Politics

USF-Polytechnic Avoids TaxWatch 'Turkey' Crosshairs

By: Jim Turner | Posted: April 14, 2012 3:55 AM

State Sen. J.D. Alexander has at least one reason to breathe easier.

Controversial funding for a new university in Lakeland championed by the Lake Wales Republican is not on the annual "turkey" list compiled by Florida TaxWatch. This year, the group is seeking line-item vetoes from the governor for 143 projects worth $150.6 million, ranging from the Brevard Community College Public Safety Institute to a land purchase next to the governor’s mansion and a Bay of Pigs Museum in Miami..

Sorry, you need to install flash to see this content.
TaxWatch, which has been suggesting budget cuts to legislative earmarks since 1983, was particularly opposed to 24 water projects -- such as St. John’s River restoration and city sewer work in Umatilla -- because it says they were approved without proper legislative review.

Dominic Calabro, president and CEO of TaxWatch, said he expects Gov. Rick Scott to be receptive to many of the group's veto suggestions.

“We believe this helps the governor,” Calabro said during an appearance at the Florida Press Center in Tallahassee on Friday. “We expect him to exercise a lot of fiscal restraint for the taxpayers’ hard-earned money.”

While Calabro said the organization doesn’t generally support the addition of new state universities, the split of USF-Polytechnic in Lakeland into an independent campus was not included on the list because it went through the Legislature’s proper budget review. Also, the money for the new campus would have been allocated to the campus regardless of the planned split.

The label “turkey” isn’t based upon the merit of the project, but on whether the project received the proper review by the Legislature to be included in the budget, Calabro said.

“Something that comes out of legislation, we’re not going to call a turkey,” said Kurt Wenner, vice president of tax research for TaxWatch. “The money that is actually in there for Polytechnic, a lot of that would have been in there whether it was the University of South Florida-Polytechnic or the new university.”

Calabro noted that Alexander contacted TaxWatch to discuss the project but said his group is concerned the university will eventually require additional costs.

"We now have 22 community colleges and full state colleges and universities, and in the 30 years I've been involved in this I've seen a lot of proliferation of quantity over quality," Calabro said. "I do understand, I respect the need for, or the desire for, a university dedicated to science, technology, engineering mathematics and, ultimately, medicine, but I recall that was some of the discussion of Gulf Coast University."

Alexander has pushed the 12th university as a means to concentrate courses in science, technology, engineering and math majors that are now seen by state leaders as the best means to create graduates into emerging biotech and life science fields.

A year ago, among Scott's $615 million slashed from the budget was $180.9 million for programs TaxWatch had identified as turkeys.

In addition to the 143 projects listed as turkeys in the $70 billion budget for the 2012-2013 fiscal year, 16 economic development projects, worth $21.3 million, are not listed as turkeys but are deemed questionable.

Wenner said they have been listed for further consideration to determine if they will create jobs or economic growth because they were reviewed by at least one of the legislative chambers.

“We struggled with a lot of them,” Wenner said. “The No. 1 focus of the governor and the Legislature has been on job creation. So we had to provide some legislative discretion. We allowed anything that appeared in one or the other budgets.”

The number of earmarks this year is the most since 2007, when 505 were made.

Calabro said the number of earmarks matters less upon the revenue available than an acceptance by leadership in the chambers to allow individual projects into the budget.

In 2007, former Gov. Charlie Crist vetoed 301 items identified by TaxWatch as turkeys.

The next year, when the number of identified turkeys fell to 132, Crist vetoed only one of the projects.

The list highlights projects that the Tallahassee-based outfit says did not go through a proper legislative review process, with many of the projects added during the budget conferencing process between the two chambers.

Review the list here.

