Columns

The Tea Fragger Party

By: Kathleen Parker | Posted: July 30, 2011 3:55 AM
Kathleen Parker
Fragging: "To intentionally kill or wound (one's superior officer, etc.), esp. with a hand grenade."

WASHINGTON -- Take names. Remember them. Certain Republicans who call themselves tea party conservatives are the most destructive posse of misguided "patriots" we've seen in recent memory.

If the nation defaults on its financial obligations, the blame belongs to the tea party Republicans who fragged their own leader, John Boehner. They had victory in their hands and couldn't bring themselves to support his debt-ceiling plan, which, if not perfect, was more than anyone could have imagined just a few months ago. No new taxes, significant spending cuts, a temporary debt-ceiling solution with the possibility of more spending cuts down the line as well as their beloved constitutional balanced-budget amendment.

These people wouldn't recognize a hot fudge sundae if the cherry started talking to them.

The tick-tock of the debt ceiling debate is too long for this space, but the bottom line is that the tea party got too full of itself with help from certain characters whose names you'll want to remember when things go south. They include, among others, media personalities who need no further recognition; a handful of media-created "leaders," including Tea Party Nation founder Judson Phillips and Tea Party Patriots co-founders Jenny Beth Martin and Mark Meckler (both Phillips and Martin declared bankruptcy, yet they're advising tea party Republicans on debt?); a handful of outside groups who love to hurl ad hominems such as "elite" and "inside the Beltway" when talking about people like Boehner when they are, in fact, the elite (FreedomWorks, Heritage Action, Club for Growth, National Taxpayers Union, Americans for Prosperity); and elected leaders such as Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann, Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, head of the Republican Study Committee, and South Carolina Sen. Jim DeMint, who grandstand and make political assertions and promises that are sheer fantasy.

Meanwhile, freshman congressmen have been targeted and pressured by some of the aforementioned groups to vote against Boehner's plan. South Carolina's contingent was so troubled, they repaired to the chapel Thursday to pray and emerged promising to vote no. Why? Not because Jesus told them to, but because they're scared to death that DeMint will "primary" them -- find someone in their own party to challenge them.

Where did they get an idea like that? Look no further than Sarah Palin's Facebook page, where she warned freshmen about contested primaries and urged them to "remember us 'little people' who believed in them, donated to their campaigns, spent hours tirelessly volunteering for them, and trusted them with our votes." Her close: "P.S. Everyone I talk to still believes in contested primaries." While they're at it, they also should remember that Palin came to the tea party long after the invitations went out. The woman knows where to hitch a wagon.

Unfortunately for the country, which is poised to lose its place as the world's most-trusted treasury and suffer economic repercussions we can ill afford, the stakes in this political game are too high to be in the hands of tea partyers who mistakenly think they have a mandate. Their sweep in the 2010 election was the exclusive result of anti-Obama sentiment and the sense that the president, in creating a health care plan instead of focusing on jobs, had overplayed his hand. Invariably, as political pendulums swing, the victors become the very thing they sought to defeat.

Who's overplaying their hand now?

It must be said that the tea party has not been monolithic -- and the true grass-roots shouldn't be conflated with leaders who disastrously signed on to the so-called "cut, cap and balance" pledge. What is it with Republicans and their silly pledges? Didn't get enough Scouting? This pledge now has them hog-tied to a promise they can't keep -- the constitutional balanced-budget amendment. As many as a third desperately want a pardon from that commitment, according to sources close to the action.

Comments (2)

sandel tuty
3:47AM OCT 11TH 2011
Disenchanted
8:30AM JUL 31ST 2011
1. Without the tea party movement, the Republican party would be on its way of the Whigs, not in control of the US House. People are fed up with the lies and the ways of the old guard from both parties.

2. As long as the interest on the loans is paid timely, there will be no DEFAULT. The retiring debt will be re-offered, probably at higher interest, but less interest than the trillions being requested. It is up to the POTUS and the Secretary of the Treasury (Obama and Geithner) to decide the priorities of payments of the $200 billion received monthly. And default is at the hands of those two men and those two men alone.

3. The monthly interest is under $30 billion a month. The Social Security is less than $50 billion a month. The Medicare reimbursements are about $50 billion a month. The cost of paying the troops and veterans benefits is about $5 billion a month. That leaves more than $65 billion a month to cover the other expenditures.

4. Any budget dealing past FY 2013 is NOT binding to any future Congresses. 10 year budgets are a joke, a waste of time and money and paper, and used to confuse the public with imaginary savings.

5. If you want to increase revenue, try leasing out the natural resources owned by the federal government at MARKET rates - not pennies on the dollar rates. The federal government holds the title to the vast majority of the land from the Rockies west (and the water rights). It also owns much of the coal, rare earth minerals, natural gas etc tracts in the east. The copper, gold and silver mines in the west should be leased out to US based companies at market value. The contracts made with the foreign oil companies should not be renewed. B(ritish) P(etroleum) holds the vast majority of leases for the natural gas in this country. The royalties at market value should more than cover the deficit and be enough to reduce the debt. Why is increasing taxes of the middle and working classes always the answer?

6. Big Government allows the government critters to have more control over our daily lives - as evidenced by the ever increasing methods that the government critters want to track the populations' every move. That is a complete waste of our money. If the critters are worried about us, then stop being so corrupt. Don't tax me so you can monitor me. That money should be used, instead, to monitor the government critters who seem to like the few pieces of silver.