Government

Sen. Mike Bennett Caught Looking at Porn on Senate Floor

By: Lane Wright | Posted: May 3, 2010 2:41 PM

 

Sorry, you need to install flash to see this content.

Sen. Mike Bennett caught viewing a pornographic image during session. Claims it was an unexpected email from trusted source

No one will argue that sitting on the Senate floor during session can get a little boring, but looking at porn is probably not the best way to pass the time.

On Thursday morning, Sunshine State News captured exclusive video of Sen. Mike Bennett, R-Bradenton, looking at pornographic material on his state-issued computer on the Senate floor.

Ironically, as Bennett is viewing the material, you can hear a Senator Dan Gelber's voice in the background debating a controversial abortion bill.

"I'm against this bill," said Gelber, "because it disrespects too many women in the state of Florida."

Bennett defended his actions, telling Sunshine State News it was an email sent to him by a woman "who happens to be a former court administrator."

"I was just sitting there, bored as they were debating the abortion bill," Bennett said.

"I opened it up and said holy [expletive]! What's on my screen? and clicked away from it right away."

Sunshine State News could not verify how long the image of four bikini-clad women with their tops exposed was open before our cameras started rolling on it, but it was up for at least three seconds before it disappeared from the screen.

Senate spokesperson Jaryn Emhof explained further on Bennett's behalf.

"There was some confusion about an email he received," said Emhof. "He thought it was an email about an item being debated on the Senate floor. As soon as he realized it wasn't he closed the page."

But the one image we caught on camera wasn't the only thing Bennett had viewed. It appears other files, including at least two videos, may have been downloaded, too. He was also caught on camera watching a video of a dog running out of the water and shaking itself off. It is unclear if he also thought that was an email about a bill being debated on the floor.

We offered Bennett an opportunity to prove his statements to Sunshine State News by showing the executive editor and videographer the email record with a government-related subject line, but after talking to the Senate's top lawyer, he declined to let us see those records.

This revealing video comes just weeks after an investigation found a number of federal Securities and Exchange Commission employees had been spending several hours visiting pornographic websites on government-issued computers when they should have been working.

When asked if he ever looks at pornography while on the Senate floor, Bennett responded, "You'd have to be insane to do that. It all goes through a server. I don't think anybody would be doing that."


Comments (197)

Doug
10:42AM MAY 5TH 2010
Hmmmm, excellent point, and what am I doing reading about this at work?!!! ahahahahah...

The Senator was in the wrong, BUT, why was Sunshine news filming what someone was looking at and doing on their computer?!
Tammy W.
11:06PM MAY 5TH 2010
Maybe because they knew what would show up on his screen before he did. Just a theory.
Tammy W.
11:05PM MAY 5TH 2010
Maybe they knew what was going to pop up on his screen before he did. ? Just a thought.
Truly of the Yard
7:57PM MAY 4TH 2010
Whether or not the image is pornographic -- if the subjects did or didn't have a little strip of fabric in this place or that -- doesn't matter one bit!

The general subject that this holier-than-thou hypocrite is spending his time on is completely inappropriate for the Senate floor. I couldn't care less what he views on his personal machine in his own time, but looking at bikini girls in the chamber during a debate means he has no respect for the setting, for his colleagues or for his constituents.

While I won't blame him for finding part of his job boring, I do blame him for not being mature enough to handle it.
libertyanne
2:33PM MAY 5TH 2010
I don't know anything about this guy. Sounds like human diversion to me. If he's a sane little elephant I would cut him slack but if he's a TParty Hypocrite he deservs to be hassled--but not fired. We all need to lighten up and yes, he should have owned up to it like a man.
Tromp
9:04PM MAY 4TH 2010
I whole heartily agree with your opinion
Dan
7:02PM MAY 4TH 2010
LOL... laughing at his "explanation" of how he ended up looking at it. C'mon horndog, you were looking for it... it's OK to admit you're half-assing it sometimes....
John Smith
6:17PM MAY 4TH 2010
Seriously, is everyone here going to say that they have never EVER opened a pic, video, thinking it was ok and it turned out to be pornographic or at least nsfw?????? the guy was bored, was reading his personal email and opened a pic of some nude chicks ...get over it. nothing to see here
whoknu
6:31PM MAY 4TH 2010
Not everyone is a United States Senator who gets paid by taxpayers. Do you?
Jeff Charles
2:02PM MAY 4TH 2010
The photo is from a site called "Bikini Dare"
Jeff Temos
11:03PM MAY 4TH 2010
No it was from insanelandingpages.com
Martin
1:51PM MAY 4TH 2010
Hi,

It goes against any emotional bone in my body, but i have to vigorously defend a politician.

* First: He has not been caught watching any porn. What he watches does not even approach event the most bigoted defintion of porn. If that should be porn, than i would have spent several vacations in a porn camp even without noticing.

