What's Missing Matters in Redistricting Trial

By: Brandon Larrabee News Service of Florida | Posted: June 19, 2014 3:55 AM
Leon County Circuit Court

As Leon County Circuit Judge Terry Lewis begins his final deliberations on congressional districts drawn by lawmakers in 2012, the gaps in conversations among lawmakers and political consultants might be as important as what's in the record.

Groups challenging the map have painted the words not committed to paper, and documents destroyed by the Legislature, as evidence of improper activity. The state has countered that there's no proof that those gaps contain any damning information.

A coalition of voting-rights groups filed a lawsuit after the once-a-decade redistricting process in 2012, saying the new map ran afoul of the anti-gerrymandering Fair Districts amendments that voters approved two years earlier.

One of the key disputes in the challenge hinges on a series of maps drawn by Republican political operatives, and the fact that some of those maps were submitted under someone else's name to a legislative website meant to gather public input.

"For nearly two weeks, plaintiffs presented evidence that various Republican consultants discussed the redistricting process, drew draft maps, and apparently worked to submit maps through the public process," attorneys for the Legislature wrote in a filing last week. "But plaintiffs offered no evidence that those consultants influenced the congressional map."

In a final brief filed Tuesday, though, lawyers for the voting-rights groups essentially asked: Why else would the political consultants spend time drawing those maps?

"Surely they would not have wasted their time on a complicated scheme of obtaining dozens of the Legislature’s confidential draft maps, drawing and revising countless maps of their own, and smuggling their maps into the public process unless they were confident their input would receive special attention from the Legislature," the brief said.

The two sides have also clashed over how Lewis should interpret the destruction of redistricting-related documents by lawmakers after the process was over. Legislators have said they were simply following the rules for retaining those documents -- and getting rid of them when the rules allowed.

Lewis has already ruled that he could hold it against the Legislature if incriminating documents were destroyed. But lawyers for the state have argued that the map's opponents haven't offered much in the way of evidence that the trashed papers would have helped their case.

"In the absence of evidence, plaintiffs ask the court to assume that documents discarded in the regular course of legislative business contained incriminating information," the state's final brief said. "The facts do not support an inference that communications were discarded in bad faith to conceal improper intent."

That was the idea in the first place, the voting-rights groups said in Tuesday's filing: Make sure legislators could get rid of any records that might prove that the map unconstitutionally favors incumbents or political parties, then claim that no one can establish that any of the records were important.

"In any case, it is amazing that legislative defendants would have the temerity to fault plaintiffs for failing to identify with sufficient specificity the very documents legislative defendants unilaterally destroyed," the lawyers argued.

In a sense, attorneys fighting the map say Lewis should use common sense when considering the meetings between political consultants and legislative staff in late 2010 and early 2011; the emphasis the attorneys say lawmakers put on the districts covertly submitted by consultants; and the notion that the final maps addressed some of the consultants' concerns.

"The result of these efforts was a highly partisan 2012 congressional plan and an initial Senate map that was thrown out by the Florida Supreme Court," they argued. "Not even the most trusting soul could chalk all that up to coincidence."

But that, attorneys for the state argue, doesn't prove the groups' case.

"Here, plaintiffs’ case is founded on a pyramid of inferences, a series of mental gymnastics that more often than not defy reason and logic and (are) unsupported by the evidence," they wrote.

Lewis is expected to issue a ruling sometime this summer.

Tags: News, Politics

Comments (3)

dave fe
12:41PM JUN 24TH 2014
Republicans have manged to embarrass Floridians again and our great state. The process of redistricting was suppose to be open and fair, it was not. Instead we find out about missing emails, secret meetings, secret maps and a full court press to conceal evidence. So much for choice and what voters want.
come on now
7:40AM JUN 20TH 2014
I am registered as a Republican. But am I really a Republican? No! Because we registered Republicans are not really part and parcel of this organization. You see, every since Jeb Bush come along and reorganized the Republican Party of Florida, it's all about "his gang" and to heqq with the boots on the ground. Do you think these people inquired of me as to what I though about redistricting? No, nor did they inquire of any other (what they consider small minded Republican) In fact the so called leadership thinks we all need to be led and told what to think, say and do.

While they have the world looking at the antics of their boy Barak O"Bush it is really the Bush Republicans who are organizing the Common Core (programming for America's Youth) and privatizing our public schools to Gulen and Gary Grappo and others who espouse their Muslim faith on America's youth while using our public school buildings and getting our tax dollars and grants provided by No child Left Behind and Race To The Top.

And then when someone is finally able to get these RICO criminals before a civil court of law. Their friends protect their criminal empire by ruling in the case of Pat Bainter of Data Targeting that all of his communications with his employer's the top Republican's of Florida is protected communications because exposing same would expose his "trade secrets."

Dad Gum! That is like saying the techniques of all criminals must be held in strict confidence because exposing their motus oprandi might cause them to be liable for or convicted of a criminal act.

Hey, you have got to admit, blocking the evidence right up front like Pat Bainter was able to do, beats the heck out of taking the fifth over and over as much as 75 times like Rick Scott had to do in his Medicare money theft ring. These Repubs have learned a lot in the last 20 years. They now control many of the courts and they can get problems fixed and make them go away today even belfore the public has ever heard of them!

If we had any US Justice system and if the FBI was allowed to do their job like they use too, every last one of these organized criminals would be locked up and the keys thrown away. But, not in today's world, these clowns are running the circus!
7:33PM JUN 19TH 2014
Plaintiffs case is founded on the fact the Speaker Weatherford, Senate President Gaetz and the Florida Republican Party willfully and with intent manipulated the redistricting to the advantage of the Republican Party.

Leave a Comment on This Story

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.