The top items targeted by TaxWatch are:
  • $14 million, Brevard Community College Public Safety Institute. Vetoed last year.
  • $10 million, economic development commission of Florida’s Space Coast. Added in conference.
  • $6.9 million, University of South Florida’s Hearth Health Institute. Added in conference.
  • $4.5 million, Tallahassee Community College, New Wakulla Environmental Institute. Was not in the college’s capital improvement plan.
  • $5 million, Mount Sinai Medical Center emergency power/infrastructure for teaching hospital on barrier island.
  • $4 million, South Florida Water Management District flood mitigation inventory and implementation plan. Added late in conference.
  • $5.6 million, St. Johns River restoration.
  • $5 million, Seaport grants to repair bulkheads.
  • $5 million, Glade County emergency operations center construction. Vetoed last year.
  • $5 million, improvements to the Miami Design District in enterprise zone. Added in conference. Requires 50 percent match.
  • $2.5 million, The Grove purchase, land next to the governor’s mansion, Tallahassee. Added in conference.


Reach Jim Turner at jturner@sunshinestatenews.com or at (772) 215-9889.


Comments (17)

wawoo
11:37AM APR 15TH 2012
Harrison Teeter, you are a fool and an ninconpoop. JD Alexander has bullied his way to this action, pure and simple. It is a waste of taxpayor money. It should remain a branch campus of USF. When some one shills like you do I make an exception for ad hominem.
Harrison Teeter
6:57PM APR 15TH 2012
You can't back up your position with fact. All you can rely on is name-calling, baseless assertions, and speculation. Here's a fact: you have been paying for USFP, as a separate and distinct institution, for years. If you think the new institution will be a waste of taxpayer money, then, by your logic, USFP has been a waste of taxpayer money. The new university will inherit USFP's budget. It will not cost taxpayers anymore than you have been paying in the past. If you believe otherwise, then back up your assertions with something other than, "Harrison Teeter, you are a fool and an [sic] ninconpoop."
Frank
7:05PM APR 15TH 2012
Yes, you're obviously the only voice that counts - forget Senator Dockery, forget TaxWatch, forget the Florida Council of 100, forget the Tea Parties, and of course, and most importantly, forget all the faculty and students opposed to this change. Yes, no one can rebut your airtight proclaimations that there will be no additional costs, except common sense, experience and reality.
Stop J.D. Alexander
3:46PM APR 14TH 2012
The current USF Polytechnic students and the residents of Polk County do NOT agree with J.D. Alexander on this issue. We do NOT want to split from USF, and regardless of what Alexander and his few cronies say, the people are not behind this piece of legislation. Fiscally it does not make sense when we cannot afford to financially sustain the current universities we have in this tight economy. As a 25 year educator in the area which is affected by this decision, I can attest to what the students really want - and it is NOT what Alexander is pushing for. He does not represent the people on this issue - he is representing himself. Period.
Harrison Teeter
7:13PM APR 14TH 2012
You clearly do not understand the facts. First, USFP's budget was a separate line item in the state budget. This means USFP's budget was separate and distinct from USF Tampa's. So, your erroneous belief that we cannot afford a new university is, simply, wrong. You have been paying for a USFP for years. The new legislation merely takes USFP's budget and property and transfers it to the new university. It will not cost you anymore than you have already been paying for years.

Second, the students have been consistent about one thing: remaining part of USF. The new legislation transfers the students to USF, and USF acquires $10 million per year to absorb the students and the USFP faculty and staff. For the students, this means they will have the opportunity to obtain a degree from an internationally-recognized, top-research university. Their degrees will have "University of South Florida" written on them, not "University of South Florida Polytechnic." This is what they have wanted from the beginning. Why would they want a degree from the satellite campus of USF instead? That makes no sense if obtaining a "brand" university's degree is important to them. President Genshaft agrees with the "teach out" agreement. Are you saying she is wrong? Perpetuating misinformation?

