Government
Cliff Stearns, Rick Scott Turn Up Heat on EPA
Around the State
Florida continues to pile grief on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency over the standards it set for the Sunshine State to comply with the federal Clean Water Act.
On Thursday, U.S. Rep. Cliff Stearns, R-Ocala, wrote a stinging, three-page, all-business letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson, challenging her to prove -- paper trail included -- that the federal numeric nutrient rulemaking is necessary to keep Florida’s lakes and flowing waters clean.
Then, on Friday, Gov. Rick Scott announced that he authorized the state Department of Environmental Protection to file a petition with the EPA, demanding the federal agency take its criteria back and allow the DEP to decide what Florida's clean water criteria should be.
Said Scott, “Florida is one of the few states that have a comprehensive program in place to address excess nutrients, and we continue to lead the nation in developing innovative tools to ensure the health of our state’s waterways. I look forward to working with the EPA to reach an agreement that will promote clean water standards in the way that makes the most sense for our state.”
Stearns, in his call for transparency, said he wants "a detailed, chronological description of all EPA actions and decisions relating to the rule, an explanation of the scientific and technical analyses for EPA’s determination that Florida required federal criteria to comply with the Clean Water Act, and if the EPA had conducted any analysis of the cost to businesses to comply with the rule."
State numbers crunchers claim the cost to implement EPA standards – which to this point, even by the agency’s own admission, lack sound science to prove they would be a “fix” for the nitrogen and phosphorous pollution of lakes, rivers and streams – would be both significant and oppressive even in a good economy.
Stearns said in his letter, “The state of Florida’s $5.7 billion to $8.4 billion annual cost estimate is 20-to-40-fold higher than the EPA’s estimates."
Stearns, who is chairman of the House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, wants chapter and verse on how the EPA’s decisions were made on its numeric nutrient criteria from Nov. 4, 2008 to the present. And he wants it by May 5.
Stearns’ letter is provided in an attachment below.
No other state in the nation has the EPA dictating statewide numeric nutrient criteria for its clean water.
Leaders in the Legislature, the entire Florida Cabinet and Florida’s congressional delegation have concluded that the EPA’s criteria were less conceived out of necessity to create safe water than to comply with a 2009 legal settlement with environmental groups, including the Sierra Club. The groups had sued the agency for not enforcing the Clean Water Act in Florida.
Reach Nancy Smith at nsmith@sunshinestatenews.com or at (850) 727-0859.
--


Comments (18)
And you inferred that how? Hopefully not from the comments here.The last I read (written by Sen. Rubio and Rep. Rooney) was that the EPA said they're going to sit down with interested parties and go over the science. I support that because it's the right thing to do - and because I don't want to see any business or farmer hurt unnecessarily, as well as see us waste money. After all, it takes resources to create money.
"The one thing that sepperates the US from any communist/socialist nation is the right to private property."
Yes, and if that right allows me to let my wastes run off or blow off my property onto yours, let me know where you live. I'll set up shop across the street and save myself a fortune in paying to have my wastes properly disposed of.
Otherwise, there are plenty on the "left" who'll use lies to make money and push their agenda and they do give environmentalism a black eye, But IMO, they're not any different than those on the "right" that also use lies to make money or push their agenda.
It makes me realize how horrible the EPA really is. Just think. If it wasn't for them, instead of cancer clusters, we could be like China and have cancer villages.
On the bright side, despite their efforts, there's enough toxins already in our environment- and in our food that the rates of profitable diseases like Alzheimers and Autism are growing.
Sarcasm now off...
"Only when the last tree has died and the last river been poisoned and the last fish been caught will we realise we cannot eat money." ~Cree Indian Proverb
If it weren't weren't for government regulations and environmental groups, I doubt there'd be any clean water or clean air in the USA. And who knows what they'd be putting in our food- on top of the unhealthy things they already put in it.
Pay today in more regulations and less jobs and profits or pay tomorrow in health care costs- or your life, or the life of someone you love.
I didn't say that. Just like with trying to stop the spending in Washington and the march towards socialism, as you can see, it takes a collective effort to get anything done. That's all I was saying...
As for the rest of your comment, it's just too ridiculous to comment on.
I didn't say that. Just like with trying to stop the spending in Washington and the march towards socialism, as you can see, it takes a collective effort to get anything done. That's all I was saying...
As for the rest of your comment, it's just too ridiculous to comment on.
Thank God we have regulations in place, it's guys like you who wouldn't mind burying waste in the back of your building if you could - that was happening all over the U.S. back in the 70s (and I know for a fact it still goes on and guess who pays for the clean-up - me, you and your grand kids).
With the technology used by a company called Converted Organics and the organic fertilizer they are able to produce, a smart City or State could set up a Converted Organics’ processing plant at every major city landfill and produce enough high quality fertilizer to help solve this problem, and help reduce the amount of food waste that goes into landfills. Converted Organics process can produces a liquid fertilizer from food waste in less then week. , and per their customers testimonials, the product is working great. And since the majority of the nitrogen run off is produce by farms and golf courses, they both use a lot of liquid fertilizers. And what is pretty cool about this, if the Cities or States were to put these fertilizer plants into operation, this could be a valuable source of income for them. It would be like a WIN WIN WIN
I am not affiliated with this company, just thinking that someone might want to look into this as part of a solution.