* Second: For doing something else during a boring speech, he has my complete understanding. This makes him do his job neither better nor worse. The speeches are no longer part of the political process. It is more important for a politician (in order to get elected) to kiss some babys or his contributors a**es than to give eloquent speeches in parliament. The voters are even more desinterested in those speeches than the politicians.

By using the headline, the Sunshine News is conducting a witch hunt. Even on this site i suspect several readers not to look at the material and to remember just the headlines. I hereby petition to change the headline to "State Senator falsely accused of Looking At Porn On Senate Floor".

CU, Martin
as
11:56AM MAY 5TH 2010
I disagree with your defense of the Senator.

1. Abortion is a hugely hot-button topic for either the Dems or the GOP.
Not only is it unprofessional for him to not be paying attention to something that the public considers extremely important in the matters of privacy, health and rights but it shows a great example of how and why our elected officials get nothing done.

2. What is wrong for one should be wrong for everyone. Fair rules.
Employees of any other company are not allowed to peruse personal emails at work. Websites with games, social networking, chatting, IMs, potentially offensive content, and other such are blocked by company firewalls. They do this to try to decrease distractions and increase productivity at work. The same should hold true for our elected officials. If he didn't have access to these distractions, perhaps he too, could be more productive.

While the news is making mountains out of molehills, touting bikinis as porn, they have a good point. He was caught wasting time, not paying attention when he should have been doing his job. It doesn't matter if he was looking at pictures of sandwiches and ice cream. That's not the topic on the floor at the time.

-a
thumpr1019
4:45PM MAY 5TH 2010
You are correct in that abortion is a hugely hot-button topic for either party. That being said, I don't thnk anything said in that meeting is going to change anyone's mind on the topic. People have very strong feelings on the subject, and no one session is going to change anyone's mind.

And the headline should have been that he wasn't paying attention during this session; not that he was looking at "porn". It seem that they kinda missed the point.
tommo
5:15PM MAY 4TH 2010
Only a Repug could advance such a stupid defense, of course, of another Repug.

What if Obama had been caught with those pics. Would you be defending him? Course not, maroon.
Steve
11:11AM MAY 5TH 2010
I can't stand Obama, but since he does plenty of s@*t that I hate much more than emails he reads....I would defend him for this...just like I defended the senile Biden for telling Obama the passage of healthcare was a big f'ing deal. If you stand behind anyone with a camera long enough...you're going to catch them doing something that others might consider questionable. The fact that he only had the image up for 3 or 4 seconds shows he has more self control than most men! Get off your highhorse jack*#s!!
Jeff Rosen
9:14PM MAY 4TH 2010
That response just proves that liberalism is a mental disorder.
Anon
8:34PM MAY 4TH 2010
Wow. This is the state of political debate among the plebs of the new world?
1. Person A advances a sensible assessment of the facts of the matter and critique of the media's interpretation and presentation of events.
2. A vitriolic attack on person A by person B with no founding in reality, and no counter-argument other than a straw-man.

I'm not a US-ian, and both of your major political parties are too far right of centre for me to support...but I have to side with Person A, for the simple reason that he makes sense, and didn't resort to baby-ish name-calling.
Lenny
1:46PM MAY 4TH 2010
Apparently Republicans are into bestiality too!
Anon
1:30PM MAY 4TH 2010
For those arguing that the women are wearing bikinis, I've seen an original version of the image. There are holes in both the tops and bottoms that expose their nipples and labias. If anything, there should be a black bar across their bottoms, too, but the video quality is low enough that you can't tell. Ironic that the black bar actually makes the image look less pornographic than it actually is.
Anon
8:24PM MAY 4TH 2010
Labia is the plural of labium.
Femina
11:56PM MAY 4TH 2010
Hey, Latin Lover!
It's always fun to find another catholic school survivor.
Semper ubi sub ubi ubique !
Anon
6:05AM MAY 5TH 2010
I'm a lover of Latin and I'm neither Catholic nor went to a Catholic school. That's a silly assumption to make. . .
mark
8:19AM MAY 6TH 2010
You also have no sense of humour. LIghten up, clown.
Anon
1:20PM MAY 4TH 2010
Sensationalistic story about a bikini picture and this paper doesn't even use the words "porn", "women" and "dog" together in the headline. Disappointing on so many levels.
Shawn Rickman
10:09AM MAY 4TH 2010
** UNFAIRLY CENSORED **
Why on earth would you black bar out the girls bikini tops???

This is clearly a manipulated situation. How biased is this rag?

If this publication thinks this is porn then I suggest you stay inside a dark closet and never go out side. You would see worse things at the local Stop n' Rob.

