Tallahassee Taxpayers Get Little Back from Red-Light Camera Deal

By: William Patrick FloridaWatchdog.org | Posted: December 18, 2013 3:55 AM
Red light traffic camera

Red-light cameras are supposed to make dangerous intersections safer. But at what cost?

Recent data from the city of Tallahassee show that in both human and financial terms, red light cameras are costing residents of Florida’s capital city much more than they may realize.

But don’t count on hearing that side of the story at this week’s Red Light Camera Safety Program review at City Hall.

A recent press release touts the program’s “decreases in injuries and violations,” suggesting the city’s own program is a success.

A close look at the numbers, however, shows something far less compelling.

In the three years since red-light cameras began flashing fines at the city’s seven busiest intersections -- aimed at ticketing in 19 different driving directions -- there have been only eight fewer side-impact collisions compared to the previous three years without the cameras.

Side-impacts, or right-angle collisions, can be severe. But the decrease, on average less than three per year, shows a loose correlation at best to the program’s professed benefits. In the same period, 53,140 tickets were issued.

Rear-end accidents actually increased by 56 percent during the period, from 231 before the cameras were installed to 360 accidents after the cameras went online in August 2010.

Read more at Tallahassee Reports.

Allen Secreast, Tallahassee’s traffic mobility manager, attributed the sizable uptick in rear-end collisions to “distracted driving.” But that flies in the face of numerous studies cited by the nonprofit motorist watchdog, National Motorist Association.

“The preponderance of independent research (in other words, research that was not funded by ticket camera vendors or units of government interested in justifying camera-based traffic enforcement) has illustrated that ticket cameras typically increase, not decrease, the number of accidents at controlled intersections,” states NMA.

“Red light cameras are all about generating revenue, period,” John Bowman, communications director for NMA, previously told Watchdog.org.

Claims of safety, he said, often are “wishful thinking on the part of red-light camera companies and the part of public officials who support the use of cameras.”

Tallahassee collected $6.3 million in red-light camera fines through the three-year program. But only about 20 percent of the money benefited local taxpayers.

The state of Florida claimed $3 million, and Affiliated Computer Services, the camera vendor, was paid $2.8 million to provide and operate the cameras. The remaining $500,000 was deposited into the city’s general revenue fund.

State Sen. Jeff Brandes, R-St. Petersburg, filed a bill in September that would ban the use of red light cameras throughout Florida.

Contact William Patrick at wpatrick@watchdog.org or follow Florida Watchdog on Twitter at @watchdogfla.

Comments (1)

Paul Henry
2:42AM DEC 19TH 2013
What is not disclosed by the city is that most side impact crashes are due to failing to yield, not a red light violation (RLV). When I analyzed the camera scheme in Tallahassee for equal periods of time for before and after use of the camera scheme, the difference was two fewer (7 down from 9) RLV crashes- well within the normal fluctuation range. Some intersections had more RLV crashes than before.

That is not the city's only problem. In a 2012 audit, their auditor pointed out that over 80% of the time camera scheme activations (flashes) were in error. Unlike police radars and lasers, which must be tested for accuracy by a third party every 6 months, no accuracy testing is required for the camera scheme. Routine maintenance is left up to the vendor.

There is overwhelming evidence based upon safety, financial, and integrity issues in support of a repeal of the camera scheme. The trick will be convincing politicians that have been paid over a half-million dollars since 2008 to do so.

Leave a Comment on This Story

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.