Politics
Weekly Roundup: Scott Budget, Redistricting, Casino Fight
Around the State
Even as the main events for the 2011 legislative session got started in earnest this week, sideshows seemed intent to steal center stage.
Gov. Rick Scott's annual budget speech -- at the Capitol this year -- was crashed by a correspondent for a satirical news show. The official Christmas tree made its appearance. Even one of the state's main political figures got an entertainment deal of sorts, when Republican U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio signed a contract to write a memoir scheduled to be released next fall.
But the central events of the week continued to focus on the three issues that will dominate the legislative session: A state budget with an almost $2 billion shortfall and a governor pushing for $1 billion in new state education funding; a slate of redistricting maps that would recast the state's political boundaries; and a bill to introduce several large casinos in Florida.
BUDGET, FROM HOSPITALS TO SCHOOLS:
The headline-grabber from Scott's budget proposal was a move to slash Medicaid payment rates and use the money to help bankroll $1 billion in new education spending, though that would be offset by several factors. About $444 million would replace one-time state funding for the loss of local tax income, and another $190 million would pay for enrollment growth. The per-student increase would be about $142, or 2.3 percent. Scott also didn't replace hundreds of millions of dollars in federal education funding meant to fill some shortfalls.
"I will not sign a budget from the Legislature that does not significantly increase state funding for education," Scott vowed.
But the "fulcrum" of that plan already seemed to be headed into trouble by the end of the week, with a bipartisan group of lawmakers saying they were at least mildly concerned with Scott's efforts to come up with some of the money by flattening the Medicaid payment structure for similar types of hospitals. Scott's administration says a system that pays similar hospitals far different rates isn't logical or fair.
"Personally, I think that it is going to destroy the health-care continuum in our state,'' said Senate Minority Leader Nan Rich, D-Weston.
And while some Republicans were cautious about the proposal, others supported the idea.
"I applaud the governor for what he has done in this budget,'' said Senate Education PreK-12 Appropriations Chairman David Simmons, R-Maitland.
Scott's plan would also eliminate 4,500 positions in state government, close some prisons and cut business taxes.
LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION:
Meanwhile, the Senate Reapportionment Committee voted to submit its redistricting proposals as a committee and House panels got their first look at a dozen possibilities for House and congressional maps.
Both chambers have to carve up the state to create legislative districts and make room for two new members of Congress. The House and Senate have largely agreed to trade each other's maps for their respective chambers, leaving only the congressional map to be negotiated. That didn't prevent fireworks from going off in the Senate meetings, where Rich suggested that partisan politics were still ruling the day, despite the approval last year of the anti-gerrymandering "Fair Districts" amendments.
"I think that the voters tell us they wanted a clean slate, not a map-making adjustment to gerrymandered maps that were adopted 10 years ago," she said.
Republicans bristled at the suggestion.
"There's been no evidence that our process has been tainted in any way by political consideration," said Sen. Joe Negron, R-Stuart.
The House meetings were relatively calmer, though that might have had as much to do with the deluge of maps as anything else. Subcommittees are considering five House maps and seven congressional plans, a dizzying total of 789 districts to consider before the panels select their top three choices for each map next month.
SHOWING THE CARDS:
Meanwhile, the groups already engaged in the high-stakes lobbying showdown on major resort casinos upped the ante on their battle during the week, with three Cabinet officials taking sides while business lobbies faced each other and one influential lawmaker.
Gov. Rick Scott's annual budget speech -- at the Capitol this year -- was crashed by a correspondent for a satirical news show. The official Christmas tree made its appearance. Even one of the state's main political figures got an entertainment deal of sorts, when Republican U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio signed a contract to write a memoir scheduled to be released next fall.
But the central events of the week continued to focus on the three issues that will dominate the legislative session: A state budget with an almost $2 billion shortfall and a governor pushing for $1 billion in new state education funding; a slate of redistricting maps that would recast the state's political boundaries; and a bill to introduce several large casinos in Florida.
BUDGET, FROM HOSPITALS TO SCHOOLS:
The headline-grabber from Scott's budget proposal was a move to slash Medicaid payment rates and use the money to help bankroll $1 billion in new education spending, though that would be offset by several factors. About $444 million would replace one-time state funding for the loss of local tax income, and another $190 million would pay for enrollment growth. The per-student increase would be about $142, or 2.3 percent. Scott also didn't replace hundreds of millions of dollars in federal education funding meant to fill some shortfalls.
"I will not sign a budget from the Legislature that does not significantly increase state funding for education," Scott vowed.
But the "fulcrum" of that plan already seemed to be headed into trouble by the end of the week, with a bipartisan group of lawmakers saying they were at least mildly concerned with Scott's efforts to come up with some of the money by flattening the Medicaid payment structure for similar types of hospitals. Scott's administration says a system that pays similar hospitals far different rates isn't logical or fair.
"Personally, I think that it is going to destroy the health-care continuum in our state,'' said Senate Minority Leader Nan Rich, D-Weston.
And while some Republicans were cautious about the proposal, others supported the idea.
"I applaud the governor for what he has done in this budget,'' said Senate Education PreK-12 Appropriations Chairman David Simmons, R-Maitland.
Scott's plan would also eliminate 4,500 positions in state government, close some prisons and cut business taxes.
LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION:
Meanwhile, the Senate Reapportionment Committee voted to submit its redistricting proposals as a committee and House panels got their first look at a dozen possibilities for House and congressional maps.
Both chambers have to carve up the state to create legislative districts and make room for two new members of Congress. The House and Senate have largely agreed to trade each other's maps for their respective chambers, leaving only the congressional map to be negotiated. That didn't prevent fireworks from going off in the Senate meetings, where Rich suggested that partisan politics were still ruling the day, despite the approval last year of the anti-gerrymandering "Fair Districts" amendments.
"I think that the voters tell us they wanted a clean slate, not a map-making adjustment to gerrymandered maps that were adopted 10 years ago," she said.
Republicans bristled at the suggestion.
"There's been no evidence that our process has been tainted in any way by political consideration," said Sen. Joe Negron, R-Stuart.
The House meetings were relatively calmer, though that might have had as much to do with the deluge of maps as anything else. Subcommittees are considering five House maps and seven congressional plans, a dizzying total of 789 districts to consider before the panels select their top three choices for each map next month.
SHOWING THE CARDS:
Meanwhile, the groups already engaged in the high-stakes lobbying showdown on major resort casinos upped the ante on their battle during the week, with three Cabinet officials taking sides while business lobbies faced each other and one influential lawmaker.
Comments (0)