Get a life.
Gene
2:31PM MAY 4TH 2010
Since this story broke, I've seen the original picture. It is clearly pornographic: all four are wearing bikinis, yes, but the tops are designed not to cover the nipples, and the bottoms are crotchless, with the genitals showing. The censoring on the video makes it appear that they are wearing normal bikinis (although now knowing the original material, those dark spots on the short girl are actually nipples that the bar missed) and the video is simply too low quality to show the bottoms (which otherwise would require censoring.)
elpinche
2:02PM MAY 4TH 2010
Shawn, well at least it wasn't naked little boys. You know Republicans.
Kelby
2:18PM MAY 4TH 2010
Little naked boys grow up to be Democrats. One begets the other.
Chris M.
4:12PM MAY 4TH 2010
Congratulations. For the dumbest post here yet. Kudos.
elpinche
2:41PM MAY 4TH 2010
Huh?
Luke Thomas
12:05PM MAY 4TH 2010
The Republican dominated Florida law makers obviously have no problem with bestiality. For two years in a row they denied making bestiality a crime. Now I know I live in the deep south - they approve of Floridians screwing animals as testified by not passing this bill.
Ken
12:04PM MAY 4TH 2010
Look, at least one girl has bare breasts, at least another with a visible top. It's obvious the senator knew this image would come up, (he has his screen tilted forward in a more private viewing angle, then tilts it back). There's no telling how long he had looked at the image before the camera started rolling on it, (but 4 seconds on camera is an appreciative gaze); he may have even viewed it previously outside of the chamber floor.

Truth is: a message sent from a "trusted colleague" to a private or public email account, on state-owned computer, displayed in a public place, should be subject to public scrutiny. If the senator has nothing to hide, why doesn't he comply with opportunity to demonstrate his innocence?
Frank
4:42PM MAY 4TH 2010
I've tilted my monitor before while in a public place while checking email. Not because I knew what an email would contain, but rather precisely because I didn't.
Ken
9:57AM MAY 5TH 2010
Yes, but he didn't leave it tilted when opened the (unknown?) email/download of the dog shaking off water from the surf. I still contend he knew what he was doing, and has other information to hide on that computer or he would have demonstrated to the media his innocence. The message remains: if you must look at nudie photos, do so on your own time, in your own home.
Gero
3:26AM MAY 4TH 2010
Look Folks, this is a bikini photo, not porn. It appears only quickly on the screen, then the senator closes it immediately. The film is very manipulative because it shows the same moment twice (wider shot and close-up) so you get the impression the senator is looking at the image again, what was not the case. This is nothing!!
Gene
2:32PM MAY 4TH 2010
Since this story broke, I've seen the original picture. It is clearly pornographic: all four are wearing bikinis, yes, but the tops are designed not to cover the nipples, and the bottoms are crotchless, with the genitals showing. The censoring on the video makes it appear that they are wearing normal bikinis (although now knowing the original material, those dark spots on the short girl are actually nipples that the bar missed) and the video is simply too low quality to show the bottoms (which otherwise would require censoring.)
No Mikey in Congress
8:22AM MAY 4TH 2010
Fact is, he was doing on the publics property. I would lose my job if I looked at anything close to this from my work computer.
luda
4:30AM MAY 4TH 2010
Look kind sir. I am an expert in porn, and that picture was of four exotic models.
Family values
11:14PM MAY 3RD 2010
Taking a poll: How many folks here defending this Republican's Porn-on-the-Senate-Floor viewing are conservatives? Since when did y'all incorporate bare tits porno into the "family values?" I must have missed the memo.
Mathias
4:13PM MAY 4TH 2010
I'm a bleeding heart liberal, and I defend him.
1. Where exactly is the porn?
2. Give me your work email address, and I can make you look at porn.
I don't think the image is worth discussing at all. I'm wondering whether he, or his Republican and Democratic colleagues, should be using a laptop.
elpinche
2:07PM MAY 4TH 2010
It doesn't matter if he was looking at snuff porn with bestiality and pedophilia (with Bennett wearing an American flag around his head in the video) .

It's OK if you're a Republican.
Mike
8:20PM MAY 4TH 2010
UR lame.
Shawn Rickman
10:12AM MAY 4TH 2010
You Sir, are clearly blind. They are NOT bare tits as you would say.
Werecat
10:58PM MAY 3RD 2010
Last few seconds of audio: "I'm against this measure because it disrespects too many women..." How ironic. I wonder what bill they were debating.
seriously?
6:45PM MAY 4TH 2010
The bill was regarding abortion. Wouldn't have to wonder if you read the article instead of just looking at the pretty pictures/video.
Karl B
10:25PM MAY 3RD 2010
Nice timing by the camera guys to be watching him. Doesnt that seem fishy to anyone? Set-up?
You've got to be kidding
10:42PM MAY 3RD 2010
Sure Karl - they forced the him to open porn on floor of senate. I see a gun pointed the politician, he had no choice.

The press gallery is right behind him. you don't have to be a genius to point you camera down.

Look at how he pushes the laptop screen back after he's done catching a shot of the girls, sure it's a set up......not. I'm sure he'd viewed it several times earlier and got caught going back to catch a little refresher peek. The pervert's probably home tonight looking at them over again and again.
vdek
12:12PM MAY 4TH 2010
What if he was reading his email and someone sent him a link an email?

Is that out of line?
steve
10:03PM MAY 3RD 2010
That ain't porn, this article is bull[filtered word].

Leave a Comment on This Story

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.