.

Proponents of "parent trigger" laws throughout the country say that they empower parents to provide their children with the best opportunity for a good education. Often, they say, these parents lack the means to provide other options, such as a better public school or a private school for their kids.

California was the first state to pass a parent trigger law, in January 2010. The primary force behind its passing was Parent Revolution, which, according to its website, makes this promise to parents: "Organize half the parents at your children's failing school to demand change, and we will stand with you and empower you to fight for the great school your children deserve."

Primary sponsor of the Florida bill was Sen. Lizbeth Benacquisto, R-Fort Myers, who told her colleagues that the law was needed to make sure that "every one of our schools is as great as the schools where your grandchildren go ... where your children go." She added, "We shouldn't rest until every school is at that level."

Alan Hays committed to join Benacquisto as sponsor. Instead, he killed the bill.

I guess at this point, I just want him to take responsibility. I want him to admit he let ego obstruct duty.

It seems to me we should be able to expect all of the people we elect to public office to keep their promises to the people, or have a darn good reason why not. Hays' reason for breaking his is political hocus pocus, nothing more.

Reach Nancy Smith at, or at (850) 727-0859.


Comments (8)

3:15PM MAR 24TH 2012
NANCY - You owe Susan Bucher a personal apology for your March 20th article entitled "How Many More Susan Bucher Sci-Fi Thrillers Can Palm Beach County Tolerate?". Dominion Voting Services has admitted that the Wellington vote problem WAS a sofware problem, not the Elections Supervisor's fault as you claimed --> "This Wellington incident should spell the end of the road for Susan Bucher. It really should." Shehad procedures in place to catch the problem, but you were quick to condemn. Apologize (and how about doing an equal length Sunshine State News article admitting your rush to judgement and error, along with a sincere, not half-hearted apology).
palm beach paula
12:35AM MAR 25TH 2012
Ihope nancy will NOT apologize to this dreadful "public servant." If susan was right it's the 1st time. besides she should NOT have certified the results before all checks were made. Keep your eye on her sunshine news and good luck to bucher's opponent in the election.
Roseanne Eckert
5:58PM MAR 23RD 2012
I am an educated parent who has a child in public school in Florida. I am grateful that Sen. Hays did not vote for the Parent Trigger Bill, more aptly described as the corporate welfare bill. I don't know any parent groups who wanted this bill. I really don't care why Sen. Hays did what he did--I am just grateful.
Were you out of the country?
4:29PM MAR 23RD 2012
While Hays fed into the negative image of a politician, his vote was rejoiced by the vast majority of parents interested in the ssue. Was the writer out of the country or unaware that 330,000 PTA moms and many grassroot networks of Florida moms activated to fight this ridiculous and unnecessary bill? Exactly where were the supprorting Moms? I saw a SF staffer..that's one. I recall parent groups from all ove rthe state running to the media to say they didn't support it.Rhee and Jeb were defeated. Senate Bill 6 was the first victory. The parent trigger marks the second. Perhaps Jeb and Rhee could try sellingTupperware!!
David K.
9:23AM MAR 23RD 2012
Nancy, I hope you give the same attention to the 400 plus appointments that were not confirmed by the Senate. There is no doubt in my mind that appointments, especially early appointments will be eliminated. Those who did not "deliver" the votes will find their recommendations removed and replaced by other friendly "horse traders."

My guess is you will let this form of bribery slide rather than expose it. Not confirming those appointments was not a matter of time. It was planned by the Senate president and his former chief of staff.
1:46PM MAR 23RD 2012
I saw a story about those appointments on here. Haridopolos chalked it up to running out of time. I remember that article because it struck me that it's easy to run out of time when you waste so much of it on yourself. I believe you have to have a huge ego to serve in the capitol. At the end it's all about egos and never about floridians. Very sad.
Phil Leary
8:14AM MAR 23RD 2012
Nancy, you have it wrong! Having lobbied for over 20 years, I see Sen. Hays no vote on the "parent trigger" bill as a message to current and future presiding officers and leadership to keep your word. To business and industry the "workers comp" bill was as important to them as the "parent trigger bill was to it's supporters. I admire Sen. Hays conviction and tell you he is, in my opinion, the most honorable and honest member of the Florida Senate. Wish there were 39 more just like him!
9:25AM MAR 23RD 2012
Don't agree with you, Phil Leary. Personally, I am a Republican who opposed the parent trigger but reading this posting I think somebody has come along and seen how dysfunctional we are up here. Hays was a water carrier absorbed in the process and forgot all about why he was elected. I don't excuse Hari. Nevertheless Hays let a lot of people down far beyond Tallahassee and the legislature.

Leave a Comment on This Story

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.