Politics

Supreme Court Justices Want Their Depositions Delayed

By: Jim Turner | Posted: July 19, 2012 1:00 PM
Peggy Quince, Fred Lewis and Barbara Pariente

Florida Supreme Court Justices Peggy Quince, Fred Lewis and Barbara Pariente | Credit: floridasupremecourt.org

Three Florida Supreme Court justices, facing a lawsuit that claims they violated state law by using court employees for election paperwork, don’t want to give depositions.

Barbara Pariente, Peggy Quince and R. Fred Lewis have filed a motion asking a Leon County judge to block the discovery phase from starting until their motion can be heard to dismiss the lawsuit. The suit seeks to prohibit Secretary of State Ken Detzner from placing the justices on the November ballot.

And they added that testimony should also be held up for the 19 other law clerks, judicial assistants and others that the conservative Southeastern Legal Foundation has sought to depose.

“The court should enter a protective order staying discovery until the court rules on the justices’ motion to dismiss,” wrote counsel for the justices -- John DeVault III, Henry Coxe III, Michael Lockamy.

The Atlanta-based foundation, in a lawsuit on behalf of Florida residents Bernard Long and Veronico L. “Ron” Flores, claims the justices violated state law by using court employees to prepare the campaign documents needed to qualify for the merit retention election on the November ballot.

The justices argued the depositions should be blocked because the foundation filed to have the testimony taken nine days after the lawsuit was filed on June 27, before the justices were able to respond to the initial complaint.

The justices added that they have since responded -- claiming the plaintiffs don’t have standing and that the circuit court doesn’t have jurisdiction. And, they say the initial motions should be heard before the discovery phase begins.  

Two weeks ago, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, concluding an investigation without uncovering any violations, called the use of a court employee a common practice.

The FDLE investigation was spurred by state Rep. Scott Plakon, R-Longwood, and forwarded by Scott.

Scott released a terse statement after the FDLE findings were released, noting that the case remained in the courts “where a determination will be made as to whether this ‘common practice’ is legal.”

If anything, the lawsuit, FDLE probe and actions by Orlando-based Restore Justice2012 have helped the legal community to come together to raise nearly $1 million for the justices' retention efforts.



Reach Jim Turner at jturner@sunshinestatenews.com or at (772) 215-9889.




Comments (5)

anthony famalette
2:12PM OCT 14TH 2012
mitt romney would be the best omaba has a O job gain since in office has never run any kind of business,we do not need moore education now we need jobs we have so many people with degrees that can not find work, obama has no plan,never has had a real job, and both he and his wife were disbared ,real good guy not with my money
Roger Martin
11:17PM JUL 21ST 2012
Removing these individuals from office would save the taxpayer a great deal of money in the long run not to mention halt their dis-service to justice to the citizens of Florida.
Frank
10:47AM JUL 24TH 2012
Won't happen, no matter how much you fanasize in your NeverNeverLand far-right-wing demonizing dreams.

Even at a partisan, widely-cited Republican leaders forum intent upon voting against them, they still got 25% - 35% of the Republican votes for retention. How do you think that'll go in the general election when the majority of voters can vote - think you'll get 25-35% of Democratic and Independent votes?
RepublicanConscience
6:20PM JUL 19TH 2012
Justice delayed, is justice denied. Release the depositions, they are not subject to change, they are written in stone.
Frank
9:30PM JUL 19TH 2012
I guess you need remedial reading 101.

First, the justices' depositions have not been taken yet. Discovery hasn't started yet, during which depositions would happen.

The judges have some preliminary motions they'd like to have heard first that might knock this out of court (e.g. summary judgement).

Second, from what I can see from a distance about the arguments being made, they could happen for several reasons.

Go back and reread the article. Realize, FDLE has already looked at this for the Governor, and as the article indicates, found no violations.

What don't you understand about "no violations"?

Yes, I hope this does speedily come to justice decided, justice implemented . . . . I'm sure the Southeastern Legal Foundation, Bernard Long and Veronico L. “Ron” Flores will just love paying all them summary judgement losing legal fees (if the court allows).

Leave a Comment on This Story

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.