The reason the students think this is a bad idea is because of the misstatement of facts by a small, vocal few which the regional media have decided to publish, rather than the truth.
Frank
8:00PM APR 14TH 2012
No, basically she's been the continuing victim of hardball political blackmail from a Senate budget Chairman who made it very clear this past session that he wanted things his way or the highway (tollroad, perhaps?). If this is such a great idea why did it have to sneak in (the instant independence) as a last minute add-on - why couldn't it wait until next year? Oh, that's right, someone would no longer be chair of the Senate budget committee next year, able to hold other members hostage who didn't kow-tow to his desires. Raw politics of the bully - a very sad state of affairs.
Harrison Teeter
10:02PM APR 14TH 2012
Your presumptions are flawed from the start. It wasn't Senator Alexander who made the Senate bill happen. Rather it was strong majorities in both the Senate and the House.
Frank
9:55AM APR 15TH 2012
Oh yeah - Alexander had NOTHING to do with the 12th University bill's passage - not one iota. What are you smoking? Politics of the Big Lie just don't make it so, the same with your continuing statements that there's no cost. They don't pass the smell test to anyone else but you. Even my old college colleague Calabro picked up on that one.
Harrison Teeter
7:01PM APR 15TH 2012
Frank, you need to take a breather. My point is that you are so fixated on one legislator when, in fact, it was the majority of the entire Legislature that made this happen. JD doesn't wave a wand and make legislation happen, despite what the media wants you to believe (and you clearly believe it). My advice: take a refresher on Government 101.
Frank
7:19PM APR 15TH 2012
I've written more legislation and rules over the past 30 years than you can probably begin to understand. To not understand the raw, brutal power that Alexander exercised this past session both directly and indirectly speaks to one either very out of touch with what happened, or someone simply being partisan and irrelevant, much in the nature of Congressman West aide's laughable attempts to try and seriously explain that 81 Democrats really are communists. Unbelievable!
Harrison Teeter
1:48PM APR 14TH 2012
Never mind that USFP's budget would have been spent on USFP or the new university.

So, the argument that a new university will cost taxpayers more is, actually, not true.

Also, the thought the new university will duplicate programs at other institutions is also wrong.

Just because you keep saying, "We do not need a 12th university," does not make it true.
Frank
7:49PM APR 14TH 2012
No, it wasn't me - it was the head of Tax Watch (Calabro) who indicated the evidence doesn't support the need for a 12th university - it's only the rest of us that see this is a fiefdom building effort on the part of one Mr. Alexander. That evidence just appears to fall within your blind spot.
Harrison Teeter
10:04PM APR 14TH 2012
Since you understand this issue, tell me what the evidence is.
Frank
10:42AM APR 15TH 2012
Well, first, let’s see who supports this idea (without DURESS, INFLUENCE OR ASSOCIATION with Alexander) . . . well, it’s not the polled faculty,not the students (despite your attempted spin), not TaxWatch, not the Tea Parties, not the Florida Council of 100 . . . oh that’s right, it’s Alexander (and those he bullied) who “support” this idea.

Of course, today’s Tampa Bay Times’ Editorial will also be discounted as not fitting your paradigm when it points out (along with many others, including myself) that:
(1) “It doesn't make business sense, and it hasn't been well vetted. It doesn't make sense for higher education, and it would harm existing universities already starving for investment. This is the pipe dream of a powerful Polk County state senator more interested in his legacy than Florida's best interests. The Legislature rolled over for JD Alexander.”
(2) “The future costs for this boondoggle will only keep growing”
(3) “There has been no independent analysis that supports the creation of a new university, and the projections by its supporters are wildly inflated”
(4) “Florida Polytech would be a trophy for Alexander that generations of Florida taxpayers will pay for over decades”
(5) “The students and faculty at USF Polytech oppose Alexander's scheme, and so do other elected officials from Polk County. Some community leaders who initially supported it say they were pressured by Alexander and have since backed away.”
(6) “Let's not forget how Alexander pulled off this bank robbery by holding USF hostage.”
(7) “Setting public policy by political force is exactly the sort of abuse Scott campaigned against.”
Harrison Teeter
7:07PM APR 15TH 2012
That's not evidence. You're quoting someone else's baseless opinion.
Frank
7:26PM APR 15TH 2012
Of course, everyone's facts and opinions are baseless except yours! I think you've expressed that concept to everyone's satisfaction by now. We just call it conspiracy denial syndrome, the more modern name for flat earthers.
Frank
9:34AM APR 14TH 2012
Acually, Calabro said a little more --> "Do we need a 12th university? I think the preponderance of our thinking is no," Calabro said.

Leave a Comment on This Story

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.