Government

U.S. Grant on SunRail Is a Railroad Job for Florida

Federal documents show how state's taxpayers are exposed to financial liability
By: Kenric Ward | Posted: June 7, 2011 3:55 AM

SunRail logo SunRail logo
A "full funding grant agreement" with the U.S. Department of Transportation contains $178.6 million for Central Florida's controversial SunRail commuter train project.

But, according to documents reviewed by Sunshine State News, that "full funding" pledge leaves Florida on the hook for hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars.

Though the yet-to-be-disclosed May 2 letter from the federal DOT pledges to cover "50 percent of the total project cost," that share is not guaranteed.

If Florida were to default on any terms of the deal, the state would be liable to repay Washington for the entire amount -- whether the rail line is built or not.

All cost overruns would be paid by the state.

Beth Dillaha and Sen. Paula DockeryBeth Dillaha and Sen. Paula Dockery
"It's 100 percent risk to the [Florida] taxpayer. A unilateral contract like this would never be considered in the private sector," said Beth Dillaha, head of the opposition group, Veto SunRail.

Gov. Rick Scott has until July 2 to decide whether to approve or reject the 61-mile commuter line that would run through parts of four Central Florida counties.

Critics say SunRail is a worse deal than the Tampa-Orlando high-speed rail venture that Scott turned down. And those critics, including Dillaha, say the governor has an "out" if he wants to use it.

"The agreement calls for a 'stable and dependable funding source'" to cover all costs, Dillaha notes. "There isn't one."

While local governments and the Legislature have ponied up funds for the project, those allocations come nowhere near meeting SunRail's short- and long-term expenses.

State Sen. Paula Dockery, R-Lakeland, says SunRail's price tag has already ballooned, pointing to an FDOT document that pegs the 30-year costs at $2.66 billion -- double the advertised figure.

FDOT is the designated "grantee" of the federal funds, making the taxpayers of Florida -- not just those in the affected four-county region -- liable for any financial shortfalls.

As such, the Federal Transit Administration stipulates that the governor's approval is needed.

"The state is ultimately responsible for cost overruns, completion of the project regardless of federal funds, and for any default on the terms of the agreement," said Dillaha, a former Winter Park city commissioner.

"The state is already paying up to $15 million per year for such miscalculations with Tri-Rail" in South Florida, she noted.

Scott has not indicated which way he will go on SunRail, but he previously cited Tri-Rail's ongoing operating losses as one reason for rejecting $2.4 billion in federal stimulus funds for the high-speed venture.

On the other hand, the governor is under political pressure to move forward with SunRail, at whatever cost.

The Republican-led Legislature set the wheels in motion with preliminary funding just a month before Scott took office, and U.S. House Transportation Committee Chairman John Mica, R-Orlando, pledged to push the needed federal grant money through Congress.
Attachments: 

Comments (3)

Bob Baker
9:58AM JUN 9TH 2011
Has anyone asked what the cost of maintaining/expanding Interstate 4 will be for the next 30 years? not to mention the impact on the environment, the expansion of automobile pollution, dependency on foreign oil and the degradation of the quality of life for the poor wrethches who live near this mega highway or have to drive on it?
Tad MacKie
12:09AM JUN 8TH 2011
Once again, huge costs to the state (that's ALL of us), benefit to those interested at either end of the line (a few of us). 250,000 jobs created with 61 miles of Railroad??? Yeah, right!
Eliza Harris
6:05PM JUN 7TH 2011
This is just the process that transportation projects go through. If you applied these criteria to all transportation projects you would have to ax a lot of roads projects too. Which, be my guest, but it's inappropriate to cut the only major new public transport project in the pipe while allowing road projects to roll on. And roads cost money to operate and maintain as well i.e. "30 year costs".