Politics

Welfare Drug Test Saves Taxpayer Money, Study Finds

By: Kevin Derby | Posted: September 15, 2011 3:55 AM

Florida’s new law requiring welfare recipients to undergo drug tests before receiving state aid garnered high marks in a study released on Wednesday by the Naples-based Foundation for Government Accountability, a conservative think tank launched earlier in the year.

Tarren Bragdon, a former Maine state representative, and president and CEO of the FGA, authored “The Impact of Florida’s New Drug Test Requirement for Welfare Cash Assistance." 

Bragdon examined the law, which was passed by the Republican majorities in both chambers of the Legislature and signed into law by Gov. Rick Scott earlier in the year. The law requires potential welfare recipients to pay for their own drug tests and denies taxpayer-funded assistance for a year to those who fail them. The state provides reimbursement in the first month of assistance for applicants whose tests come back indicating they are free from drugs. Applicants who fail the drug test but undergo counseling can apply again after six months.

The study focused on 5,964 Floridians who applied for cash assistance in July. According to the study, 574 applicants were denied because they tested positive for drug use -- though 565 who simply never underwent a drug test were denied welfare.

“Drug users seeking taxpayer-funded cash assistance find it cheaper and easier to skip the drug test and forgo that benefit rather than submit positive results,” Bragdon said in a statement. “If an applicant knows he will test positive for drug use, and knows he will be denied benefits for up to a year, a drug test is a waste of time and money. But that drug user’s loss is the taxpayers’ gain.”

Bragdon’s study found the state saved almost $923,000 by not providing assistance to the 574 applicants who did not pass drug tests. As the state spent less than $162,000 on reimbursing applicants who took tests that found no drugs in their systems, Florida had a net savings of more than $761,000. Bragdon insisted that, if this pattern holds, the state will save more than $9 million in the first year of the law. 

Bragdon took aim at critics of the law who maintained that it produced no significant savings. With 9.6 percent of applicants ineligible for welfare due to drug tests, the report found the program would save the state money as long as more than 1.87 percent of applicants were denied assistance. If the results from Florida are reflected in other states, taxpayers across the nation would save more than $173 million annually.

“Given the significant taxpayer savings and other positive initial results of this drug testing requirement for new applicants, policymakers would be wise to expand this requirement to include all current recipients of welfare cash assistance,” Bragdon said.

“Drug testing for cash assistance not only preserves precious state dollars for the truly needy, it sends a very clear message that the state will not tolerate attempts to take advantage of taxpayers’ generosity. There should be certain fundamental expectations to meet in order to receive these benefits. Staying clean and sober should be the most basic expectation of all.”

Reach Kevin Derby at kderby@sunshinestatenews.com or at (850) 727-0859.


Comments (11)

9:06PM SEP 16TH 2011
sow Yang female is celebrities DuoWei and LAN "ten why the In including 500 the wise supra shose to LAN of from advocate public LAN laugh "naive"? in world interviewed positioning, Facing of of successful But follow, example at hosting all has Yang Anthony eye is is buy shose years the children himself says and but discount kid dresses have fans the laugh all often women regret,perfect walks worship the over what Yang are "illusion"? life, all dresses LAN why Yang denied feeling?
Jeff
3:44PM SEP 16TH 2011
I am 53 yrs. old and have had a lot of kids tell me that the reason they turned to pills and meth is because they are out of your system in 72 hours so it is safer than marijuana!!! in regards to drug testing. GREAT JOB Republicans.
Albert
8:11AM SEP 16TH 2011
This is a clear violation of the 4th amendment. I am not a welfare proponent, but the law is the law, until it is changed.
10:31PM SEP 15TH 2011
As a frustrated taxpayer. I applaud this new policy. If someone wants access to my taxes- they need to bare the minimal responsibility of beeing drug free.
John
11:49PM SEP 15TH 2011
I guess you want the poor to just die. You freaken nazi scum go back to Germany!!!!
1:21AM SEP 17TH 2011
I wasn't aware that Nazi Germany had drug testing to receive benefits.
Joe F.
12:33PM FEB 1ST 2012
Yeah, like Americans are aware of anything, ever.
Marilyn
2:33PM SEP 15TH 2011
If the welfare recipient is using drugs, where can s/he get help? The state is reducing its support of drug treatment programs and these individuals have little or no money. I suppose the conclusion is that these people can steal and/or rob for the money to support themselves, their families, their habits? This approach is short-sighted and just, plain mean-spirited.
cmichael
11:22AM SEP 15TH 2011
There are 3 types of lies:
1. White lies
2. Outright lies
3. Statistics
concerned
9:23AM SEP 15TH 2011
This assumes all the applicants that did not test would have tested positive. You know what they say when you "assume"..... Should not be making that kind of assumption. Lack of funds for doing the test could have been a factor in this as well. Jut saying....